In post 291, Persivul wrote:Your opinion is yours, but no, I don't like seeing someone at L-1 this early on flimsy reasoning. But convince me...why should I vote Block?
Because if he does flip scum you look scummy for this post?
In post 295, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:Persivul so it's not ok that a person took 24 hours over Halloween weekend to get involved but it is ok to use the same argument that the wagon grew "too quickly"? ok.
Of course.
A few posts at the equivalent of 3.5 days is suspicious. As Marge said, what kind of game is this that people are defending lack of participation?
OTOH, yes, I'd be against L-1 at 3.5 days, particularly on the flimsy evidence on Block, which was mostly that he agreed with the prevailing wagons.
In post 291, Persivul wrote:Your opinion is yours, but no, I don't like seeing someone at L-1 this early on flimsy reasoning. But convince me...why should I vote Block?
Because if he does flip scum you look scummy for this post?
He's scummy for it regardless of Blocky flip, because whiteknighting is a thing and the only one I've legitimately seen it from is Persivul so far.
In post 295, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:Persivul so it's not ok that a person took 24 hours over Halloween weekend to get involved but it is ok to use the same argument that the wagon grew "too quickly"? ok.
Of course.
A few posts at the equivalent of 3.5 days is suspicious. As Marge said, what kind of game is this that people are defending lack of participation?
OTOH, yes, I'd be against L-1 at 3.5 days, particularly on the flimsy evidence on Block, which was mostly that he agreed with the prevailing wagons.
In post 273, Kop wrote:Does anybody not find it strange that Blocky has been at L-1 for a while now, and nobody has posted intent or even hammered him. Does this spell an indication that scum are on his wagon?
In post 307, Kop wrote:Anyway. Here is the wagon posts on Blocky.
#8 Marge votes. Reason - Stealing vote.
#29 Titus votes. Reason - Flash Wagon blitz.
#30 Vedith votes. Reason - Lets go lets go.
#40 Marge unvotes. Mistakenly votes for him?
#60 Firebringer votes. Reason - ??
#65 Firebringer Unvotes. Reason - Sleeping
#79 Marge revotes. Reason - Thought setup was different.
#82 Ythan votes. Reason - Kill This.
#119 Ranger votes. Reason - Agrees
#184 Firebringer revotes - For town credit
#237 Marge Unvotes. Reason - Not sure.
But I'm scummy for saying this is a bad wagon.
No. You're scummy for defending the fuck out of it without actual good reason. Tell me why scum wouldn't hop on a partner's wagon for towncred and how their reasoning might look if they did? Nothing you said about the wagon gives any alignment-based reasoning. Just "There's a lot of votes there so it must be a bad wagon."
Persivul. You say what you said about my post towards Blocks wagon, blocks wagon was formed on probably the littlest thing and it ran up. You soft defending it, could be a case you know he is town, and you know he's going to flip that, you get town credit because you were the one who defended it, if Block is hammered.
In post 323, Kop wrote:you get town credit because you were the one who defended it
No one gets towncred for this anymore. It's more about showing that your reads are right and should be trusted. towncred needs to be earned in other ways.
Can someone walk me through some theory on the setup? I've never played C9++ before and the wiki is confusing. ELI5 pretty please.