In post 2359, Espeonage wrote:Oh yeah, @Star: What is the point of posting everything someone has done if it doesn't pertain to the case you are trying to make. All it does is fill out your post and make it longer. Take the wall you made on me. The points that are actually anything potentially against me are 3 and 8. I can get behind you using your third dot point. It's relational to a dead scum player, that is fine. However point 8 is part of the back and forth of you not understanding that psyche tells go for everyone and if people are going to be exempt from them it's going to be the people I actually know because I might have prior knowledge of them not adhering with the majority.
That's out of 13 points.
And then I am part of the scum pile? How does that even work? Almost the whole post is just raw information which is construed as being support for a case. Almost all of it doesn't even make up the case. It looks nice. And I remember at least one person saying that the case looked good? What part of it looks good? Is it the length, because that's the only impressive part of it, and it's actually manufactured.
And the worst part of it all, is that this goes for all the reread cases star has done. She has fluffed up posts with stuff that in no way pertains to the case and thinks that makes things look legit. I haven't pulled apart the bins case but if I can be fucked I might, just the show how little there actually is in what Star is using to call people scum.
1. I like to do a full look at the ISO and note everything that sticks out to me, break it down in one post, and have all my notes on that particular ISO available to the rest of my town to analyze and look over. I feel that's part of my job for scumhunting and it's something that I'll continue to do. And you're right, not all of it may pertain to the case, but some of it may pertain further down the road. Additionally, I may need to go back and look up something. Looking through my analysis within my posts (re: things that stick out for me) is easier than going back through the individual ISOs every time when I need to look something up.
2. How are you part of the scum pile? Let's look at
#1729. I guess I need to break this down again....
- You refuse to come to your own conclusions and rely on mollie to tell you what's up
- You sheep Zito and do nothing to add a case on MattP
- You question the MattP lynch while voting for MattP, and admit that (1) you haven't read it and (2) it seems kinda easy (Discrediting much?)
- You vote for myko and state that you really aren't reading
- You say you'll ride the game based on gut and who you have town reads on (even though you didn't read the game)
- You go on a tangent about "psychological tells" to make a push on me and rather than ask me questions
- You favor working with mollie, even if you didn't read her as town. Isn't that counterintuitive if you are a townie?
- You felt the need to explain mollie's reasoning, about asking to be nk'd/vigged, rather than let her answer.
That's like the entire thing, my friend.
3. After the above, and the original post, I think it's clear why you are in my scum pile. It's not just "raw information" and yes, mostly all of it makes up the case. It is not "manufactured."
4. Oh look at his discrediting in that last part guys. Can we kill him today, please?
