Psycho
farside22 - 1 (Nachomamma8)
Nachomamma8 - 3 (Davsto, EspeciallyTheLies, hiplop)
Thor665 - 1 (farside22)
Not Voting: Ankamius, massive, Thor665, Vedith
5 to lynch
Deadline:(expired on 2015-11-18 22:48:18)
In post 1599, Thor665 wrote:Sure - Cat did basically the same thing though.
In post 1601, Vedith wrote:Also, remind me why Nacho is being voted?
In post 1601, Vedith wrote:Yeah I'm not convinced that Cata is town either still.
In post 1604, Vedith wrote:You've changed your tune...
In post 1604, Vedith wrote:Keep in mind the role that was flipped. Didn't you have a theory on it?
In post 1600, Antihero wrote:It's sad, when a mother has to speak the words that condemn her own son. But I couldn't allow them to believe that I would commit murder. They'll put him away now, as I should have years ago. He was always bad, and in the end he intended to tell them I killed those girls and that man... as if I could do anything but just sit and stare, like one of his stuffed birds. They know I can't move a finger, and I won't. I'll just sit here and be quiet, just in case they do... suspect me. They're probably watching me. Well, let them. Let them see what kind of a person I am. I'm not even going to swat that fly. I hope they are watching... they'll see. They'll see and they'll know, and they'll say, "Why, she wouldn't even harm a fly..."
Psycho
In post 1599, Thor665 wrote:In post 1589, Vedith wrote:Considering Pist tried to push on Dav and then when no one was agreeing he switched his vote/focus straight off.
I think that was a good enough case alone.
Sure - Cat did basically the same thing though.
In post 1590, farside22 wrote:I'd been scum reading pist since day 1 so I don't get how I lack reason I just don't feel like repeating things that no one reads.
Methinks you doth protest too much - especially for such a late vote on him.
In post 1593, Nachomamma8 wrote:Do you see it now?
No.
In post 1594, Nachomamma8 wrote:In post 1588, Thor665 wrote:buddy-buddy Day 1
Have you ever caught me as scum using this tell?
I remember you using it to suspect me in the Crosstown where you neighborized me, and I remember you using it to suspect me in zakk's mini normal, but I don't remember you calling me "buddy-buddy" as scum.
Okay, if we want to analyze this meta quicksand, let's start at the actual basics - what games have I played with you where I was town and you were scum?
In post 1594, Nachomamma8 wrote:One reads list is not a reflection of how much paranoia I have of you as a player.
Sure - but you clearly have not extroverted any paranoia towards me at all this game.
In post 1594, Nachomamma8 wrote:If it makes you feel better, I didn't like how you jumped to my lynch as easily as you have and you certainly aren't far off the list if either farside or Vedith happen to be town!
I "jumped" to you yesterday - the only surprise is how much support there is for you today from people making fun of my reads.
I don't follow this point at all.
In post 1469, farside22 wrote:I need to work on skimming better or reading when things happen.
I thought pist was calling cata scummy in one of her post and it turns out it was just a review of the player.
That said pist comments really didn't sway me away from scum reading her. I voted Nacho most because he is a scum read. I'm more happy with my pist scum read over nacho.
vote: pistachi0n
In post 1607, farside22 wrote:There is wonderful search function. I voted for pist at the start and then moved to nacho and back to pist at the end.
Saying my vote was late is a stretch just to make yourself look better there.
In post 1610, hiplop wrote:etl im town you fuck
In post 1608, Thor665 wrote:In post 1607, farside22 wrote:There is wonderful search function. I voted for pist at the start and then moved to nacho and back to pist at the end.
Saying my vote was late is a stretch just to make yourself look better there.
So your slide onto Nacho and then back onto Pist gives you both reason and clear scum read there?
No, it does neither.
Hiplop also lacked reason, but he had clear intent - you did not, and do not.
What do you think is the "lie" there?
In post 1616, Thor665 wrote:My argument was that your case was based on a playstyle without being aware of Pist's playstyle or caring about it.
That is a valid issue - and does show the emptiness of your case.
Saying you lacked reason is neither true or false, it is an opinion, but it is one I have held for a while and defended with enough validity to support my statement.
And, yes, I think you did just switch back with no reason (functionally your reason was, at best "yay, more votes on this scumspect as opposed to other one" except you're not claiming that now and trying to play up some deeper design, which looks skeevy to me) when I think your initial push was weak and the Nacho leap potentially opportunistic.
In post 1620, hiplop wrote:Keep in mins- pistachio was an incredibly valuable scum role
I definitely can see scum sticking neck out to keep him safe, fwiw!
In post 1621, farside22 wrote:You were making points on hippy with the same thought process's so....?
In post 1621, farside22 wrote:My scum read didn't magically change, I even explained myself on why I switched off of pist.
I also made points on Nacho, switching between 2 scum reads is normal.
Your making this about a vote on 2 players I was scum reading at the time.