In post 59, DiamondSentinel wrote:I hate RVS, so I'm just warning you that I won't really say much, nor read much until tomorrow, when I expect RVS to be over.
This has been another playstyle note by DiamondSentinel!
Thanks for reading!
In post 25, Diego1487 wrote:He placed a vote and gave what looked like a reason for the vote in the same post. I wanted to know if the reason was sarcasm, and therefore RSV, or an actual reason that I was going to analyze.In post 23, Apricity wrote:VOTE: Diego
I don't get the point of his reaction test, nor why he picked itle in particular.
Random's entry post also confuses me.
In post 28, Diego1487 wrote:In post 27, Apricity wrote:In post 25, Diego1487 wrote:He placed a vote and gave what looked like a reason for the vote in the same post. I wanted to know if the reason was sarcasm, and therefore RSV, or an actual reason that I was going to analyze.
It was literally the 3rd post of the game. Did you really expect him to have a serious reason?
No that was why I would have had an issue with it had he said it was serious.
I never answered this...because I felt confident everyone else's post were RSV, I could not tell with his. I've seen people end RSV extremely early in games before, and I wanted to know if this was happening.In post 29, Apricity wrote:How was that different from other people's votes that also had "reasons"?
In post 77, Not_Mafia wrote:Got no notification game had started, catching up in a bit
In post 72, lilith2013 wrote:Fire has no way of scumreading me. If the hydra were voting me seriously this early, it would probably come from Vedith because I have played with him before. Also, from what I know, Fire and Vedith have similar playstyles (e.g, unserious/trolling). Therefore, I doubt Fire's vote on me was serious or had any reasonable basis. --> trolling
It had nothing to do with him not sharing reasons.
In post 81, Sharky5x wrote:I overuse wording like "make a case" srry
diego may have possibly just done something stupid rather than scumslipped or anything, would like to move on from it. so many people jumped on him its kinda odd
In post 83, The_Jester wrote:Sharky, do you think there's scum on Diego's wagon?
In post 84, DiamondSentinel wrote:If someone is at L-1 and gives me a decent reason for voting, then I will vote. Otherwise, I will not be voting anytime soon.
while I think he could equally be a misguided townie as weak scum, I can understand voting him, as the question was not useful in any way and could be contrived as scum wanting to appear like he's scumhunting. I do think scum on his wagon is a possibility, but I'm not going to bank on that just yetIn post 83, The_Jester wrote:Sharky, do you think there's scum on Diego's wagon?
why?! is the first day so pointless we shouldn't gather any information on it whatsoever?In post 84, DiamondSentinel wrote:If someone is at L-1 and gives me a decent reason for voting, then I will vote. Otherwise, I will not be voting anytime soon.
In post 89, The_Jester wrote:Haha Vedith sorry to disappoint you but I'm playing exclusively from phone lately and that just sucks major balls. We can get a lil' bit dirty in here if you want to, though.
As to your question: no.
@Sharky why don't you vote him then?
I checked the one other full game he played on this site. he was active, just took him hella long to vote anyone. I still disagree with his view and I want to see his response to my postIn post 89, The_Jester wrote:@Sharky why don't you vote him then?
In post 86, My Other Head Is Scum wrote:In post 72, lilith2013 wrote:Fire has no way of scumreading me. If the hydra were voting me seriously this early, it would probably come from Vedith because I have played with him before. Also, from what I know, Fire and Vedith have similar playstyles (e.g, unserious/trolling). Therefore, I doubt Fire's vote on me was serious or had any reasonable basis. --> trolling
It had nothing to do with him not sharing reasons.
You are completely wrong here. Neither of us troll, you just need to be a player who plays here often to know that we try to make the game that little more enjoyable.
Also, if anything, FB is most likely the serious head.
Concerning FB scum reading you, of course he can believe that you are scum, it might be wrong, or even right but he can suspect anyone as higher scum right now.
-Vedith
In post 93, The_Jester wrote:Well since I'm town, I think we should lynch Apricity.
@Apricity, are you scum? Just admit it, you'll feel all fresh and relieved after all.
In post 94, lilith2013 wrote:In my view, trolling = not serious. Not necessarily a bad thing. I do think you both are not always serious and use a lot of sarcasm, which is trolling to me. In terms of being able to scumread me, I seriously doubt Fire would be able to say right off the bat, while I was obviously RVSing, whether I was scum. Because we haven't played together before.
Who on Diego's wagon do you think is scum?
In post 72, lilith2013 wrote:Also, from what I know, Fire and Vedith have similar playstyles
In post 94, lilith2013 wrote:I seriously doubt Fire would be able to say right off the bat, while I was obviously RVSing, whether I was scum. Because we haven't played together before.