Mini 1732 - Super Smash Bros. Project M(afia) - D7!

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #975 (ISO) » Tue Oct 27, 2015 1:20 pm

In post 64, GuiltyLion wrote:I have a ganondorf-read on Xtoxm, do not let him get that triforce

OK, wth is this?

GuiltyLion · Post Post #976 (ISO) » Tue Oct 27, 2015 1:34 pm

my reads are accurate, bro

I still think claimed survivor is the best lynch, because Xtoxm could be scum lying and because Wanderer could be town (whereas Xtoxm is guaranteed non-town). But if you all feel like you have to lynch somebody else because Tails aggressively demands it, then Wanderer is the ideal choice, so I'm not gonna fight it.

Wanderer-nl · Post Post #977 (ISO) » Tue Oct 27, 2015 1:42 pm

In post 955, smiffle wrote:Wanderer, are you voting Xt because it's a policy lynch?
You scumread Lickety earlier, correct? Why did you never follow up with a vote on him?

Have you seen the amount of pages?

I'm not interested in reading more arguments about whether or not we lynch xtoxm. Survivor is a PL. End of story.

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #978 (ISO) » Tue Oct 27, 2015 1:47 pm

In post 976, GuiltyLion wrote:my reads are accurate, bro

I still think claimed survivor is the best lynch, because Xtoxm could be scum lying and because Wanderer could be town (whereas Xtoxm is guaranteed non-town). But if you all feel like you have to lynch somebody else because Tails aggressively demands it, then Wanderer is the ideal choice, so I'm not gonna fight it.

In post 977, Wanderer-nl wrote:
In post 955, smiffle wrote:Wanderer, are you voting Xt because it's a policy lynch?
You scumread Lickety earlier, correct? Why did you never follow up with a vote on him?

Have you seen the amount of pages?

I'm not interested in reading more arguments about whether or not we lynch xtoxm. Survivor is a PL. End of story.

Some of my town reads have said we are not going that route so we are going to lynch W-nl. People who disagree with this I will be taking a closer look at.

Wanderer-nl · Post Post #979 (ISO) » Tue Oct 27, 2015 2:14 pm

If you agree then why isn;'t your vote on me yet?

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #980 (ISO) » Tue Oct 27, 2015 2:18 pm

In post 979, Wanderer-nl wrote:If you agree then why isn;'t your vote on me yet?

Because I am going to hammer it.

Nana · Post Post #981 (ISO) » Tue Oct 27, 2015 2:19 pm

VOTE: Xtoxm

Wanderer-nl · Post Post #982 (ISO) » Tue Oct 27, 2015 2:21 pm

@LQ: You gonna wait for my claim?

ika · Post Post #983 (ISO) » Tue Oct 27, 2015 2:42 pm

sigh.....

this is why we lynch survivors, this stupid add dicussion is having more contents then scum hunting right now

i have hosted a game where i out a neutral in and scums tried their darnest to do both lynch it and leave it alive cus town was so torn on it

ika · Post Post #984 (ISO) » Tue Oct 27, 2015 2:43 pm

what im saying is that leaving it here is going to be more burdonsom then help right now cus like everyone is going "LYNCH IT" "NO DONT LYNCH IT"

like how much more clgging do we have to have

Wanderer-nl · Post Post #985 (ISO) » Tue Oct 27, 2015 2:48 pm

If you're talking about WTF mafia then yes, I was scum in that one. If you're not talking about that then yes, I had a game hosted by ika that went like that where I was scum. Lynch xtoxm.
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=54&t=61724 here's the link

Tails · Post Post #986 (ISO) » Tue Oct 27, 2015 3:05 pm

@Ika: Or we could ignore it and let a possible vig take care of it. Besides, what scumhunting have you done outside of the survivor policy lynch?

Tails · Post Post #987 (ISO) » Tue Oct 27, 2015 3:05 pm

Nana, why aren't you talking to me?

Nana · Post Post #988 (ISO) » Tue Oct 27, 2015 3:07 pm

In post 987, Tails wrote:Nana, why aren't you talking to me?

What do you want?

Bulbazak · Post Post #989 (ISO) » Tue Oct 27, 2015 3:12 pm

In post 939, Tails wrote:@Nana: If I ask you a series of questions, will you give me honest direct answers?

Tails · Post Post #990 (ISO) » Tue Oct 27, 2015 3:12 pm

In post 989, Bulbazak wrote:
In post 939, Tails wrote:@Nana: If I ask you a series of questions, will you give me honest direct answers?

Crap

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #991 (ISO) » Tue Oct 27, 2015 3:15 pm

OK, who has meta on Bulbazak?

Tails · Post Post #992 (ISO) » Tue Oct 27, 2015 3:16 pm

I was really hoping to make it more than one game before being outed. Trying to decide if I should keep up this alt's gimmick.

Nana · Post Post #993 (ISO) » Tue Oct 27, 2015 3:18 pm

In post 991, LicketyQuickety wrote:OK, who has meta on Bulbazak?

I have.
But I don't wish to reveal it at this time.

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #994 (ISO) » Tue Oct 27, 2015 3:18 pm

In post 992, Tails wrote:I was really hoping to make it more than one game before being outed. Trying to decide if I should keep up this alt's gimmick.

And that's why at this time I don't do alts.

Tails · Post Post #995 (ISO) » Tue Oct 27, 2015 3:22 pm

To be fair, I only made this alt to see what would happen if nobody knew I was the one behind the slot. I suspected a bit of bias in P4, and I wanted to know if I was suspected on just my actions or my reputation.

LicketyQuickety · Post Post #996 (ISO) » Tue Oct 27, 2015 3:24 pm

In post 995, Tails wrote:To be fair, I only made this alt to see what would happen if nobody knew I was the one behind the slot. I suspected a bit of bias in P4, and I wanted to know if I was suspected on just my actions or my reputation.

You know I was kinda thinking you were and alt because it pretty common for vet players to not really go into detail on their reads. Plus you obviously acted like you had played before.

so about the slip,

sorry, not sorry.

Tails · Post Post #997 (ISO) » Tue Oct 27, 2015 3:25 pm

Trying a solution to prevent future slips. A little too late now, though.

Nana · Post Post #998 (ISO) » Tue Oct 27, 2015 3:26 pm

What questions did you have Tails?

Tails · Post Post #999 (ISO) » Tue Oct 27, 2015 3:27 pm

I assume I'm correct that you're a mechanic with no alignment?