In post 1573, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Interestingly, Ricastle has the exact same reaction as The Silver Bard-scum in the game Titus and I just completed (Warcraft Mafia).
In post 1022, The Silver Bard wrote:I love how none of you who have voted me, or who have said they think I might be scum have mentioned any reasons. Closest thing to a reason is Vedith having a gutfeeling.
In post 715, Titus wrote:In post 96, Ricastle wrote:Because experiencing my presence first-hand is one of the most crucial elements to the early game. It's like praying to God, except if he did it for you.In post 67, Fro99er wrote:- Ricastle...what? Why did you bother to check in to say you have no idea, oh wait yes you do, but you're not gonna make anything of it? What's the point in checking in if you're not even going to post anything worthwhile?
Now, onto business.
VOTE: Bulbazak
Drixx is definitely scum, yet you've given no regard toward him since your opening statement. Also, that's way more townreads than I'm comfortable seeing from a player at this stage of the game. Seems like you're just spurting shit for the sake of getting solid reads as soon as possible.
In post 141, Ricastle wrote:Well, my counterargument to this should be short.In post 124, Marquis wrote:ric that's mean.if you're town i'll tell you right now that you should try to avoid what went on in my last double day mini for both of our sakes
i also realize i didn't address bulba being town -
i don't see the contradictions between his read strengths and votes as some sort of contrived scum disconnect, but rather fluctuation as he's going on thinking/posting. experienced scum posts and read positions are carefully crafted, including the strength of those commitments, and no matter how tired he is a scum!bulba's not some random novice at it.
basically: one, i find it hard to believe a scum!bulba would leave that open for attack with the naked vote change. and two, his responses to posts directed at him were more easy and natural than not. he's speaking, not crafting. call his mario vote change bad in theory, but it's a town direct response to vote my townread there and not care about the consequences.
I don't have one.
VOTE: Drixx
Not feeling Anatole honestly. I can imagine town me starting off in a similar fashion, and I think his point is decent although I do disagree with his conclusion. I'd rather use my vote to make the above guy do something rn.
Pedit: You're going to have to explain that one, Titus.
In post 622, Ricastle wrote:I didn't like that response when I first read it, but that ^ made up my mind.
VOTE: Porochaz
Wow, Mr. Consensus is here. Got any unique thoughts?
Totally down for wagoning this.
In post 1572, Glork wrote:Titus 3 (Katsuki, Porochaz, Gorkington)
Anatole Kuragin 1 (Ranger)
MarioManiac4 1 (Dongempire)
Dongempire 1 (PeregrineV)
In post 1571, Gorkington wrote:him disappearing now isnt bugging you?frogguy wrote:I will fight to the death Anatole
because its starting to bug me.
and tammy saying that ana's more recent scumgames are less wooden is making me feel a lot less great.
In post 1584, Porochaz wrote:Im not exactly sure why you are all following ABR, who has done nothing all day and suddenly decided this is a good lynch and you all follow.
In post 1584, Porochaz wrote:Yeah... Im not exactly sure why you are all following ABR, who has done nothing all day and suddenly decided this is a good lynch and you all follow. Im seen him do this before which is infuriating, and whats more I've seen him be wrong more than he is right. Why are people not voting Titus or Anatole or Katsuki to name a few?
In post 1585, Titus wrote:ABR, while we wait, let's try to get a block going. I would like it if you used Tammy to her fullest potential. While we disagree with the Drixx rationale atm, I would like you to realize that she provides enormous potential with both types of scumhunting. I am pretty sure you both are town. I would like to PoE this. That's what was right with my play in Warcraft (had both scums as null).
In post 1588, Titus wrote:In post 1584, Porochaz wrote:Yeah... Im not exactly sure why you are all following ABR, who has done nothing all day and suddenly decided this is a good lynch and you all follow. Im seen him do this before which is infuriating, and whats more I've seen him be wrong more than he is right. Why are people not voting Titus or Anatole or Katsuki to name a few?
Hi. You Ricastle's buddy? ABR's obvtown. Taking charge to lead a wagon after a VLA is very pro town. The only way I think ABR could be scum ATM is scum with Drixx and I don't see that.
In post 1588, Titus wrote:You Ricastle's buddy?
LMAOIn post 1579, Titus wrote:In post 715, Titus wrote:In post 96, Ricastle wrote:Because experiencing my presence first-hand is one of the most crucial elements to the early game. It's like praying to God, except if he did it for you.In post 67, Fro99er wrote:- Ricastle...what? Why did you bother to check in to say you have no idea, oh wait yes you do, but you're not gonna make anything of it? What's the point in checking in if you're not even going to post anything worthwhile?
Now, onto business.
VOTE: Bulbazak
Drixx is definitely scum, yet you've given no regard toward him since your opening statement. Also, that's way more townreads than I'm comfortable seeing from a player at this stage of the game. Seems like you're just spurting shit for the sake of getting solid reads as soon as possible.
In post 141, Ricastle wrote:Well, my counterargument to this should be short.In post 124, Marquis wrote:ric that's mean.
i also realize i didn't address bulba being town -
i don't see the contradictions between his read strengths and votes as some sort of contrived scum disconnect, but rather fluctuation as he's going on thinking/posting. experienced scum posts and read positions are carefully crafted, including the strength of those commitments, and no matter how tired he is a scum!bulba's not some random novice at it.
basically: one, i find it hard to believe a scum!bulba would leave that open for attack with the naked vote change. and two, his responses to posts directed at him were more easy and natural than not. he's speaking, not crafting. call his mario vote change bad in theory, but it's a town direct response to vote my townread there and not care about the consequences.
I don't have one.
VOTE: Drixx
Not feeling Anatole honestly. I can imagine town me starting off in a similar fashion, and I think his point is decent although I do disagree with his conclusion. I'd rather use my vote to make the above guy do something rn.
Pedit: You're going to have to explain that one, Titus.
In post 622, Ricastle wrote:I didn't like that response when I first read it, but that ^ made up my mind.
VOTE: Porochaz
Wow, Mr. Consensus is here. Got any unique thoughts?
Totally down for wagoning this.
Merry Christmas.
In post 1584, Porochaz wrote:Yeah... Im not exactly sure why you are all following ABR, who has done nothing all day and suddenly decided this is a good lynch and you all follow. Im seen him do this before which is infuriating, and whats moreI've seen him be wrong more than he is right. Why are people not voting Titus or Anatole or Katsuki to name a few?
