You didn't disprove my points? Every post you make has reinforced them lol
In post 685, Anatole Kuragin wrote:I still think that was about as valid a reason as anyone was voting for at that point in the game. I think it looked manufactured and a weak appeal to anything but logic to try to self-meta himself out of a hole and look like a bullied victim or some shit.
Ok fine, and by this logic Marquis vote is about as valid a reason as anyone was voting for at that point in the game. Instead of responding to his reasoning, you acted like he never explained his vote to begin with. Why did you wait until now to explain why you think Marquis' vote was bad?
In post 685, Anatole Kuragin wrote:I was probably posting something pointless to avoid a prod tbh. I thought my original question was stupid when he replied.
No this was on the same day you had first posted in the thread.
In post 685, Anatole Kuragin wrote:That's because people like you and Marquis have called things I've done in the effort of trying to understand what the fuck you're talking about scummy. Marquis said "eww this post is gross af" with no explanation and fuckwads bought into it. That's frustrating so I was trying to figure out why that worked for next time I'm playing a shitposting scum and need an excuse to lynch someone.
Like I said, I wouldn't have a problem with this if you had followed up on the explanation I gave with something other than a naked vote, or did anything that resembled scum hunting outside of harping on us having no reason to suspect you, but you were only concerned with incorrectly discrediting the ones being vocal about scum reading you.
In post 685, Anatole Kuragin wrote:You bought into Marquis's stupid post and it wasn't even your idea. I have shitty ideas all the time and can't help it, but seeing a shitty idea someone else has and saying "whoa, this guy's got it figured out" is harder to believe. I think you looked at Marquis's post about me and said "this asshole will be easy to lynch."
Ok why didn't you say this before you were called out on it? I'd also like to point out how similar this is to Marquis' reason for voting you (hopping onto an easy stance). So apparently things you deem scummy are automatically "shit reasons" when applied to you?
In post 685, Anatole Kuragin wrote:Fro99er's posting style is BLATANLY anti-town because I know for a fact it makes it difficult for anyone with a low attention span to read it, as well as cluttering the thread and padding his ISO. It's also just very obnoxious.
And here you focus on like the most miniscule thing of the part you quoted instead of addressing what I was actually arguing.
No where in your response did you point out why you thought I was misrepresenting you. You merely stated that you disagreed with what I said. Luckily you're not who I need to convince to lynch you.
So no you did not even come close to dismantling my argument but good effort!
if you're town i'll tell you right now that you should try to avoid what went on in my last double day mini for both of our sakes
