Mini 496 - Wild West Mafia. Mod Abandoned

curiouskarmadog · Post Post #150 (ISO) » Sun Sep 09, 2007 6:33 am

GodOfWine wrote:
curiouskarmadog wrote:hmm, well there is three votes on pdcakes,
Adam's contradiction,
the fact we are on page 6 and still in the random vote stage...
Is this just him saying that the note is false, or did he contradict himself somewhere and I missed it?

check out my post 126, adam has since commented on it..my point was however, I have played with ryan before when his playstyle would have jumped all over this comment...I was wondering why ryan is not rooting out scum now.

pdcakes · Post Post #151 (ISO) » Sun Sep 09, 2007 6:44 am

wait i have three votes?

hey would it be possible to get a vote count.

curiouskarmadog · Post Post #152 (ISO) » Sun Sep 09, 2007 6:48 am

pdcakes wrote:wait i have three votes?

hey would it be possible to get a vote count.

actually the vote count has not been updated since Para removed his vote...

I stand correct, you just have two

curiouskarmadog · Post Post #153 (ISO) » Sun Sep 09, 2007 6:59 am

I stand "corrected", damn proof reading...

Adele · Post Post #154 (ISO) » Sun Sep 09, 2007 8:24 am

ryan wrote:I haven't seen anything that I can jump on yet.

That's jump-worthy. You can't wait for stuff to happen, you have to help make it happen! Why, when I was a bit younger, I challenged a player to an accusation-off just to get things going because there really

was

nothing going on. If you're gonna lurk, lurk, but don't pretend it's because this game's a swamp of nothingness, because it patently ain't.

ryan · Post Post #155 (ISO) » Sun Sep 09, 2007 11:24 am

I'm not lurking. I haven't seen a subject that I feel strongly about to comment on. I believe the note on Adam is worthy of discussion but since we have 50% of the people on both sides of the fence with it, I'm comfortable looking for other possible lynches here in Day 1. You can rip me for not steering conversation but saying I'm lurking is completely stupid. I didn't realize that I was voted the leader of the town. I'll try and keep up my end than.

GodOfWine · Post Post #156 (ISO) » Sun Sep 09, 2007 1:32 pm

I remember now curiouskarmadog. About that whole contradiction thing, I can't really make up my mind. This may not be what he was trying to say, but what i got out of the whole pdcakes being cautious was because he held on to an idea about lynching Adam without ever actually voting for him. That's what I think Adam was calling cautious. But he must only be selectively cautious because holding on to an idea that everyone else has abandoned woul definitely draw attention to yourself - the exact thing a cautious mafioso would avoid. I think both pdcakes is guilty of having contradictory behaviour, and Adam is guilty of reading selectively, and making statements that aren't thorough.

Aimee · Post Post #157 (ISO) » Sun Sep 09, 2007 10:41 pm

ryan wrote:I'm not lurking. I haven't seen a subject that I feel strongly about to comment on. I believe the note on Adam is worthy of discussion but since we have 50% of the people on both sides of the fence with it, I'm comfortable looking for other possible lynches here in Day 1. You can rip me for not steering conversation but saying I'm lurking is completely stupid. I didn't realize that I was voted the leader of the town. I'll try and keep up my end than.

When did anyone say you had to steer conversation? CKD and others were quite clearly asking you to

contribute

to things. Who do you think is suspicious? Who don't you think is suspicious? etc. No one ever said you had to lead the town - not quite sure where you got that from.

ryan · Post Post #158 (ISO) » Mon Sep 10, 2007 1:07 am

I'm sorry Aimee, how have you contributed again?

theopor_COD · Post Post #159 (ISO) » Mon Sep 10, 2007 1:08 am

Prods have been sent.

curiouskarmadog · Post Post #160 (ISO) » Mon Sep 10, 2007 1:44 am

ryan wrote:I'm sorry Aimee, how have you contributed again?

she could be contributing now with this question...

I have seen you lead the town before (and I remember you being l misynched day 2)....I was just wondering why you werent doing it again this game....

ryan · Post Post #161 (ISO) » Mon Sep 10, 2007 1:51 am

curiouskarmadog wrote:
ryan wrote:I'm sorry Aimee, how have you contributed again?
she could be contributing now with this question...

I have seen you lead the town before (
and I remember you being l misynched day 2
)....I was just wondering why you werent doing it again this game....

Exactly the reasons I've bolded. Also to be honest I haven't been able to read a few players who this is the first time I've played with. Ah, I believe my vote is still a random one so

unvote

I'll have a few other tid bits later on today.

curiouskarmadog · Post Post #162 (ISO) » Mon Sep 10, 2007 1:55 am

ryan wrote:
curiouskarmadog wrote:
ryan wrote:I'm sorry Aimee, how have you contributed again?
she could be contributing now with this question...

I have seen you lead the town before (
and I remember you being l misynched day 2
)....I was just wondering why you werent doing it again this game....
Exactly the reasons I've bolded. Also to be honest I haven't been able to read a few players who this is the first time I've played with. Ah, I believe my vote is still a random one so

unvote

I'll have a few other tid bits later on today.

I figured that was the reason...or a reason anyway. But we do not know the outcome of that game...your contribution still could have helped and it could still be considered a win for you.

pdcakes · Post Post #163 (ISO) » Mon Sep 10, 2007 3:23 am

my random vote appears to still be on...... so

Unvote:Paradoxombie

kabenon007 · Post Post #164 (ISO) » Mon Sep 10, 2007 5:04 am

okay, I have completed my re-read and have come to agree with something said early on about the note. It could have been an SK. I've never played with an SK, but I believe they want both sides dead, right? And each night they get a kill, right? So maybe in this mini, they can also write on the wall, getting the town to lynch someone so the SK basically gets two kills? Just an idea.

And I am going to

vote pdcakes

. I didn't like the way pdcakes switched his perspective on adam so quickly, and I know we've been over this before, but it just stuck out in my mind, and at the moment you are the most scummy person on my list. It was like you saw people weren't attacking him, so you decided to stop too. And you OMGUS'd Twomz, which to me says that you were just getting a little overzealous in your defense and lashed back.

ryan · Post Post #165 (ISO) » Mon Sep 10, 2007 5:32 am

Aimee wrote:
ryan wrote:I'm not lurking. I haven't seen a subject that I feel strongly about to comment on. I believe the note on Adam is worthy of discussion but since we have 50% of the people on both sides of the fence with it, I'm comfortable looking for other possible lynches here in Day 1. You can rip me for not steering conversation but saying I'm lurking is completely stupid. I didn't realize that I was voted the leader of the town. I'll try and keep up my end than.
When did anyone say you had to steer conversation? CKD and others were quite clearly asking you to
contribute
to things. Who do you think is suspicious? Who don't you think is suspicious? etc. No one ever said you had to lead the town - not quite sure where you got that from.

Most Suspicious
pdcakes
Adam the Amazing
Aimee

Least Suspicious
Adele
GodofWine
kabenon007

pdcakes · Post Post #166 (ISO) » Mon Sep 10, 2007 5:40 am

kabenon007 wrote: And I am going to
vote pdcakes
. I didn't like the way pdcakes switched his perspective on adam so quickly, and I know we've been over this before, but it just stuck out in my mind, and at the moment you are the most scummy person on my list. It was like you saw people weren't attacking him, so you decided to stop too. And you OMGUS'd Twomz, which to me says that you were just getting a little overzealous in your defense and lashed back.

Kabe: what did you mean by"it was like you saw people who weren't attacking him so you stopped too"? Im pretty sure ive been accused of attacking him and pushing my stance on him long after people gave it a rest. But if you are talking about the difference between posts 2 and 4 then as i said before i chalk that one up to just bad thought to post transition.

and i wasnt trying for it to be an OMGUS on twomz. i mean i didnt even vote for him. I was just intrigued by the way he skewed my posts and left out a lot of my posts that actually explained some of my actions that he highlighted as scum.

Battle Mage · Post Post #167 (ISO) » Mon Sep 10, 2007 5:47 am

Back-Up Mod Vote-Count

pdcakes 3 - GodofWine, Twomz, Kabenon
ryan 1 - Adele
Kabenon 1 - Aimee
Sir Wario 1 - Thin_Man
Curiouskarmadog 1 - Sir Wario

Not voting 5 - AdamtheAmazing, Curiouskarmadog, Paradoxombie, Ryan, Pdcakes

kabenon007 · Post Post #168 (ISO) » Mon Sep 10, 2007 6:16 am

I know we have gone over this before. I'm not condemning you as scum so much as voicing my opinion in an effort to avoid a deadline and to stir up some conversation. You are just at the top of my scum list. And yes it was in reference to your 2nd and 4th posts. You were like let's put the note aside, let's test to see if it's true. It was just very circumstantial answers. That's all.

And nobody tries to OMGUS someone except in the random voting stage. It is something that is just picked up on, or at least something I picked up on.

curiouskarmadog · Post Post #169 (ISO) » Mon Sep 10, 2007 6:48 am

vote thin man

pressure vote mostly...his last post was rather snarky and was 7 days ago.

your thoughts on the current game?

Aimee · Post Post #170 (ISO) » Mon Sep 10, 2007 9:23 am

I'll definitely have more content up by tomorrow.

ryan wrote:Most Suspicious
pdcakes
Adam the Amazing
Aimee

Least Suspicious
Adele
GodofWine
kabenon007

Reasons?

theopor_COD · Post Post #171 (ISO) » Mon Sep 10, 2007 11:42 am

Cheers BM. Much appreciated.

Thin_Man was one of those prodded, he's yet to pick his PM up. Giving him 48 hours to do so.

GodOfWine · Post Post #172 (ISO) » Mon Sep 10, 2007 3:26 pm

Just letting everyone know I'm here and up to date. Don't have time to post tonight, definitely tomorrow (tuesday). Happy hunting!

Twomz · Post Post #173 (ISO) » Mon Sep 10, 2007 6:27 pm

I too am here. I suppose our best option would be to have everyone check in and do a top scum choices (with reasons) posting session? If it is not useful now, it may be useful in the endgame.

Just a suggestion.

Adele · Post Post #174 (ISO) » Tue Sep 11, 2007 6:18 am

Twomz wrote:I too am here. I suppose our best option would be to have everyone check in and do a top scum choices (with reasons) posting session? If it is not useful now, it may be useful in the endgame.

It also seems like a helpful thing to do for the scum; they can figure out who suspects them against who has influence and build a (sufficiently wifomy, obv) strategy from there...