In post 922, Wanderer-nl wrote:
Have you been reading my post? I have a townread there. I'm not voting townreads.
Did you see my case on smiffle?
In post 922, Wanderer-nl wrote:
Have you been reading my post? I have a townread there. I'm not voting townreads.
In post 924, Firebringer wrote:In post 921, GuiltyLion wrote:There is no pro-town motivation in being against a survivor lynch. Advocating lynching somebody else is explicitly anti-town, and I'm suspicious of everyone choosing not to be on the Xtoxm wagon.
Wrong.
Stop quoting site meta as your go to.
Everyone on this site sheeps the same stupid strategy for dealing with Survivors, its old. Its stupid.
In post 925, Firebringer wrote:In post 922, Wanderer-nl wrote:
Have you been reading my post? I have a townread there. I'm not voting townreads.
Did you see my case on smiffle?
In post 644, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 224, Tails wrote:
In post 223, LicketyQuickety wrote:
3.) OR, you know, everyone is Scum at this point and I'm trying to see who is Town first. AFAIK I still have my vote on the same person who I originally had my first Scum read on.
Why is you vote parking supposed to prove towniness?
Ha! I could ask you the same thing!
In post 890, Firebringer wrote:What are people scumreading Wanderer on?
I have very Null on Wanderer, just wondering whats so scummy that their is wagon forming for.
In post 921, GuiltyLion wrote:There is no pro-town motivation in being against a survivor lynch. Advocating lynching somebody else is explicitly anti-town, and I'm suspicious of everyone choosing not to be on the Xtoxm wagon.
In post 926, GuiltyLion wrote:Can you name a pro-town reason for not lynching a claimed survivor D1 that doesn't rely on trusting the Surv's intentions?
In post 930, Tails wrote:
Why were you townreading him so hard after his first post?
In post 931, Tails wrote:In post 644, LicketyQuickety wrote:
In post 224, Tails wrote:
In post 223, LicketyQuickety wrote:
3.) OR, you know, everyone is Scum at this point and I'm trying to see who is Town first. AFAIK I still have my vote on the same person who I originally had my first Scum read on.
Why is you vote parking supposed to prove towniness?
Ha! I could ask you the same thing!
I'm not using it to defend myself. Answer the question.
In post 940, Tails wrote:@Lickity: Wouldn't that have been more of a null-read, then? You defended him pretty hard.
In post 943, Tails wrote:Will you vote Wanderer with me?
In post 945, Tails wrote:He postured on Xtoxm pretty hard, voted him after putting on a show, then tried to end the day quickly after making a big deal on not wanting to rush the Xtoxm lynch with his vote. Wanderer is scum.