In post 254, Aronis wrote:
Srsly? Are you a jester? Bc otherwise wtf are you doing?
No, but people seem hell driven on my lynch for god knows reasons. I think if we eliminate all the people claiming one slot, we got a good chance of sorting everyone else out.
I doubt every person claiming Protective is a protective.
If you're town, getting lynched is not in your best interest and town's best interest. And same thing goes for being mafia/sk/whatever else except Jester.
Give me a legitimate reason why mollie is town. She has randomly voted half the people in the game with no explanation and failed to massclaim despite the town's requests. That's not protown behavior.
I would not be opposed to this. If we have a better scumread I say go for that instead, but other than the possibility of them being a Jester, lynching them won't harm us and we have no shortage of lynches today.
I definitely agree with this. One of the neutral should be lynched. I know that they won't harm us right now, but later in the game they will because of course they don't care who gets lynched. The scum will most likely not kill them. It would be harder in the later part of the game to lynch a scum because there are some players who simply don't care at all.
Shut up, we aren't lynching a neutral, its a waste of a lynch.
It's not a waste. Why wait for the amnesiac to turn mafia and then lynch him when we could just get rid of him right now? And a lyncher won't help town and a survivor can just as easily help the mafia instead of the town.
But if Frogger were anti-town, why would he claim neutral to begin with? The fact that he had the gut to claim neutral makes me trust him a bit. The same does not apply to Yreckt though, as he claimed last.
@Idiot Savant: Don't drag previous games into this one please
I don't think early bird gets the worm is the best steategy or policy.
When the opposition are here you tell them nothing except where the toilets are, but you lie about that right. Fuckity bye
fire, how about a compermise. we got 3 lycnhes today.
if she does not claim after the second lynch i will not stop you form lynchign her, deal? your right i do liek mollie, but what you dont understand is how deep its runs to me. she means the world to me. the fact i am finally able to play with her again means a lot and having her lycnh day fucking one (on the first lycnh no less) is the last thing i want.
In post 275, Aronis wrote:Give me a legitimate reason why mollie is town. She has randomly voted half the people in the game with no explanation and failed to massclaim despite the town's requests. That's not protown behavior.
i have made it clear i do not want her to be the first fucking lynch. if she continues i wil be more then happy to set aside and lynch her but before then no.
I'll just vote for someone who hasn't claimed for now.. VOTE: Ranger
I'll be back later today.
@Kraeg: You didn't say yourself that it was an excuse, I know that. But the fact that you hadn't claimed at that point, makes it possible to make the interpretation that I made. If a mafia is being pressured to claim against his/her will, wouldn't he/she naturally critizise the massclaiming?
And please, if you want to talk about things not part of the game, please do it outside this thread. I don't want to waste time reading irrelevant posts.
In post 264, Professor Bozo wrote:fire, im gonna say this once, dont even make that kind of comment towards me aagin about mollie, you dont even knwo how much shit she ahs helped me though.
i owe her more then ican ever give and i will be damned before i see her lynched right now
This is a game. And mollie could very easily be scum. What she has done outside of this game has nothing to do with her alignment and to use that as a reason to keep her alive when she has exhibited anti-town behavior in the game is ridiculous.
"You are the Joker of mafia players" - Oversoul
"last time I was scum with Firebringer
his first post in the scum PT was "yes I rolled scum!"
I decided to post "haha just don't post that in the main thread", but to get up to date on the main thread first.
His first post in the main thread was "yes I rolled scum!" -popsofctown
In post 264, Professor Bozo wrote:fire, im gonna say this once, dont even make that kind of comment towards me aagin about mollie, you dont even knwo how much shit she ahs helped me though.
i owe her more then ican ever give and i will be damned before i see her lynched right now
This is a game. And mollie could very easily be scum. What she has done outside of this game has nothing to do with her alignment and to use that as a reason to keep her alive when she has exhibited anti-town behavior in the game is ridiculous.
In post 279, Zymf wrote:I'll just vote for someone who hasn't claimed for now.. VOTE: Ranger
I'll be back later today.
@Kraeg: You didn't say yourself that it was an excuse, I know that. But the fact that you hadn't claimed at that point, makes it possible to make the interpretation that I made. If a mafia is being pressured to claim against his/her will, wouldn't he/she naturally critizise the massclaiming?
I believ ranger already soft claimed a govt role.
When the opposition are here you tell them nothing except where the toilets are, but you lie about that right. Fuckity bye
jsut do me a favor and leave her off the table for lynch 1. if she doesnt claim by then i will not stop on lynch 2. if we dont by then and she still hasnt i will ram the lynch myself.
i just, want to play and not be triggered every 5 seconds
In post 275, Aronis wrote:If you're town, getting lynched is not in your best interest and town's best interest. And same thing goes for being mafia/sk/whatever else except Jester.
This is typical town rhetoric 101.
My death would confirm my role and slot, so it will help narrow down the search for scum.
In this game since categories are known, my death CAN HELP TOWN.
In post 275, Aronis wrote:
It's not a waste. Why wait for the amnesiac to turn mafia and then lynch him when we could just get rid of him right now? And a lyncher won't help town and a survivor can just as easily help the mafia instead of the town.
YES IT IS!
ITS NOT NARROWING DOWN THE TOWN CLAIMS
ITS ONLY ELIMINATING NEUTRAL PLAYERS.
"You are the Joker of mafia players" - Oversoul
"last time I was scum with Firebringer
his first post in the scum PT was "yes I rolled scum!"
I decided to post "haha just don't post that in the main thread", but to get up to date on the main thread first.
His first post in the main thread was "yes I rolled scum!" -popsofctown
"You are the Joker of mafia players" - Oversoul
"last time I was scum with Firebringer
his first post in the scum PT was "yes I rolled scum!"
I decided to post "haha just don't post that in the main thread", but to get up to date on the main thread first.
His first post in the main thread was "yes I rolled scum!" -popsofctown
This is ridiculous. We're not going to put someone off the table for lynch based on reasons outside of the game. If there's a reason to vote for her, she should be voted. If there's none, then she won't. But we're not giving free passes.
In post 285, Professor Bozo wrote:jsut do me a favor and leave her off the table for lynch 1. if she doesnt claim by then i will not stop on lynch 2. if we dont by then and she still hasnt i will ram the lynch myself.
i just, want to play and not be triggered every 5 seconds
In post 290, Kraeg wrote:This is ridiculous. We're not going to put someone off the table for lynch based on reasons outside of the game. If there's a reason to vote for her, she should be voted. If there's none, then she won't. But we're not giving free passes.
too fucking bad, i already made it clear how i want it
In post 285, Professor Bozo wrote:jsut do me a favor and leave her off the table for lynch 1. if she doesnt claim by then i will not stop on lynch 2. if we dont by then and she still hasnt i will ram the lynch myself.
i just, want to play and not be triggered every 5 seconds
In post 275, Aronis wrote:If you're town, getting lynched is not in your best interest and town's best interest. And same thing goes for being mafia/sk/whatever else except Jester.
This is typical town rhetoric 101.
My death would confirm my role and slot, so it will help narrow down the search for scum.
In this game since categories are known, my death CAN HELP TOWN.
In post 275, Aronis wrote:
It's not a waste. Why wait for the amnesiac to turn mafia and then lynch him when we could just get rid of him right now? And a lyncher won't help town and a survivor can just as easily help the mafia instead of the town.
YES IT IS!
ITS NOT NARROWING DOWN THE TOWN CLAIMS
ITS ONLY ELIMINATING NEUTRAL PLAYERS.
DO YOU NOT GET HOW TO WIN THIS?!?!?!?!?!
Yes, I do.
My win condition says to eliminate all threats to the town. Survivors, Lynchers, and Amnesiacs can and will pose a threat.
"You are the Joker of mafia players" - Oversoul
"last time I was scum with Firebringer
his first post in the scum PT was "yes I rolled scum!"
I decided to post "haha just don't post that in the main thread", but to get up to date on the main thread first.
His first post in the main thread was "yes I rolled scum!" -popsofctown
In post 290, Kraeg wrote:This is ridiculous. We're not going to put someone off the table for lynch based on reasons outside of the game. If there's a reason to vote for her, she should be voted. If there's none, then she won't. But we're not giving free passes.
too fucking bad, i already made it clear how i want it
In post 285, Professor Bozo wrote:jsut do me a favor and leave her off the table for lynch 1. if she doesnt claim by then i will not stop on lynch 2. if we dont by then and she still hasnt i will ram the lynch myself.
i just, want to play and not be triggered every 5 seconds
Lol did you just call the one guy you're arguing with everyone in the negative? It's just one guy. I was thinking we were gonna lynch in the surplus of roles and to the day a third party.
When the opposition are here you tell them nothing except where the toilets are, but you lie about that right. Fuckity bye
![:]](./images/smilies/icon_smiling.png "Cheerful Smile"){kind=icon}