[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 7354727 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null Blitz 1: C9++ (GAME OVER!) - Mafiascum.net
Post
Post #50 (isolation #1) » Sun Nov 01, 2015 9:35 am
Postby Flubbernugget »
Titus even if your play is optimal its going to take some serious time for a proposal to get through to anyone. Is this really a good way to start off a blitz game?
Post
Post #54 (isolation #2) » Sun Nov 01, 2015 9:48 am
Postby Flubbernugget »
I think titus is town too but sadly suggesting a d1 massclaim on day 1 means we can't get good reads on anyone else because both town and scum are going to just yell "titus you're freaking insane"
When town fucks up a claim they show it. Marge had no reaction between claiming and then realizing that probably isn't a good idea. Like some sort of an "oh fuck" feeling to their post. Now compare that to the massive amounts of ate spilled when she got suspected. It doesn't line up with how a genuine game-solver should be thinking
Post
Post #311 (isolation #23) » Mon Nov 02, 2015 8:07 am
Postby Flubbernugget »
In post 273, Kop wrote:Does anybody not find it strange that Blocky has been at L-1 for a while now, and nobody has posted intent or even hammered him. Does this spell an indication that scum are on his wagon?
Post
Post #343 (isolation #24) » Mon Nov 02, 2015 9:38 am
Postby Flubbernugget »
In post 280, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:I'm not really interested in commenting on Titus' gung ho mass claim thing. I'd like to say she's town for it. I think I like Vedith and flubber too. Everyone else is kinda bleh.
I'm a VT.
But it's not a massclaim if everyone is willing to claim
Surely you would want to convince people like me and runner to claim??
Post
Post #472 (isolation #31) » Mon Nov 02, 2015 1:54 pm
Postby Flubbernugget »
In post 359, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:Those of you who aren't voting Persivul need to explain to me why not in a way that doesn't involve "Blocky is better" because he's not. He's a meh lynch. His ISO isn't fantastic but it isn't super scummy either, like Persivul's is. I've pointed out several things wrong here. He hedged on Titus, which I could see as her way of gaining reactions, especially given her call for a wagon on herself off the jump. And understand that it wasn't the idea of mass claim that he hedged on - it was hedging on what he thought it meant about her alignment. "I'm not saying you are or aren't scummy for this... blah blah blah". It's literally disgusting.
Second, he claims that Marge is a better lynch but has literally done nothing at all to further or develop that read, or any other read whatsoever.
And when asked about his read on Blocky, his best answer is "the wagon is bad because votes and my read has dropped." Ok.. what?
When pushed he comes up with some ridiculous non-sequiter to run after in an effort to derail the questioning of him and shift the focus. It is literally nonsense to ask a player why he should vote someone the other person isn't scumreading or pushing.
Come on.
p-edit: posts that I will read.
I've already said that waffling on Titus d1 isn't a scum tell
And I'm not keen on sheeping someone that's questioning the massclaim while participating in it
I just wanted someone to go over the setup with me as I've never played it and the wiki entry is overwhelming.
Spoiler: Massive Theory
Well this will help me explain why massclaim is good so win win.
At the start of the game, the mod rolls 7 percentage dies. These correspond to the various PRs in the game and VTs.
1-50 = T (Townie)
51-65 = C (Cop)
66-75 = D (Doctor)
76-85 = V (Vigilante)
86-95 = M (Mason)
96-100 = B (Blocker)
The number of Ts directly influences how many scum are in the game. There is only one group scum and 50/50 odds of a serial killer.
Each role necessitates how many letters are in the setup. For instance, masons require at least 2 Ms. A full cop requires two Cs. We can eliminate any setup with one or thee Ms as the mod did not confirm an innocent child at the start of the day.
By structuring a mass claim day 1, we can either confirm all the PRs as town or force scum into some hard kill situations, particularly if we don't know about an SK. Neither do scum.
First PR or VT.
If we get a too many letters scenario (eight PRs), we know there must be scum in the PRs pool).
Then we go to number of letters. Full cops would claim dual letters, same with a one shot doctor (as a one shot doctor cannot exist without a full doctor).
Then, we claim the actual letters. Anyone dual letter claiming without a letter underneath is autoscum.
We also know the setup within a handful of possibilities, dependent on actual claims.
Okay first off why was this not the first post you made about massclaim
Second off I'm not lynching through the pr pool to get one fakeclaiming scum
Flubbernugget wrote:Throwing vedith and Ythan in a town pile right now is pretty ew
Read Vedith's posts and tell me they're scum.
They're not.
Ythan's not in the townbloc because he could be scum, but I've seen some very strong town thinking behind his posts, in particular, the thoughts he's had on players like, say, BlockyMan.
If you're against massclaim, why did you sign up Ythan. It happens in almost every run of this setup. It's like hating masons but playing Friends and Enemies.
Yeah um is that the first thing people do in every game because if it was it wouldn't fit ms setup meta
Post
Post #513 (isolation #42) » Tue Nov 03, 2015 2:21 am
Postby Flubbernugget »
In post 497, OceanWind wrote:Scum whiteknighting detected. Persivul didn't "hold his own" in his argument with EspeciallyTheLies. He floundered around and was unable to come up with solid explanations for his stance on the Blocky wagon. Only problem is, I'm not sure if he's scum or just a bad player horrible at articulating his thoughts. Your posts on the other hand look like you are trying to defend Persivul in part for towncred and in part to buddy him as he seems more susceptible than EspeciallyTheLies.
Post
Post #516 (isolation #44) » Tue Nov 03, 2015 2:27 am
Postby Flubbernugget »
In post 500, OceanWind wrote:Please explain how I have been "tearing down" and "promoting focus" on Persivul reads? I don't like Persivul's arguments against EspeciallyTheLies but he seems more like a lost newbie than scum. The clearest scum for me is Ranger who's characterization of Persivul looked like she was sucking up to him to gain his favor because I can't honestly see a townie come to the conclusion that she did.
Who sucks up to newbies d1 in a game that could have a sk and a vig
Post
Post #616 (isolation #46) » Tue Nov 03, 2015 10:38 am
Postby Flubbernugget »
So re 564 your white Knight tell can go fuck itself. You show things in Persivul's play that make it look like he could be scum but then go "but Ranger is the REAL scum because he doesn't see stuff the same way I do"
Like if there was a flip on persuival I would almost get it but he's still alive so really what are you doing
Second time I've been told I don't know how to read because I disagree with something what a fun time this game is
In post 616, Flubbernugget wrote:So re 564 your white Knight tell can go fuck itself. You show things in Persivul's play that make it look like he could be scum but then go "but Ranger is the REAL scum because he doesn't see stuff the same way I do"
Like if there was a flip on persuival I would almost get it but he's still alive so really what are you doing
Second time I've been told I don't know how to read because I disagree with something what a fun time this game is
I'll re-explain so it's crystal clear. I don't see the attributes I used to describe Persivul as scum-motivated. More specifically, I think floundering around and flailing is indicative more of a newbie than of scum. I was null on Persivul at that point. His subsequent posts gave me a townread.
Woah woah woah so now someone was white knighting a town read of yours that has a very aggressive player trying to wagon them?
Post
Post #736 (isolation #50) » Tue Nov 03, 2015 4:27 pm
Postby Flubbernugget »
In post 622, OceanWind wrote:Flubber, why are you changing the goalposts rather than defend your position?
You first thought I was scumreading Persivul and that I was sheeping EspeciallyTheLies's read and you couldn't understand why I'm voting Ranger over Persivul.
I clarify that I don't think Persivul is scum and I think Ranger was whiteknighting Persivul.
You now change your argument to "I don't buy someone is white-knighting a town-read of yours."
At this point, I'd have expected town to go "oh, okay, I misinterpreted your post." But you are concocting new arguments as you go along.
How does misreading something equate to changing goalposts?
The proper interpretation of your posting is scummier than the improper interpretation
basic concepts of scumhunting and what is and isn't scummy
.
I see people throwing around
so much bullshit I seriously have no idea who is actually scum or just an idiot who has no idea how to catch scum
.
I literally do not give a flying fuck, Titus. I was a replacement to that game and didn't read it. You're going to compare it to a game I started in? Very different scene and you know it. You also know exactly what level of skill I'm at, so I don't really need to be elitist.
Just want to point out what I bolded,
1)
You should know the meta changes, that one persons tells are different from another. That what scum do changes and that town must change with them and adopt those principles to adjust.
We can all go by textbook ways of playing, but guess what? It WONT WORK!
Why? Cause scum will avoid textbook tells and actions.
Their is no universal way of finding scum.
You should respect each persons way of trying to find it, whether you agree or disagree.
You clearly don't respect anyones other methods and think yours is superior and the only true way.
You are a elitist.
2)
Then you should try adjusting and figuring out a new method because if your previous guide to finding scum is invalid, it might be outdated or not apply and you need to find a new way to do it.
Their is no one way to play mafia, and I wish people stop pretending their was.
Post
Post #764 (isolation #55) » Wed Nov 04, 2015 2:31 am
Postby Flubbernugget »
In post 758, Kraeg wrote:With regards to the Ocean wagon, I'm not entirely convinced. I think Titus is somehow tunneling people one by one, and I'm more inclined not to follow it just like how I didn't jump on the Blocky wagon which she started. And I think Ocean have refuted some of the accusations against him.
Post
Post #1009 (isolation #56) » Wed Nov 04, 2015 2:25 pm
Postby Flubbernugget »
In post 783, Persivul wrote:You could take BP if you thought you could find a cop with a massclaim, which you pushed for hard.
You're either vig or SK. Blatantly pointing out a cop crumb was anti-town. So you're stupid or you're SK, and we all know you're not stupid. That just leaves SK.