we lynched 3p over Mafia, and it's all ika's fault!!!!
...
You say that like it's a
bad
thing.
Tell what motivation there is for Ika to lie? What happens if Ika is Town? How does that effect their credibility? What happens if Ika is Scum? How do we let them skate by with that kind of play?
PEdit: What is the motivation to lie?
I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.
ika is distrustful of 3P claims. They're basically a policy lynch for him.
Plus, ika's meta is to be antitown more often than not. His mood/mindset needs to be gauged to determine his alignment, not his actions. Otherwise he'd be lynched Day 1 of every game.
I'd actually like him to post more, because his gamesolving gung-ho is a little lacking.
Gonna be honest, Lickety's whole going along with ika at first and then suddenly turning on him once he's got the third parties lynched is hella suspicious.
In post 1253, Davsto wrote:Gonna be honest, Lickety's whole going along with ika at first and then suddenly turning on him once he's got the third parties lynched is hella suspicious.
Do you hear yourself right now?
Was I not clear when I said "we are catching Scum no matter what so there is no reason to not sheep Ika since if Xt isn't MAFIA then we will proceed to vote Ika for not telling the truth"?
You're lack of understanding to what I am actually saying is pretty astounding.
I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.
Tell me, what would scum!ika gain from lying? You're saying that town!ika has no reason to, but I don't think scum!ika has a reason to either, thus it is null.
Tell me, what would scum!ika gain from lying? You're saying that town!ika has no reason to, but I don't think scum!ika has a reason to either, thus it is null.
Kindly tell me why you don't want to lynch someone who is null who has blatantly lied about an investigation's alignment on someone again.
I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.
In post 1253, Davsto wrote:Gonna be honest, Lickety's whole going along with ika at first and then suddenly turning on him once he's got the third parties lynched is hella suspicious.
Do you hear yourself right now?
Was I not clear when I said "we are catching Scum no matter what so there is no reason to not sheep Ika since if Xt isn't MAFIA then
we will proceed to vote Ika for not telling the truth
"?
You're lack of understanding to what I am actually saying is pretty astounding.
This looks like you don't care about ika's actual alignment.
Lying about a result on Xtoxm was the easiest way to get everyone on board with lynching a survivor, it was pretty clever. Survivors only harm town if they stick around and have net negative utility once they are outed as it gives scum one fewer person to target as potential PR, as well as a distraction to dominate daytalk. And we could not rely on Xtoxm to vote with town in LyLo.
VOTE: Firebringer
for being pro-Survivor D1 and not handling pressure from Grib in a town manner. I have other reasons to be suspicious of this slot too but it's best to only hit at those for now.
"I think I no longer believe in monsters as faces in the floor or feral infants or vampires or whatever. I think at seventeen now I believe the only real monsters might be the type of liar where there's simply no way to tell. The ones who give nothing away"
In post 1259, GuiltyLion wrote:Lying about a result on Xtoxm was the easiest way to get everyone on board with lynching a survivor, it was pretty clever
Hey, Lickety, we've found your town-motivation for ika to lie. Now give me one good goddamn reason that scum!ika would lie. Here's some incentive to answer the question this time.
So, ika is scum, and he decided to lie just for the hell of it, in a way that doesn't actually help him at all? It doesn't actually help him win as scum, whilst we've found a townie motivation for it, but you're still sure him lying is alignment indicative?
Hey, look at this guy going after easy shit. Vote staying here. Meep.
In post 1259, GuiltyLion wrote:Lying about a result on Xtoxm was the easiest way to get everyone on board with lynching a survivor, it was pretty clever. Survivors only harm town if they stick around and have net negative utility once they are outed as it gives scum one fewer person to target as potential PR, as well as a distraction to dominate daytalk. And we could not rely on Xtoxm to vote with town in LyLo.
VOTE: Firebringer
for being pro-Survivor D1 and not handling pressure from Grib in a town manner. I have other reasons to be suspicious of this slot too but it's best to only hit at those for now.
"You are the Joker of mafia players" - Oversoul
"last time I was scum with Firebringer
his first post in the scum PT was "yes I rolled scum!"
I decided to post "haha just don't post that in the main thread", but to get up to date on the main thread first.
His first post in the main thread was "yes I rolled scum!" -popsofctown
"You are the Joker of mafia players" - Oversoul
"last time I was scum with Firebringer
his first post in the scum PT was "yes I rolled scum!"
I decided to post "haha just don't post that in the main thread", but to get up to date on the main thread first.
His first post in the main thread was "yes I rolled scum!" -popsofctown
would also lynch firebringer but i prefer this by a decent bit
dear princess celestia, sometimes it can be hard for a shy pony like me to stand up for myself, and when i first tried it, i didn't like the pony i became. but i've learned that standing up for yourself isn't the same as changing who you are. now i know how to put my hoof down without being unpleasant or mean
"You are the Joker of mafia players" - Oversoul
"last time I was scum with Firebringer
his first post in the scum PT was "yes I rolled scum!"
I decided to post "haha just don't post that in the main thread", but to get up to date on the main thread first.
His first post in the main thread was "yes I rolled scum!" -popsofctown