In post 823, Ythan wrote:I thought I had played with players who ought to have been banned before but never anything like ranger.
What's wrong with what Ranger has done?
(Bear in mind, that I never did catch up, only very very briefly skimmed)
You would be caught up if this shit wasn't in the game.
So because she's posted an insane number of times, she should be banned?
Because her trivial bullshit within the post count for the purpose of pimping her very likely Jester Wincon, while pretty much derailing the game momentarily in full.
In post 823, Ythan wrote:I thought I had played with players who ought to have been banned before but never anything like ranger.
What's wrong with what Ranger has done?
(Bear in mind, that I never did catch up, only very very briefly skimmed)
You would be caught up if this shit wasn't in the game.
So because she's posted an insane number of times, she should be banned?
Because her trivial bullshit within the post count for the purpose of pimping her very likely Jester Wincon, while pretty much derailing the game momentarily in full.
In post 835, TheLhix wrote:Because her trivial bullshit within the post count for the purpose of pimping her very likely Jester Wincon, while pretty much derailing the game momentarily in full.
But if she's a Jester, and trying to be obnoxious so that people would lynch her, then that is just playing to her win condition. Seems like a silly thing to get mad at someone about.
In post 835, TheLhix wrote:Because her trivial bullshit within the post count for the purpose of pimping her very likely Jester Wincon, while pretty much derailing the game momentarily in full.
But if she's a Jester, and trying to be obnoxious so that people would lynch her, then that is just playing to her win condition. Seems like a silly thing to get mad at someone about.
Hence why we slaughter Lane and we reveal everything we can at night. We got them cornered
In post 835, TheLhix wrote:Because her trivial bullshit within the post count for the purpose of pimping her very likely Jester Wincon, while pretty much derailing the game momentarily in full.
But if she's a Jester, and trying to be obnoxious so that people would lynch her, then that is just playing to her win condition. Seems like a silly thing to get mad at someone about.
Hence why we slaughter Lane and we reveal everything we can at night. We got them cornered
Fair enough. I'm down for lynching Lane. It just seems odd to be legitimately upset with Ranger for her posts.
In post 835, TheLhix wrote:Because her trivial bullshit within the post count for the purpose of pimping her very likely Jester Wincon, while pretty much derailing the game momentarily in full.
But if she's a Jester, and trying to be obnoxious so that people would lynch her, then that is just playing to her win condition. Seems like a silly thing to get mad at someone about.
Hence why we slaughter Lane and we reveal everything we can at night. We got them cornered
Fair enough. I'm down for lynching Lane. It just seems odd to be legitimately upset with Ranger for her posts.
Well, as far as anger goes, I am just down with saying its annoying and derailing. I understand its a lawless game, but I feel they went very far with it and just made it tedious.
As far a game objective though, this is the first really comprehensive thing we have gotten.
I'm not mad at ranger, im just lynching someone else and spoiler rangers idea of fun since she flooded the game with nonsense.
I also figure it's not against anyone's win con to lynch someone else
Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.
Never got the chance to read through the game with the thanksgiving weekend but amnesiac isn't the worst lynch. And considering there's only 4 hours. I'll see you all in the afterlife. I apologize I was busy this Thanksgiving
