Blitz 7: Hardcore Mafia III (Game Over)

Extrapolated Eagle · Post Post #225 (ISO) » Wed Dec 02, 2015 9:20 am

In post 224, MarioManiac4 wrote:VOTE: Eagle
I've given up on this game because apparently Ranger+friends have magically solved the game and are attempting to lynch town.
The most frustrating thing is that after I die Ranger is going to keep bragging "she caught skuhm!!11"

All due respect, sir, but when did you give this game a chance? I haven't seen you really try at all.

MarioManiac4 · Post Post #226 (ISO) » Wed Dec 02, 2015 9:48 am

In post 225, Extrapolated Eagle wrote:
In post 224, MarioManiac4 wrote:VOTE: Eagle
I've given up on this game because apparently Ranger+friends have magically solved the game and are attempting to lynch town.
The most frustrating thing is that after I die Ranger is going to keep bragging "she caught skuhm!!11"

All due respect, sir, but when did you give this game a chance? I haven't seen you really try at all.

Trying to figure out things in the spite of there being nothing really alignment indicative, only to be told that I'm scum because I don't understand something. I gave up at that point.

Extrapolated Eagle · Post Post #227 (ISO) » Wed Dec 02, 2015 9:55 am

UNVOTE:
Alright gimme some reads, Mario. How do you feel about EP?

MarioManiac4 · Post Post #228 (ISO) » Wed Dec 02, 2015 10:00 am

Errant might actually be town. Thinks for themself.

Extrapolated Eagle · Post Post #229 (ISO) » Wed Dec 02, 2015 10:07 am

In post 228, MarioManiac4 wrote:Errant might
actually
be town. Thinks for themself.

doea this mean you think a majority of players dont look town?

ika · Post Post #230 (ISO) » Wed Dec 02, 2015 10:26 am

Sigh.....

Extrapolated Eagle · Post Post #231 (ISO) » Wed Dec 02, 2015 10:33 am

In post 230, ika wrote:Sigh.....

Wut.

GuyInFreezer · Post Post #232 (ISO) » Wed Dec 02, 2015 10:33 am

MarioManiac4 - Ranger
Extrapolated Eagle - MarioManiac4
Errantparabola - Firebringer

Not Voting - ika, hi im yakko, Chaotic Neutrality, Extrapolated Eagle, Errantparabola

The deadline is in (expired on 2015-12-03 18:17:12).

ika · Post Post #233 (ISO) » Wed Dec 02, 2015 10:36 am

Marcos prob town after the extange

Errantparabola · Post Post #234 (ISO) » Wed Dec 02, 2015 10:55 am

Give me three hours and i will be home to do a full reread of the game. Shouldnt take too long considering it is only 10 pages long.

Extrapolated Eagle · Post Post #235 (ISO) » Wed Dec 02, 2015 11:38 am

So as I understand it, scum don't have a night kill. And since indecision results in no lynch, so if we need more time we can always not lynch anyone.

Oh yeah. And if we're certain this is a bastard mod, we could out-bastard the mod and just never lynch anyone.

Just some thoughts I had.

ika · Post Post #236 (ISO) » Wed Dec 02, 2015 11:44 am

Well eagle didn't read setup so I'm gonna chalk that as town, good we are done

ika · Post Post #237 (ISO) » Wed Dec 02, 2015 11:44 am

Well eagle didn't read setup so I'm gonna chalk that as town, good we are done

ika · Post Post #238 (ISO) » Wed Dec 02, 2015 11:45 am

VOTE: errant

Extrapolated Eagle · Post Post #239 (ISO) » Wed Dec 02, 2015 11:55 am

In post 233, ika wrote:Marcos prob town after the extange

That's what I have gathered as well.

In post 236, ika wrote:Well eagle didn't read setup so I'm gonna chalk that as town, good we are done

What did I miss?

Chaotic Neutrality · Post Post #240 (ISO) » Wed Dec 02, 2015 1:12 pm

No lynching extends the deadline and iirc you can only do it once before rocks fall on everyone and we all die.

Extrapolated Eagle · Post Post #241 (ISO) » Wed Dec 02, 2015 1:33 pm

In post 240, Chaotic Neutrality wrote:No lynching extends the deadline and iirc you can only do it once before rocks fall on everyone and we all die.

Would he really kill us all, though? Don't they have to have a champion?

Chaotic Neutrality · Post Post #242 (ISO) » Wed Dec 02, 2015 1:38 pm

No lynching repeatedly in a game with no kills results in a tie. I'd prefer scum dead but maybe that's just me.

Extrapolated Eagle · Post Post #243 (ISO) » Wed Dec 02, 2015 1:51 pm

In post 242, Chaotic Neutrality wrote:No lynching repeatedly in a game with no kills results in a tie. I'd prefer scum dead but maybe that's just me.

But if he kills us all because we refuse to vote..

Oh well never mind. Sorry.

I'll get back to playing the game, I just thought the rules were funny.

Errantparabola · Post Post #244 (ISO) » Wed Dec 02, 2015 2:32 pm

In post 72, TheLhix wrote:
In post 70, Errantparabola wrote:
In post 48, Ranger wrote:Rather the opposite, I've liked everything Thelhix has done.

"I've liked everything Thelhix has done"

I quoted that twice in two different ways because that's how shocked I am

I've bumblefucked around not know what to do trying to find a way to assimilate myself into something substantial. What could be liked about my shit

I do not think this is a very town post.

Ranger's 83 seems towny enough.

In post 90, MarioManiac4 wrote:
In post 89, Firebringer wrote:
In post 88, MarioManiac4 wrote:This sounds legitimate.
My vote is still on Ranger.

No counter to my arguments?
Why is ranger scum?

I do not have any counter.
Your arguments are too legitimate.

This seems pretty town. Since there is some pressure on Mario at this point it's possible that a scummario would be hesitant to say something that outright admits to doing bad work in the past
I'm glad we dodged a mario lynch d1.

In post 116, Ranger wrote:In this game, it might as well be.

I don't know about this logic, ranger.

Page 6 and upwards coming soon.

Errantparabola · Post Post #245 (ISO) » Wed Dec 02, 2015 2:40 pm

At the top of page 7 and I don't think I want to lynch Lhix.

In post 182, Chaotic Neutrality wrote:This is a scum post. You have permission to die after FB.

I don't like this.

I don't like that I have to rely so heavily on gut this game, but it might be a good test to see how good it is.

In post 197, Ranger wrote:
Firebringer wrote:VOTE: Errantparabola
This person isn't scumhunting at all.
I've seen Errant not scumhunt.

I'm pretty sure this is Errant scumhunting.

Honestly I agree with firebringer. I don't think anyone is seriously scumhunting as of this post though.

205 by eagle does not resonate well with me.
Also I think I did explain why. It was bad logic on a person that was already under pressure.

In post 207, Extrapolated Eagle wrote:Like question the wagon on Mario. Since I have scum read on Mario this is suspcious.

You've gotta be joking, mate. "You don't agree with my reads so you are suspicious?" That doesn't looks like good scumhunting to me

In post 219, Firebringer wrote:
In post 205, Extrapolated Eagle wrote:If fb isn't scum, and blood wasn't scum (which maybe we should assume if ranger is right) Poe says mm and ep are scum to me.

Okay....you have your vote on none of these people tho.
I like your entrance so far Extrapolated Eagle.

I don't (and by Eagles logic that makes you suspicious as a result.)

Errantparabola · Post Post #246 (ISO) » Wed Dec 02, 2015 2:48 pm

a quick rundown
A substantial amount of it is gut but I'm making do with what I have.

1) ranger - strongest townread
2) Chaotic Neutrality - null-scum but not lynchworthy
3) Errantparabola
4) hi I'm yakko - town
5) eagle - i might be able to lynch this
6) BL0ODK1NG - Dead, assume the worst and say town
7) mariomaniac4 - weak town read
8) ika - might be able to lynch this
9) firebringer - might be able to lynch this

ISOing the lynchworthy people now. I see firebringer's wagon with some support so I might be able to get on that

Errantparabola · Post Post #247 (ISO) » Wed Dec 02, 2015 2:49 pm

I'm extremely hesitant to call someone town for wanting to push activity into the game because I've seen scum do that before.
I'm also hesitant to call a lurker scum even in these circumstances.

Errantparabola · Post Post #248 (ISO) » Wed Dec 02, 2015 2:51 pm

In post 237, ika wrote:Well eagle didn't read setup so I'm gonna chalk that as town, good we are done

I don't see scum pointing this out.

VOTE: firebringer

Extrapolated Eagle · Post Post #249 (ISO) » Wed Dec 02, 2015 2:54 pm

In post 244, Errantparabola wrote:
In post 72, TheLhix wrote:
In post 70, Errantparabola wrote:
In post 48, Ranger wrote:Rather the opposite, I've liked everything Thelhix has done.

"I've liked everything Thelhix has done"

I quoted that twice in two different ways because that's how shocked I am

I've bumblefucked around not know what to do trying to find a way to assimilate myself into something substantial. What could be liked about my shit

I do not think this is a very town post.

ok so this needs more explanation.

In post 90, MarioManiac4 wrote:
In post 89, Firebringer wrote:
In post 88, MarioManiac4 wrote:This sounds legitimate.
My vote is still on Ranger.

No counter to my arguments?
Why is ranger scum?

I do not have any counter.
Your arguments are too legitimate.

This seems pretty town. Since there is some pressure on Mario at this point it's possible that a scummario would be hesitant to say something that outright admits to doing bad work in the past
I'm glad we dodged a mario lynch d1.

... Sarcasm = town? Wut.

Unless you're being sarcastic here. That would make more sense.

In post 116, Ranger wrote:In this game, it might as well be.

I don't know about this logic, ranger.

... Explain again pls.

In post 245, Errantparabola wrote:At the top of page 7 and I don't think I want to lynch Lhix.

In post 182, Chaotic Neutrality wrote:This is a scum post. You have permission to die after FB.

I don't like this.

I don't like that I have to rely so heavily on gut this game, but it might be a good test to see how good it is.

How? No flip. Also... Explain. Again. Sorry.

In post 197, Ranger wrote:
Firebringer wrote:VOTE: Errantparabola
This person isn't scumhunting at all.
I've seen Errant not scumhunt.

I'm pretty sure this is Errant scumhunting.

Honestly I agree with firebringer. I don't think anyone is seriously scumhunting as of this post though.

I don't like the things you say. Do you not make sense on purpose?

205 by eagle does not resonate well with me.
Also I think I did explain why. It was bad logic on a person that was already under pressure.

So... Mario is now a town read for me because of his reaction to my 205 and other things. He was useless/unreadable before. Explain pls, how this is bad. Also you say you don't trust your gut but you don't give reason for anything.

Also "doesn't resonate well with me" is gut.

In post 207, Extrapolated Eagle wrote:Like question the wagon on Mario. Since I have scum read on Mario this is suspcious.

You've gotta be joking, mate. "You don't agree with my reads so you are suspicious?" That doesn't looks like good scumhunting to me

u got stronger reads from somewhere, m8? U see people scumhunting places giving you strong reads mate? Nothin happen. I have to base reads off something. And since theres no reason behind reads, I have to go by reads themselves.

In post 219, Firebringer wrote:
In post 205, Extrapolated Eagle wrote:If fb isn't scum, and blood wasn't scum (which maybe we should assume if ranger is right) Poe says mm and ep are scum to me.

Okay....you have your vote on none of these people tho.
I like your entrance so far Extrapolated Eagle.

I don't (and by Eagles logic that makes you suspicious as a result.)

Wut m8.