In post 1648, Kop wrote:Marge, you had a theory on me. Did you ever indulge into sharing that theory?
I was thinking you were scum with etl.
Etl town then I figure ocean/persivul scum.
In post 1648, Kop wrote:Marge, you had a theory on me. Did you ever indulge into sharing that theory?
In post 1649, Persivul wrote:In post 1646, Marge wrote:I think you and ocean are fake claiming scum buckets.
What's the scum motivation for the fakeclaim? I could understand that charge if he claimed when he was about to be lynched, but he was at L-3 when he claimed, and had been successfully defending all game. He wanted to claim to avoid another wasted day arguing with ETL, who was obviously in a tunnel she couldn't get out of.
As for VCA, who was scum pushing that wagon....wait it was you.
As you note, the question is why? I was on ETL because I proved beyond a doubt that she lied to push my wagon. Town shouldn't need to lie to push a wagon, as I stated. So...why were you on it?
In post 1652, Persivul wrote:
Did you see my analysis? Kop's claim does finish it. Unless we get another PR claim, we have a valid setup.
In post 1651, Marge wrote:In post 1649, Persivul wrote:In post 1646, Marge wrote:I think you and ocean are fake claiming scum buckets.
What's the scum motivation for the fakeclaim? I could understand that charge if he claimed when he was about to be lynched, but he was at L-3 when he claimed, and had been successfully defending all game. He wanted to claim to avoid another wasted day arguing with ETL, who was obviously in a tunnel she couldn't get out of.
As for VCA, who was scum pushing that wagon....wait it was you.
As you note, the question is why? I was on ETL because I proved beyond a doubt that she lied to push my wagon. Town shouldn't need to lie to push a wagon, as I stated. So...why were you on it?
It's probably lynch lose.
One more mislynch and you win right?
So unless you know for fact there is only 2 scum left you let me know.
In post 1653, Marge wrote:Also I note pervisal has not said anything about anyone else as scum.
Faking scum reads is hard for scum to do.
In post 1655, Persivul wrote:In post 1651, Marge wrote:In post 1649, Persivul wrote:In post 1646, Marge wrote:I think you and ocean are fake claiming scum buckets.
What's the scum motivation for the fakeclaim? I could understand that charge if he claimed when he was about to be lynched, but he was at L-3 when he claimed, and had been successfully defending all game. He wanted to claim to avoid another wasted day arguing with ETL, who was obviously in a tunnel she couldn't get out of.
As for VCA, who was scum pushing that wagon....wait it was you.
As you note, the question is why? I was on ETL because I proved beyond a doubt that she lied to push my wagon. Town shouldn't need to lie to push a wagon, as I stated. So...why were you on it?
It's probably lynch lose.
One more mislynch and you win right?
So unless you know for fact there is only 2 scum left you let me know.
This is classic scum!farside - quote a question, then make a completely unrelated statement and pretend that it's been answered.
In post 1657, Persivul wrote:In post 1653, Marge wrote:Also I note pervisal has not said anything about anyone else as scum.
Faking scum reads is hard for scum to do.
Says she who dodges requests for reads.
Uh-huh. My vote, when I was one of the earliest and hardest pushers of EspeciallyTheLies, was bad.ProHawk wrote:Ranger or Kop for me. Highly unlikely scum didn't participate in the lynching and both of those votes were bad.
What onKop wrote:I protected Ranger night three.
This was your vote prior to your switch onto ETL.VOTE: Ranger
I've generally got an aversion to claiming. If everyone else thinks I should, then sure, I will, but otherwise, I'd let the scum keep guessing.Persivul wrote:Ranger, please claim.
In post 1666, Ranger wrote:I've generally got an aversion to claiming. If everyone else thinks I should, then sure, I will, but otherwise, I'd let the scum keep guessing.Persivul wrote:Ranger, please claim.
The important thing, though, is that I'm HIGHLY skeptical of Kop's doctor claim, and I want you to please keep that in mind.
In post 1663, Ranger wrote:I'm holding back the urge to vote Kop right now because this is lylo.
But I don't buy that claim. I'd be the last person Kop would protect, and it reeks of BS.
In post 1663, Ranger wrote:I'm holding back the urge to vote Kop right now because this is lylo.
But I don't buy that claim. I'd be the last person Kop would protect, and it reeks of BS.
In post 1671, Kop wrote:I'm thinking a no lynch here might be an option.
In post 1672, Persivul wrote:
In post 1671, Kop wrote:I'm thinking a no lynch here might be an option.
Why are you two saying it's mylo when it's clear from the setup and flips that we're almost certainly in lylo?