In post 1300, Titus wrote:@LQ, I have learned a shitton from my gambit. If I am alive in a few days, I should have this cracked.
Also, why wouldn't you claim here?
If you have learned a "shitton" ... then you should be able to solve the game. Since you haven't, then what you are actually saying here is:
1.) You hope that with new information as the game progresses, your gambit will yield results ... and if this is the case, you are obviously still delusional and assuming we have absurdly stupid scum. Just about everything you said before triggering the 24 hour period was a lie (which was one of the reasons we voted you), and the idea that scum wouldn't have realized it was a lie is supremely foolish. Any "results" from your gambit are impossible to discern anything from due to WiFoM. You cannot objectively state right now what the results mean, because you don't actually know how scum responded. You have even given contradictory answers for what you expected various groups of people to do (As I recall you mentioned 3 groups: Smart town, dumb town and scum).
2.) You are stalling for time so you can fake your normal VCA, much like in SU. Your play so far seems just like your scum style. In SU you relied on crazy gambits to try and get {he who shall not be named?} and yourself into the town block... but you slipped and tripped and only the actions of honorary scum team member Grapes got you a win. I'm not a big fan of the whole "this feels like another game so it must be the same" approach, so mostly I'm just scum reading you for lying. I came very close to pushing a Lynch all Liars PL case on you.
In post 1319, Titus wrote:@Ranger, what other sites do you play on?
External influences are not allowed. I believe you made reference to this rule when you dodged Wguerts "gentleman's bet" that if you were wrong you had to wear your shame in your signature for awhile, correct?