"A powerful man who doesn't use his power is a coward."
-Odessa,Suikoden I
Deadline
Apologies for the infrequent VCs. I have been very busy and several of this game's post happen while I am asleep.
"A powerful man who doesn't use his power is a coward."
-Odessa,Suikoden I
In post 1098, LicketyQuickety wrote:I went through Klings ISO and saw some Scum hunting. That's an ok sign I guess. I nailed Kling last game we were both in for not doing that and they were Scum who didn't get lynched fwiw.
In post 1101, Titus wrote:In post 1098, LicketyQuickety wrote:I went through Klings ISO and saw some Scum hunting. That's an ok sign I guess. I nailed Kling last game we were both in for not doing that and they were Scum who didn't get lynched fwiw.
Where?
In post 1104, LicketyQuickety wrote:In post 1101, Titus wrote:In post 1098, LicketyQuickety wrote:I went through Klings ISO and saw some Scum hunting. That's an ok sign I guess. I nailed Kling last game we were both in for not doing that and they were Scum who didn't get lynched fwiw.
Where?
IDK.. go through her ISO as see if you see her asking any questions and stuff.
In post 1105, FireKari wrote:I don't know what to say, I had to do some catch up.
Still think Lickety is the lynch for the day.
I might be falling into a confirmation bias and consensus though with everyone else....
In post 1106, Titus wrote:In post 1104, LicketyQuickety wrote:In post 1101, Titus wrote:In post 1098, LicketyQuickety wrote:I went through Klings ISO and saw some Scum hunting. That's an ok sign I guess. I nailed Kling last game we were both in for not doing that and they were Scum who didn't get lynched fwiw.
Where?
IDK.. go through her ISO as see if you see her asking any questions and stuff.
I don't. That's why I asked you.
In post 1108, LicketyQuickety wrote:In post 1106, Titus wrote:In post 1104, LicketyQuickety wrote:In post 1101, Titus wrote:In post 1098, LicketyQuickety wrote:I went through Klings ISO and saw some Scum hunting. That's an ok sign I guess. I nailed Kling last game we were both in for not doing that and they were Scum who didn't get lynched fwiw.
Where?
IDK.. go through her ISO as see if you see her asking any questions and stuff.
I don't. That's why I asked you.
You don't do ISO's?
In post 112, Klingoncelt wrote:In post 106, Ranger wrote:VOTE: BRantz.
Mark: wgeurts.
(I wonder if Varsoon will accept that? If so, wgeurts will confirm when it's been done. If not, then I suppose I need to go through the effort of PMing it.)
This is your only post. Interesting way to come out of the gate....
What does "mark" mean?
In post 280, Klingoncelt wrote:In post 255, Titus wrote:In post 252, Klingoncelt wrote:In post 113, Titus wrote:What do you think of me? I want to know if you like me? :-p
Titus, how could anyone not like you?
Hi.
Elbrin or BM, who is scummier and why?
Between the two, I'd say Elbirn. His play reminds me of Devil Elbirn from Midnight Sun.
In post 452, Klingoncelt wrote:Here ya go Titus:
Blackest Magick (Xtoxm & Pokerface) - 5 posts, 1's RVS, 1's fluff. I can see this sort of thing from Pokerface, but where is Xtoxm?
Brantz - 3 posts, only 1 with any (minimal) level of content.
Bright - WTF???
Elbirn - Is Titus right about him being a wagon sensor? (post 413) What is his connection with Titus? Why isn't he scumreading Jeanne?
FireKari - (post 162) - Are they claiming Oracle? What is AUA? Where's FireBringer?
Jeanne11 - Wants players to prove that they aren't Scum? How the hell is that supposed to happen?
LQ - Weirdly paranoid. Where's the self-confidence?
Pistachi0n - 3 posts, not exactly fluff, but still... it looks like he's trying to make it look like he cares.
Ranger - That "marked" thing bugs me, what is it? And Ranger claims that Wgeurts confirmed it?
Reasonably Rational - Holy cats, the hydra really is reasonably rational! They're the only sane player so far. The posts have content and make sense... Lean Town
Suzune - Seems to be as lost as I am.
Titus - Possibly outs an Oracle and a Sensor, then gets on LQ for rolefishing. Really bad. Then there's the fruit code thing with Elbirn. Are they masons? Neighbors? Lovers? Scum?
Wgeurts - Supposedly confirmed Ranger's "mark" by asking about it, even though Titus and I asked about it too... Otherwise nothing at all... Lean Scum.
In post 455, Klingoncelt wrote:Oh - Pistachion is Lean Scum, I forgot to type in in my reads.
In post 827, Klingoncelt wrote:In post 823, Jeanne11 wrote:Well, I need proof that you're town. And I mean solid proof, not just wishy-washy argument heavily influenced by you.
Jeanne, this is awful.
The only way anyone can prove anything is by mod confirmation or flip.
Exactly what proof have you provided that you are Town?
In post 970, Klingoncelt wrote:In post 902, Reasonably Rational wrote:In post 901, Jeanne11 wrote:Right now? So I would be at night? The night is in 9 days or so, not 'right now'.
You do realize you're implicating yourself?
Can we lynch this please? There's literally no way to read this and I don't want to be staring at end game and still wondering.
I don't want to lynch her yet.
I want to try and figure her out.
Jeanne11- could you give us a reads list, please? I know you have everyone as Scum, but could you put down a sentence or two as to why?
In post 976, Jeanne11 wrote:Okay, here are my reads. They're all gut reads for now.
Well this is true. I would call it temporary aid. At least masons know that everyone present is town.In post 994, wgeurts wrote:Your not masons, otherwise you wouldn't have voted em
Perhaps this is a rule I am unfamiliar with. But Masons can vote masons. I have allowed my masons to do it before in order to keep their teammates from being nightkilled because they would always have a small suspicion on them.In post 997, Jeanne11 wrote:So just because I have voted them, I cannot be in masonry/neighbourhood with them,
In post 1111, Suzune wrote:In post 976, Jeanne11 wrote:Okay, here are my reads. They're all gut reads for now.
I feel like I am a pain with you but, Jeanne, could you give us a little bit of substance.
Well this is true. I would call it temporary aid. At least masons know that everyone present is town.In post 994, wgeurts wrote:Your not masons, otherwise you wouldn't have voted em
Perhaps this is a rule I am unfamiliar with. But Masons can vote masons. I have allowed my masons to do it before in order to keep their teammates from being nightkilled because they would always have a small suspicion on them.In post 997, Jeanne11 wrote:So just because I have voted them, I cannot be in masonry/neighbourhood with them,
I wonder if that is fair considering who is he is fighting against. LQ is logical and reasonable, while Jeanne is passionate and emotional.In post 1006, wgeurts wrote:LQ is spiralling down the ladder towniness in these posts.
In post 1113, Suzune wrote:I wonder if that is fair considering who is he is fighting against.In post 1006, wgeurts wrote:LQ is spiralling down the ladder towniness in these posts.LQ is logical and reasonable, while Jeanne is passionate and emotional.
p-edit- Thank you Reasonably Rational and I apologize for missing it.
In post 1114, Titus wrote:@RR, Quoting Klingon's ISO and saying it's meaningful doesn't explain anything.
In post 1116, Reasonably Rational wrote:In post 1114, Titus wrote:@RR, Quoting Klingon's ISO and saying it's meaningful doesn't explain anything.
I'm not trying to explain anything. I'm just highlighting the pieces that might lead someone to feel she's scum hunting.
-Cerb
In post 1030, LicketyQuickety wrote:looking for how Elb and Suz fit into this,
You are interesting to say the least.In post 1088, wgeurts wrote:Am I now town?
Hm, I do not think so. You post logically and with patience. You read people for more then their words because you gave me a fantastic read once. However, to each their own.In post 1115, LicketyQuickety wrote:In post 1113, Suzune wrote:I wonder if that is fair considering who is he is fighting against.In post 1006, wgeurts wrote:LQ is spiralling down the ladder towniness in these posts.LQ is logical and reasonable, while Jeanne is passionate and emotional.
p-edit- Thank you Reasonably Rational and I apologize for missing it.
Thanks, but you're wrong.
In post 1118, Titus wrote:In post 1116, Reasonably Rational wrote:In post 1114, Titus wrote:@RR, Quoting Klingon's ISO and saying it's meaningful doesn't explain anything.
I'm not trying to explain anything. I'm just highlighting the pieces that might lead someone to feel she's scum hunting.
-Cerb
Do you? Might lead someone isn't exactly a ringing endorsement.