D3sisted -
SPAG -
With 11 alive, it's six to lynch.
So instead of trying to shoot down WHY I'm asking, how about you, and everyone else, answers WHY your vote is on me?Desisted wrote:I've noticed that IH is getting pretty tense about those pressure votes, including his case against me, which I see as an OMGUS response. What I mean is, I put a vote on him, and he instantly tries to deflect suspicion back onto me. Coupled with his post above, this is a very odd response I'm seeing.
I said in my first post here that I didn't like the fact you lash out against anybody who accuses you. I see it as OMGUS and a scumtell. If you think I am wrong, explain to me why. If you think I am scum, explain to me why. But just making comments like this doesn't do you any favours.d3sisted wrote: ...and vollkan comes to the scumbuddy's rescue with the bandwagon vote.
IH asked for the case against him to be explained by everyone on his wagon. It was not OMGUS "deflecting" onto you and nor did it seem rather tense. I want to see what you have to say to determine if I have missed something on IH. I don't think I have, but you seem so convinced about IH, so presumably you can articulate a coherent case rather than simply ranting and calling people scum.d3sisted wrote: I've noticed that IH is getting pretty tense about those pressure votes, including his case against me, which I see as an OMGUS response. What I mean is, I put a vote on him, and he instantly tries to deflect suspicion back onto me. Coupled with his post above, this is a very odd response I'm seeing.
heh whats the difference between bandwagoning and getting a game started?Paradoxombie wrote:Trumpeiza is nowhere to be found, and poppinpuffin seems to have just been randomly bandwagoning. Is anyone particularly supicious of IH besides d3sisted?
Maybe IH is scum; I don't think so but I can't be sure. Nonetheless, I don't quite see why you are ignoring the suspicion I have of you. Again, you are deflecting it to make it seem like I am just conspiring against you, rather than acknowledging any legitimacy to my argument.d3sisted wrote: Maybe I randomly vote and happened to hit scum. IH gets nervous for being put L-2 so quickly, and you leap onto a rival wagon.
I'm definitely liking what we're getting out of this pressure wagon.
But you yourself made it look like you had a reason for continuing to vote IH by saying this:d3s wrote: In response to an earlier question, I consider IH to be nervous/apprehensive because he overreacts to a pressure vote, thinking it's a permanent vote and that I have reasons to back it up.
Maybe you did initially vote on the basis of pressure, but you have since started throwing accusations around with no basis at all, other than "getting tense" which I can't see any evidence for.d3s wrote: So most of your points are about me seemingly "trying to sound scum".
What I'm curious to know is, where did you draw the line between genuine and fraudulent? Because clearly you imply that my statements are townie, so what exactly is tipping you off to make you think I am pretending?
Unless you just plain disagree with my statements, in which case I implore you to state a valid case.
So me wondering why you're randomly on a wagon is nervous.Desisted wrote:Maybe I randomly vote and happened to hit scum. IH gets nervous for being put L-2 so quickly, and you leap onto a rival wagon.
I'm definitely liking what we're getting out of this pressure wagon.
In response to an earlier question, I consider IH to be nervous/apprehensive because he overreacts to a pressure vote, thinking it's a permanent vote and that I have reasons to back it up.
IH wrote:How definite a statement for page 4.I'm also unsure of your first string of logic of trying to seem town.
I just realized this is in response to Trump, so doesn't apply.IH wrote:Yet here you say the opposite, don't you? Or are you trying to force a statement that,to intentionally look like town,I said "what do you mean by masons?" Just curious to how that is scummy.
IH wrote:Untrue, majorly. You are suspicious of them. WHY are you suspicious of them? unvote, vote:Desisted I'm just assuming you're just trying to eitherA.Cast suspicion on someone, or B.declare suspicion on someone so you can say you've been suspicious of them.
Bolded parts.IH wrote:Hey, isn't [establish suspicion without actual substance] what desisted did?
I've quite explicitly told everyone I bandwagoned to generate discussion. Yet you still think I'm on for real so rather than try to assist the discussion, you try to use it against me as evidence.IH wrote:So me wondering why you're randomly on a wagon is nervous.
My mistake, L-3. But that just contributes to what I said earlier.IH wrote:Also I was never at lynch minus two. It's 6 to lynch.
Then justify it. Denial won't get you anywhere. Turn off the tunnel vision and tell me why Poppinpuffin's 144 is cleared, yet I'm in the spotlight.IH wrote:I'm not being tense, I'm playing this game.
Well. You're staying on it. You have no reasons. We're not in the random stage. You act like you have a case. You don't.Desisted wrote:I've quite explicitly told everyone I bandwagoned to generate discussion. Yet you still think I'm on for real so rather than try to assist the discussion, you try to use it against me as evidence.
no it detracts from it.Desisted wrote:My mistake, L-3. But that just contributes to what I said earlier.
Because she never claimed to have a reason.Desisted wrote:Then justify it. Denial won't get you anywhere. Turn off the tunnel vision and tell me why Poppinpuffin's 144 is cleared, yet I'm in the spotlight.
This indicates you made a case against me and voted me for a good reason, and for me to avoid that case I deflected suspicion onto you. But I didn't deflect anything, because, well, there was nothing to deflect from. I'm just plain suspicous of you.Desisted wrote:I've noticed that IH is getting pretty tense about those pressure votes, including his case against me, which I see as an OMGUS response. What I mean is, I put a vote on him, and he instantly tries to deflect suspicion back onto me. Coupled with his post above, this is a very odd response I'm seeing.