Blood.
Here is a read from me, my lynch is probably inevitable. I just ask to wait for second lynch as test it, unless you have some ulterior motive as to not testing that out if you must lynch me.
In post 141, BL0ODK1NG wrote:I say is he knows if he is town or not and voting on a confirmed town is always bad so for him to vote on himself as town always hurts town especially in a no flip game cause we won't even get the info after his death. All it does is kill off a town easier. So thelhix you voting for yourself as town shouldn't be done and by doing it your telling me you are scum if I am wrong and you are town you should force more people to vote for you that don't include yourself. In fact it's actually withholding info from town by voting on you self so I will ask you if you are town to remove you self vote.
You've tunneled me since the damn near beginning, as well as ignoring any of my posts or reasoning and merely stating ethos as your prime argument. With your twist and tunneling, you also just asked me to do two things at once, to confirm your predetermined ethos in the form of logos. (Ethos: Argument by ethics, Logos: argument by logic)
In post 79, BL0ODK1NG wrote:Okay, well the one thing I've seen this game that I don't like is thelhix my vote is serious on it. I don't like their following of FB onto MM and this makes me think MM is town
Not only did you ignore my reasoning for going onto that wagon, but you threw in your original meanings as a ethical argument. With no substantial reasoning between our connection. I say ethical as you entirely ignored my post on the logical reasonings of getting rid of MM. (Which, btw, inane voting, trolling and being useless are pretty valid reasons to at least pressure someone further, especially in a game like this)
In post 22, BL0ODK1NG wrote:VOTE: thelhix - because you seem like
your left out, talking to yourself in the corner raising your hand.
Your vote hasn't changed since the RVS stage pretty much
In post 47, BL0ODK1NG wrote:In post 43, TheLhix wrote:
Vote: bloodking
Is this a serious vote, with a reason behind it? Or...
You demanded reasoning on a RVS vote, traded with your original one, which you never changed based on nothing but ethical claims.
In post 131, BL0ODK1NG wrote:I think the next two lynches to have a good chance getting one is thelhix and MM
Since we don't see flips it's going to be harder to try and lynch someone who could be said persons partner as we won't know if they were scum in the first place. So I think, even though it's the longer way I feel hedging lynches is the safer way to go to ensure we don't get completely sidetracked by incorrect scum reads.
In post 134, BL0ODK1NG wrote:Order doesn't matter if that's what we want to do but I would rather lynch you first solely because I feel there is one on the two wagons that isn't one of the two lynchees of the wagons it doesn't mean I don't think MM or Ranger could be scum but like I said scum have to be actively keeping the higher vote count on a town so I think that a the higher the wagon this early without a competing one that's equal makes me think the larger wagon has scum on it. Like I said FB is also a good option.
You seem to be flip flopping alot on who should die after me, and you are very insistent that you don't meet my challenge of being the second lynch if you must lynch me. Which I openly said would be because of the constant scrutiny against me for the rest of the game. If what logic you used remained consistent on who you wanted to lynch it wouldnt really matter that I was second if you got the traction for it.
Pedit: Fixed the stupid shit