Mini 1738: Original Mafia (Day)

sun_danyun · Post Post #325 (ISO) » Mon Nov 23, 2015 10:36 am

Not sure if Sakura really is apathetic town, or if that's what they want us to think, to second guess lynching them. #306 They just went along with Aj, who most wants dead itlepip and Sakura, listening to a very small portion of his case against itlepip and ignores the rest of his post. Weakly opposed to being lynched in #257, giving a weak reason. So, either they just don't care, or they are scum who was trying to lay low and don't want to go off on people now, because that would be suspicious. It'd be interesting to see what Sakura flips, but it's possible that they're just an easy target for scum (who'd probably be Aj, then) to convince to town is guilty.
Actually Aj, really could be scum. The way he defended RM earlier, it was like scolding him slightly for drawing attention to himself, also so it didn't look like he was totally covering for him. If RM flips scum, Aj could definitely be his partner. I want to read his recent posts in depth, but I feel I could only really interpret them when we see RM's flip. If Sakura is lynched, her reveal will be very useful as well.

At this point, we could just lynch Aj and see what he is. If he's town though, then we might have lost someone valuable for town. Or, Sakura could be lynched, and the two flips are used to try to determine Aj's alignment. Either one is fine, really.
So, I'll

Vote: Guilty

.

Lotus Miko · Post Post #326 (ISO) » Mon Nov 23, 2015 11:21 am

Nah, it's possible AJ really believes this is my scum meta, since he's never seen me be apathetic as town nor has ever seen me as scum, when in reality i get apathetic as both. Nacho on the other hand is more concerning to me. All in all if i'm just for info lynch I'm just gonna go ahead and let myself be lynched, so i at least am more useful in death than in life.

-Sakura

itlepip · Post Post #327 (ISO) » Mon Nov 23, 2015 11:33 am

VOTE: guilty

hiplop · Post Post #328 (ISO) » Mon Nov 23, 2015 12:02 pm

In post 327, itlepip wrote:VOTE: guilty

^ this is making me wish we got rid of this guy

explain?

itlepip · Post Post #329 (ISO) » Mon Nov 23, 2015 12:04 pm

In post 328, hiplop wrote:
In post 327, itlepip wrote:VOTE: guilty

^ this is making me wish we got rid of this guy

explain?

I'm not a fan of letting someone live after they say their death would benefit town. I still think that there is a chance of flipping scum here so I vote.

hiplop · Post Post #330 (ISO) » Mon Nov 23, 2015 12:27 pm

fair enough.

Aj The Epic · Post Post #331 (ISO) » Mon Nov 23, 2015 12:48 pm

So why don't both Hiplop and itlepip follow that idea and stop being someone who would benefit the town (especially Hip)

itlepip · Post Post #332 (ISO) » Mon Nov 23, 2015 1:23 pm

In post 331, Aj The Epic wrote:So why don't both Hiplop and itlepip follow that idea and stop being someone who would benefit the town (especially Hip)

What would either my or hip's death prove?

Hippy Love · Post Post #333 (ISO) » Mon Nov 23, 2015 1:28 pm

excuse me?

Lotus Miko · Post Post #334 (ISO) » Mon Nov 23, 2015 1:58 pm

In post 331, Aj The Epic wrote:So why don't both Hiplop and itlepip follow that idea and stop being someone who would benefit the town (especially Hip)

Uh, what, why would someone stop being someone that would benefit the town?

-Sakura

Slaughterhouse Five · Post Post #335 (ISO) » Mon Nov 23, 2015 3:13 pm

Last post was mine and mine alone. Haven't talked with Nacho outside the game at all.

LQ

Slaughterhouse Five · Post Post #336 (ISO) » Mon Nov 23, 2015 3:18 pm

(Which can change any time!)

Buckwild · Post Post #337 (ISO) » Mon Nov 23, 2015 5:41 pm

Weighing in. I am on vacation but with decent internet access, so I won't take a v/la.

I don't like Sakura's responses to the accuse at all. I am on the fence over if she is disinterested town or lay lowing scum. Or a third option, disinterested scum? Even if she turns out town, I don't think we'll be losing much. I feel like a lurking town player can cause unnecessary confusion in a game like this with no power roles.

Buckwild · Post Post #338 (ISO) » Mon Nov 23, 2015 5:42 pm

o yea,

vote: Guilty

Jingle · Post Post #339 (ISO) » Mon Nov 23, 2015 6:41 pm

I'm back, and have vaguely read. I'll have more substantial posting tomorrow, but

VOTE: Not Guilty

This hyperactive accusation bit is decidedly antitown.

hiplop · Post Post #340 (ISO) » Mon Nov 23, 2015 7:04 pm

VOTE: guilty

we need a flip

HOW IS EVERYONE IN THIS GAME VLA???????

Lotus Miko · Post Post #341 (ISO) » Mon Nov 23, 2015 7:36 pm

In post 340, hiplop wrote:we need a flip

If you wanted a flip you'd have voted for night, not for us, there's a pending flip you know.

-Sakura

IceGuy · Post Post #342 (ISO) » Mon Nov 23, 2015 8:14 pm

In post 339, Jingle wrote:
This hyperactive accusation bit is decidedly antitown.

Good to know you're providing other activity then!

Aj The Epic · Post Post #343 (ISO) » Tue Nov 24, 2015 3:06 am

Yeah that 3 day long inactivity makes me think town all the way.

Lotus Miko · Post Post #344 (ISO) » Tue Nov 24, 2015 3:42 am

Nah, Jingle's town for not hoping into the Activity/Content = Town or otherwise Scum bandwagon.

-Sakura

Scorpious · Post Post #345 (ISO) » Tue Nov 24, 2015 4:09 am

In post 340, hiplop wrote:VOTE: guilty

we need a flip

HOW IS EVERYONE IN THIS GAME VLA???????

I agree with this.. I've been moving/working.. The "V" in V/LA does not apply to me.

VOTE: guilty

Makoto Nanaya · Post Post #346 (ISO) » Tue Nov 24, 2015 4:21 am

In post 306, Lotus Miko wrote:
In post 305, Aj The Epic wrote:constant misrep from Itle

He's misrepping?
Ok
VOTE: Lynch

-Sakura

I find it strange the case on sakura is about inactivity when we have this strange behavior. She was basically against the Lynch until this from how I read it. Why did you do this, sakuya?

Lotus Miko · Post Post #347 (ISO) » Tue Nov 24, 2015 4:41 am

In post 346, Makoto Nanaya wrote:we have this strange behavior

What strange behaviour?

In post 346, Makoto Nanaya wrote:She was basically against the Lynch

I was?

In post 346, Makoto Nanaya wrote:Why did you do this, sakuya?

2 reasons, misrepping is something i consider scummy, also i have a no-busing scum-meta so I wanted to get reactions from ppl like Nacho since he jumped into the wagon after AJ asked.

-Sakura

Lotus Miko · Post Post #348 (ISO) » Tue Nov 24, 2015 4:46 am

Also now that i think about it, both hiplop and Jingle know my scum meta, so hiplop is now suspicious because he knows i don't just lurk the day out as scum. Coupled with posts like 307 and 340 where he's just voting "because we need flips" which if that's what he thought he'd be pushing for Night more so we get randommidget's flip. Considering he believes he's scum on 237 and so certain of it, then why's he looking for more flips by lynching more ppl?

-Sakura

Aj The Epic · Post Post #349 (ISO) » Tue Nov 24, 2015 5:02 am

In post 346, Makoto Nanaya wrote:
In post 306, Lotus Miko wrote:
In post 305, Aj The Epic wrote:constant misrep from Itle

He's misrepping?
Ok
VOTE: Lynch

-Sakura

I find it strange the case on sakura is about inactivity when we have this strange behavior. She was basically against the Lynch until this from how I read it. Why did you do this, sakuya?

It's not inactivity that's driving my belief. It's her inability to produce town reads or function like her town self.

In post 259, Aj The Epic wrote:
In post 256, Lotus Miko wrote:I've been thinking about it and reads list give scum a road map of who to shoot, so no.

-Sakura

Oh Jesus that's so garbage. A.) You generally have 4-5 town. B) scum already knows the general feeling of who people correctly assume as town and C.) It's more unlikely in this game to get a nightkill than in a normal game!

This excuse is weak and a complete non-answer to your play.