Blitz 5: Netherspite's Blitz SORM Mafia [Game Over]

This forum was a trial run for quick games with deadlines no more than 96 hours per Day. Please see more here
User avatar
Fro99er
Fro99er
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Fro99er
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 16952
Joined: April 2, 2015

Post Post #475 (ISO) » Fri Nov 13, 2015 9:22 am

Post by Fro99er »

VOTE: Aronis
"I officially announce Fro99er the king of guilties because this is the second time he has guiltied a slot I was really unsure about.
Heil King Froggo.
Ribbit ribbit." -Transcend
User avatar
Hippy Love
Hippy Love
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Hippy Love
Goon
Goon
Posts: 820
Joined: August 29, 2015

Post Post #476 (ISO) » Fri Nov 13, 2015 9:24 am

Post by Hippy Love »

In post 469, Aronis wrote:
In post 414, Hippy Love wrote:
In post 411, Firebringer wrote:VOTE: Zymf

We really should lynch all prot claims first.
also we should have gotten everyones claim in first too...

LOOKING AT HIPPY LOVE WHO STILL HASNT CLAIMED YET WHO WAS READY TO LYCNH!!!!


lemme make this super clear cos you missed the other 2 times I have said it

I am not claiming the only pple who want a claim this early in the game are scum and dummies

I am not going to participate in what I consider to be extremely bad play. am I making myself clear here?

if you wanna lynch me for not participating in what I think is really bad strategy especially then go for it, it will not surprise me since it is the exact same thinking that seems to think mass claiming this early is a great idea.

VOTE: Hippy love

There is a large majority of people who have agreed to the massclaim and have claimed and to refuse like this is anti-town and they should be lynched for it. At this point it's too late to decide to not mass claim and it's not helpful for any1 for them to repeatedly refuse to do so and play this way.


you are not even going to give the pretense of scumhunting are you
User avatar
Professor Bozo
Professor Bozo
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Professor Bozo
Goon
Goon
Posts: 207
Joined: June 24, 2015

Post Post #477 (ISO) » Fri Nov 13, 2015 9:25 am

Post by Professor Bozo »

VOTE: Aronis
User avatar
Professor Bozo
Professor Bozo
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Professor Bozo
Goon
Goon
Posts: 207
Joined: June 24, 2015

Post Post #478 (ISO) » Fri Nov 13, 2015 9:26 am

Post by Professor Bozo »

mollie?
User avatar
Netherspite
Netherspite
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Netherspite
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3835
Joined: September 7, 2014
Location: Koh Samui

Post Post #479 (ISO) » Fri Nov 13, 2015 9:26 am

Post by Netherspite »

VoteCount 1.16


Smithereens (4):
hi im Yakko, farside22, Yreckt, Zymf
Hippy Love (2):
Firebringer, Aronis
Aronis (3):
MarioManiac4, Fro99er, Idiot Savant

Not Voting (6):
Jeanne11, Hippy Love, ForWhomTheJellyRolls, Ranger, Dwlee99, Smithereens

With 15 players alive, it takes
8
votes to lynch someone.

The deadline is in
(expired on 2015-11-15 01:15:11)


Notes:

  • MarioManiac4
    revealed himself as a
    Town Marshall
    . Town may perform up to 2 more lynches today.
Now modding:
Netherspite's SORM Mafia III
(Day 2)
User avatar
Hippy Love
Hippy Love
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Hippy Love
Goon
Goon
Posts: 820
Joined: August 29, 2015

Post Post #480 (ISO) » Fri Nov 13, 2015 9:28 am

Post by Hippy Love »

I love how the most protown player in this game besides yakko is the claimed third party

VOTE: aronis
User avatar
Hippy Love
Hippy Love
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Hippy Love
Goon
Goon
Posts: 820
Joined: August 29, 2015

Post Post #481 (ISO) » Fri Nov 13, 2015 9:30 am

Post by Hippy Love »

In post 478, Professor Bozo wrote:mollie?


I am against mass claiming i always have been. you know this.

you know what I find fascinating about "game breaking" strategies is that they never very game breaking.
User avatar
Jeanne11
Jeanne11
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Jeanne11
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3461
Joined: March 11, 2015

Post Post #482 (ISO) » Fri Nov 13, 2015 9:31 am

Post by Jeanne11 »

VOTE: Aronis
User avatar
Professor Bozo
Professor Bozo
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Professor Bozo
Goon
Goon
Posts: 207
Joined: June 24, 2015

Post Post #483 (ISO) » Fri Nov 13, 2015 9:31 am

Post by Professor Bozo »

In post 481, Hippy Love wrote:
In post 478, Professor Bozo wrote:mollie?


I am against mass claiming i always have been. you know this.

you know what I find fascinating about "game breaking" strategies is that they never very game breaking.


But we are trying to show you that with the set rolelist we have we can at least narrow everyones claims to a certain catagory and then when an impossible role exist we lynch it cus they are lying.

is everything ok mollie?
User avatar
MarioManiac4
MarioManiac4
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
MarioManiac4
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 9179
Joined: May 1, 2015

Post Post #484 (ISO) » Fri Nov 13, 2015 9:31 am

Post by MarioManiac4 »

In post 480, Hippy Love wrote:I love how the most protown player in this game besides yakko is the claimed third party

VOTE: aronis

:(
User avatar
MarioManiac4
MarioManiac4
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
MarioManiac4
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 9179
Joined: May 1, 2015

Post Post #485 (ISO) » Fri Nov 13, 2015 9:35 am

Post by MarioManiac4 »

I don't really see ranger!town that much
Willing to vote Aronis or Ranger, today.
User avatar
Yreckt
Yreckt
Townie
User avatar
User avatar
Yreckt
Townie
Townie
Posts: 16
Joined: June 18, 2011

Post Post #486 (ISO) » Fri Nov 13, 2015 9:46 am

Post by Yreckt »

Sure!

VOTE: Aronis
User avatar
Hippy Love
Hippy Love
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Hippy Love
Goon
Goon
Posts: 820
Joined: August 29, 2015

Post Post #487 (ISO) » Fri Nov 13, 2015 9:47 am

Post by Hippy Love »

In post 484, MarioManiac4 wrote:
In post 480, Hippy Love wrote:I love how the most protown player in this game besides yakko is the claimed third party

VOTE: aronis

:(


sorry. and you. <3

@ ika - this is why I hate playing with you, you don't play the tape all the way through. I try to avoid open set ups like the plague but there is ALWAYS some1 who thinks they have a gamebreaking strategy and the next thing you know the game is over, town lost and a bunch of pple are wandering around going "oh how did that happen". all it does is create 1 gigantic d1 mess, pple are picking up on false positives, you aren't playing the tape all the way through and you aren't asking yourself why do you think scum wld think this is a good idea. show me a game ON THIS SITE where d1 mass claim worked out and then mebbe I will listen. until then no.
User avatar
Aronis
Aronis
Just here for the Pagetop!
User avatar
User avatar
Aronis
Just here for the Pagetop!
Just here for the Pagetop!
Posts: 6580
Joined: January 18, 2014
Location: Somewhere

Post Post #488 (ISO) » Fri Nov 13, 2015 9:52 am

Post by Aronis »

In post 475, Fro99er wrote:VOTE: Aronis

In post 477, Professor Bozo wrote:VOTE: Aronis

In post 482, Jeanne11 wrote:VOTE: Aronis

In post 486, Yreckt wrote:Sure!

VOTE: Aronis

Wtf? Did I miss the part about a mafia mass silencer role somewhere?
User avatar
MarioManiac4
MarioManiac4
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
MarioManiac4
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 9179
Joined: May 1, 2015

Post Post #489 (ISO) » Fri Nov 13, 2015 9:53 am

Post by MarioManiac4 »

Mollie I see your point
I think though that now we do have claims we have 4 government ones
All town randoms would have to be government for no scum to be in the mix
This would make no two claims that does not conflict a non-random slot town
Two of [smith, yakko, jelly] and two of [fire, kraeg, savant] cannot be town
Then we have some that haven't claimed and it's rather unlikely there is not at least one scum in government claims
User avatar
ForWhomTheJellyRolls
ForWhomTheJellyRolls
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
ForWhomTheJellyRolls
Goon
Goon
Posts: 388
Joined: June 24, 2014

Post Post #490 (ISO) » Fri Nov 13, 2015 9:56 am

Post by ForWhomTheJellyRolls »

mass claiming isn't game breaking but it can make it harder for scum to maneuver, so I'm in support of it. I know I've had trouble as scum before when people massclaimed like this (But I don't recall if it was day 1 or if it was this site even) Then again I have trouble no mater what role I am but that's neither here nor their. I doubt Hippy and Fire fighting each other is going to get anywhere though.

I was liking a Zymf lynch but it looks like that can be avoided for now.

VOTE: Smithereens
"A hidden truth supports everything. Find it, and win." - Ramayana
"Nothing is true, everything is permitted."

Do you have the need for Mafia de Cuba?
User avatar
Aronis
Aronis
Just here for the Pagetop!
User avatar
User avatar
Aronis
Just here for the Pagetop!
Just here for the Pagetop!
Posts: 6580
Joined: January 18, 2014
Location: Somewhere

Post Post #491 (ISO) » Fri Nov 13, 2015 9:57 am

Post by Aronis »

In post 485, MarioManiac4 wrote:I don't really see ranger!town that much
Willing to vote Aronis or Ranger, today.

How do you see me?

Why do you think ranger is not town?

When do you plan on explaining why we lynched Kraeg?
User avatar
MarioManiac4
MarioManiac4
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
MarioManiac4
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 9179
Joined: May 1, 2015

Post Post #492 (ISO) » Fri Nov 13, 2015 10:00 am

Post by MarioManiac4 »

The Smith wagon is so easy.
I think it is scum-led ATM.

Pedit: A. We had three lynches and I wanted maximum info.
B. His posts felt calculating and theory-based.
User avatar
Professor Bozo
Professor Bozo
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Professor Bozo
Goon
Goon
Posts: 207
Joined: June 24, 2015

Post Post #493 (ISO) » Fri Nov 13, 2015 10:01 am

Post by Professor Bozo »

In post 487, Hippy Love wrote:@ ika - this is why I hate playing with you, you don't play the tape all the way through.


I dont fully understand (i think i do) but i feel like i am playing the tape all the way, i explained that me and fire played this variation before cus its basicly a SC2 mafia mod game that gets broken by the massclaim

I try to avoid open set ups like the plague but there is ALWAYS some1 who thinks they have a gamebreaking strategy and the next thing you know the game is over, town lost and a bunch of pple are wandering around going "oh how did that happen".


first game town should of won but lost due to timeframe

all it does is create 1 gigantic d1 mess, pple are picking up on false positives, you aren't playing the tape all the way through and you aren't asking yourself why do you think scum wld think this is a good idea. show me a game ON THIS SITE where d1 mass claim worked out and then mebbe I will listen. until then no.


See that game above, i was scum and i did it as scum knowing it is optimal play cus it narrows the pool of claims i could of escaped from. I feel like i am playing the tape all the way and that my expeince of playing such setup is how it is.

im sorry mollie. i wanted to make it enjoyable but apprently i did the opposite for you
User avatar
Professor Bozo
Professor Bozo
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Professor Bozo
Goon
Goon
Posts: 207
Joined: June 24, 2015

Post Post #494 (ISO) » Fri Nov 13, 2015 10:01 am

Post by Professor Bozo »

sigh i fucked up quote tags again
User avatar
Hippy Love
Hippy Love
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Hippy Love
Goon
Goon
Posts: 820
Joined: August 29, 2015

Post Post #495 (ISO) » Fri Nov 13, 2015 10:04 am

Post by Hippy Love »

In post 489, MarioManiac4 wrote:Mollie I see your point
I think though that now we do have claims we have 4 government ones
All town randoms would have to be government for no scum to be in the mix
This would make no two claims that does not conflict a non-random slot town
Two of [smith, yakko, jelly] and two of [fire, kraeg, savant] cannot be town
Then we have some that haven't claimed and it's rather unlikely there is not at least one scum in government claims


and it is unlikely that all 3 of far, jeanne and I are all town. I don't think the game can be broken that easily I mean I wld love to be proven wrong but so far every time some1 tries to do a massclaim on d1 town always loses.

d2 mebbe but on d1? no
User avatar
Hippy Love
Hippy Love
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Hippy Love
Goon
Goon
Posts: 820
Joined: August 29, 2015

Post Post #496 (ISO) » Fri Nov 13, 2015 10:13 am

Post by Hippy Love »

"should have won" is not the same as winning. so no, that game does not qualify as proof that mass claiming on d1 is a good idea.
User avatar
Professor Bozo
Professor Bozo
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Professor Bozo
Goon
Goon
Posts: 207
Joined: June 24, 2015

Post Post #497 (ISO) » Fri Nov 13, 2015 10:18 am

Post by Professor Bozo »

In post 496, Hippy Love wrote:"should have won" is not the same as winning. so no, that game does not qualify as proof that mass claiming on d1 is a good idea.


..........

im sorry.

im gonna go then
User avatar
Hippy Love
Hippy Love
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Hippy Love
Goon
Goon
Posts: 820
Joined: August 29, 2015

Post Post #498 (ISO) » Fri Nov 13, 2015 10:23 am

Post by Hippy Love »

In post 497, Professor Bozo wrote:
In post 496, Hippy Love wrote:"should have won" is not the same as winning. so no, that game does not qualify as proof that mass claiming on d1 is a good idea.


..........

im sorry.

im gonna go then


don't get all pouty I hate that.

give me your assessment of mario as a player and will show you what I mean.
User avatar
Professor Bozo
Professor Bozo
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Professor Bozo
Goon
Goon
Posts: 207
Joined: June 24, 2015

Post Post #499 (ISO) » Fri Nov 13, 2015 10:29 am

Post by Professor Bozo »

In post 498, Hippy Love wrote:
In post 497, Professor Bozo wrote:
In post 496, Hippy Love wrote:"should have won" is not the same as winning. so no, that game does not qualify as proof that mass claiming on d1 is a good idea.


..........

im sorry.

im gonna go then


don't get all pouty I hate that.

give me your assessment of mario as a player and will show you what I mean.


honestly i have not played with mari much so i dunno much about himas a player if thats what your asking.

im sorry i dont mean to get pouty but its jsut... i m sorry mollie i
its jsut ~stuff~

Return to “Blitz Games Trial”