Lady Lambdadelta (1): texcat
Spiffeh (2): Lady Lambdadelta, pirate mollie
Starbuck (5): Iecerint, Spiffeh, DrippingGoofball, Syryana, Ythan
Not Voting:
Deadline is Dec. 8th, 2pm PST
In post 202, Starbuck wrote:So why am I scum already?
In post 202, Starbuck wrote:As I said when I saw that post, I went to bed early. Way to completely misrepresent, Spiffeh.
In post 226, Iecerint wrote:Lord jesus the Starbuck wagon.
In post 233, Spiffeh wrote:In post 226, Iecerint wrote:Lord jesus the Starbuck wagon.
I really don't like this post especially when you're one of the people on the wagon.
Like if you think it's bad why not vote elsewhere or pick it apart?
In post 232, Spiffeh wrote:Seriously I've been making a conscious effort to NOT tunnel anyone this game
In post 241, Spifflop wrote:Why do you think Starbuck is scum?
In post 242, Spiffeh wrote:In post 241, Spifflop wrote:Why do you think Starbuck is scum?
Sorry that's me.
In post 202, Starbuck wrote:I'll give my two cents on Spiffeh. The straight out the gate thing that I'm automatically scum based on my RVS vote is bogus, as is DGB's. I figured it was a joke, but I replied to both anyways. It's pretty weird that Ythan had to hop in there and say "why would you acknowledge a joke?" when that's followed up by Spiffeh saying that he already thinks that I'm scummy after two posts in the game. I've ended up in a lot of games with Spiffeh since I came back. A few that have ended and a few ongoing still, but I don't think he's known me long enough to get a read off of two posts with one containing an RVS vote. So why am I scum already?
Then as soon as I finish writing the above, I, then, find this....
In post 202, Starbuck wrote:As I said when I saw that post, I went to bed early. Way to completely misrepresent, Spiffeh. I'm not quite sure if this is scum-Spiffeh or town-tunneling Spiffeh yet. I want to lean to the town-tunnel, but this is ridiculous.
In post 202, Starbuck wrote:DGB's continued sheeping of Spiffeh is suspect, as are Syryana and Ythan's jumps. What in the actual fuck? Is that L-1?
In post 203, Starbuck wrote:And now I'm stuck because I don't know what's scummier...
-Iec placing a vote after just not reading at all and seeing that it was just a stupid RVS vote
-Spiffeh seemingly to start an opportunistic case and bus on me
-All the sheepers who have said not one word about me and tossed naked votes
Those are all scummy actions in retrospect.
In post 245, MattP wrote:I bet I can stretch Starbuck's post to be town-minded in its entirely, just like Syryana stretched every aspect of it to be scummy.
Like, that was not a fair assessment of Starbuck's post at all.
In post 246, MattP wrote:No post is ever scummy enough to do that.
In post 248, Syryana wrote:Okay. So what is a fair assessment then?