In post 37, Randomnamechange wrote:
I'm not liking the rush of innocent votes. Doesn't gain us anything. Feels like scum not wanting to risk their buddy.
In post 63, Randomnamechange wrote:RUSHING through lynches isn't going to help us at all.
In post 63, Randomnamechange wrote:NIGHT phases are going to be very important so we can get flips. KILLS by the mafia are going to be very unlikely to go through. RUSHING through lynches isn't going to help us at all.
NIGHT...KILLS...RUSHING
In post 77, Makoto Nanaya wrote:In post 63, Randomnamechange wrote:NIGHT phases are going to be very important so we can get flips. KILLS by the mafia are going to be very unlikely to go through. RUSHING through lynches isn't going to help us at all.
Or
NIGHT...KILLS...RUSHING
Seems concerning.
In post 63, Randomnamechange wrote:NIGHT phases are going to be very important so we can get flips. KILLS by the mafia are going to be very unlikely to go through. RUSHING through lynches isn't going to help us at all.
In post 84, Espeonage wrote:I haven't been reading the game bc stuff, but I went back and looked and I will only be happy with going one lynch if we force scum to make a successful kill by continually going to night until one gets through.
In post 84, Espeonage wrote:I haven't been reading the game bc stuff, but I went back and looked and I will only be happy with going one lynch if we force scum to make a successful kill by continually going to night until one gets through.
In post 89, Espeonage wrote:That's all I have regarding the post you mentioned. What you after?
In post 17, Espeonage wrote:Worst case scenario is that scum do get a kill through which is even then unlikely.
In post 26, Espeonage wrote:I think that in practice it's not going to be as difficult as it first seems for kills to go through.
In post 5, IceGuy wrote:Since we can't really do RVS, let's discuss strategy.
To me, it seems like our best bet would be to go into night after every lynch at first, because it's unlikely four or three Mafia will all choose the same player, and we gain more information that way. When we're down to two Mafia, nightkills are more of a risk, so we just lynch until the game ends.
In post 17, Espeonage wrote:I feel like assessing our flips is an important part of play as we need to see how many scum we have dead, for both relational tells and to give us our next number of lynches number.
![:]](./images/smilies/icon_smiling.png "Cheerful Smile"){kind=icon}
In post 39, sun_danyun wrote:Here's the thing though: we are currently in mylo, with 4 mafia and 9 town, as I'm pretty sure the rules didn't say anything about needing to know the flips of everyone killed before a win condition is met. The first lynch must hit scum. I support Miko's idea of psuedovotes, we really can't afford to lynch at random right now.
In post 51, Randomnamechange wrote:I agree we should only lynch once today. The chances of scum making an NK are so low that we don't really sacrifice anything in return for having a flip before the next lynch.
In post 74, itlepip wrote:VOTE: Rushing
I feel like they are focusing way to much on the pokemon gimmick when they started to get questioned.
In post 85, Buckwild wrote:In post 84, Espeonage wrote:I haven't been reading the game bc stuff, but I went back and looked and I will only be happy with going one lynch if we force scum to make a successful kill by continually going to night until one gets through.
Why are you not reading, and why going back to something we semi-agreed on already? I can't believe I didn't catch the random comment. It does look like a joke now that I see it, but thats an ez answer for scum trying to get some coordination together. I'm willing to lynch random, although I want to see some pressure on Espeonage as well today. Since we are doing fake votes, why can't I do two?
FakeVote: Espeonage
FakeVote: Random
In post 92, Slaughterhouse Five wrote:In post 5, IceGuy wrote:Since we can't really do RVS, let's discuss strategy.
To me, it seems like our best bet would be to go into night after every lynch at first, because it's unlikely four or three Mafia will all choose the same player, and we gain more information that way. When we're down to two Mafia, nightkills are more of a risk, so we just lynch until the game ends.
It also seems far more entertaining to lynch everyone except for the TOP TWO TOWNIES or even just lynch a bunch of people until we think everyone is town and then see how well we did. I also don't see the benefit of your plan even - every time we lynch and don't go to night it's like mafia missed a nightkill; I mean I guess associatives are nice but not even giving them the chance to make a kill seems better for our wincon and for our souls.
In post 17, Espeonage wrote:I feel like assessing our flips is an important part of play as we need to see how many scum we have dead, for both relational tells and to give us our next number of lynches number.
Why?
I don't need to see how many scum have died, I just need to stop scumreading people.
And if I've stopped scumreading people, then I start lynching the least town or offer myself up for death and I'm pretty fine with that actually.
Also fun!!!!!!
This vote sucked!!!
Maybe we can kill you first :]
In post 51, Randomnamechange wrote:I agree we should only lynch once today. The chances of scum making an NK are so low that we don't really sacrifice anything in return for having a flip before the next lynch.
Except a chance at scum making a kill and a chance to make history.
[/quote]
In post 74, itlepip wrote:VOTE: Rushing
I feel like they are focusing way to much on the pokemon gimmick when they started to get questioned.
This also totally doesn't make sense :/
In post 85, Buckwild wrote:In post 84, Espeonage wrote:I haven't been reading the game bc stuff, but I went back and looked and I will only be happy with going one lynch if we force scum to make a successful kill by continually going to night until one gets through.
Why are you not reading, and why going back to something we semi-agreed on already? I can't believe I didn't catch the random comment. It does look like a joke now that I see it, but thats an ez answer for scum trying to get some coordination together. I'm willing to lynch random, although I want to see some pressure on Espeonage as well today. Since we are doing fake votes, why can't I do two?
FakeVote: Espeonage
FakeVote: Random
Slaughterhouse Five wrote:In post 39, sun_danyun wrote:Here's the thing though: we are currently in mylo, with 4 mafia and 9 town, as I'm pretty sure the rules didn't say anything about needing to know the flips of everyone killed before a win condition is met. The first lynch must hit scum. I support Miko's idea of psuedovotes, we really can't afford to lynch at random right now.
This isn't MyLo, unless half of 12 is now suddenly 4
In post 51, Randomnamechange wrote:I agree we should only lynch once today. The chances of scum making an NK are so low that we don't really sacrifice anything in return for having a flip before the next lynch.
Except a chance at scum making a kill and a chance to make history.
In post 74, itlepip wrote:VOTE: Rushing
I feel like they are focusing way to much on the pokemon gimmick when they started to get questioned.
This also totally doesn't make sense :/
