In post 526, Davsto wrote:But stuff like when I put the vote on Ranger before I went to bed, you immediately jump to paint it as the potential scum motivation rather than me, you know, wanting to vote Ranger.
My interpretation makes more sense considering how you didn't vote Ranger in the first place after showing suspicion towards her. It shows more of a mind towards your appearances than finding scum: if you really thought Ranger was suspicious why not vote her at the first opportunity because if you find someone scummy then you should pressure them.
Sure, it's not a strong reason on its own because a town member can easily do things like that, but it still leans towards you being scum more than it leans towards you being town.
I never said it was all meta, don't misrepresent me, I just said your meta case on me was a flat-out lie.
You completely ignored almost the entirety of the case then, only responding to the slight amount of meta I used. My "meta case" was a single sentence saying that you were acting uncharacteristically. You then gave reasons for why you were acting uncharacteristically, sure, fine, I understand and won't read you using meta if you have real life stuff going on. The meta case is not relevant to your alignment, we have established that.
It was not a flat-out lie in any case, I maintain that you were more engaged in the other game than this one. I don't see how something that subjective could even be a lie.