Blitz 12: Double Trouble! (Game Over)

Squirrelly · Post Post #125 (ISO) » Wed Dec 09, 2015 6:46 am

Titus: is this the dumb association part of you again?
I have to ask because I'm not sure if I should start raging yet or not

Errantparabola · Post Post #126 (ISO) » Wed Dec 09, 2015 6:47 am

Considering i have explicitly stated i dont scumread fire, i dont see how you are comfortable with saying that i am weak-scumreading fire.

AlwaysInnocent · Post Post #127 (ISO) » Wed Dec 09, 2015 6:47 am

In post 113, Errantparabola wrote:
In post 81, AlwaysInnocent wrote:Ranger, while I appreciate it that you are correctly townreading me, it seems a bit too early to throw around so many reads. What makes you think all these people are town?

"Correctly townreading me"
Ugh.

It is probably annoying, since you cannot verify this (yet). But it is the truth. And it matters, because other people are incorrectly scumreading me.

I try and detach myself from meta. What Im saying is having confident early reads is part of ranger's playstyle and should go either town or scum.
I think.

But that

is

meta-reading her.

AlwaysInnocent, do you have anything to add other than asking people to explain their reads? Your questions have a trend of really weakly contributing. Im fine with my vote.

This will get better as the game progresses. It is better than throwing around reads without explanation. You cannot even respond to them properly.

Honestly, I would not consider other people's contributions to be that much better, or "stronger".

Titus · Post Post #128 (ISO) » Wed Dec 09, 2015 6:47 am

In post 125, Squirrelly wrote:Titus: is this the dumb association part of you again?
I have to ask because I'm not sure if I should start raging yet or not

I don't recall ever playing with you.

Second, "dumb association"? Talk to me about your Dwelee read.

Errantparabola · Post Post #129 (ISO) » Wed Dec 09, 2015 6:48 am

In post 126, Errantparabola wrote:Considering i have explicitly stated i dont scumread fire, i dont see how you are comfortable with saying that i am weak-scumreading fire.

Maybe not explicitly. But i have said it.

Squirrelly · Post Post #130 (ISO) » Wed Dec 09, 2015 6:49 am

Dwlee is doing a lot of joking even past the rvs stage while throwing shade at errant.
Also the vote on beebop and buddying.

In post 54, Dwlee99 wrote:Oh gawd not errantparabola. Please don't let him live to mylo/lylo. pleaseeee

In post 57, Dwlee99 wrote:
In post 56, Titus wrote:
In post 54, Dwlee99 wrote:Oh gawd not errantparabola. Please don't let him live to mylo/lylo. pleaseeee

You now are second on my lynch list.

My most recent completed game he fooled everyone and was scum. Don't let him f-ing live.

In post 63, Dwlee99 wrote:But LOOK at that trenchcoat, yakko. It is the number #1 scum tell on idiot's guide to mafia volume pi. It is 100% accurate

In post 77, Dwlee99 wrote:
In post 76, Squirrelly wrote:
In post 64, Firebringer wrote:
In post 54, Dwlee99 wrote:Oh gawd not errantparabola. Please don't let him live to mylo/lylo. pleaseeee

Ummm what game?
I don't think I have had a recent scum win.
Wait are you talking about me even?

As has been said...are you being intentionally dense?

^

I think I have with this vote
VOTE: Beboparebop
I do not like the promise of reads this early.

Squirrelly · Post Post #131 (ISO) » Wed Dec 09, 2015 6:50 am

In post 128, Titus wrote:
In post 125, Squirrelly wrote:Titus: is this the dumb association part of you again?
I have to ask because I'm not sure if I should start raging yet or not

I don't recall ever playing with you.

Second, "dumb association"? Talk to me about your Dwelee read.

Farside here.
You want to discuss another speed game with your association reads?

Titus · Post Post #132 (ISO) » Wed Dec 09, 2015 6:50 am

In post 89, AlwaysInnocent wrote:I know that people sometimes have weak reasons to have some ill-informed opinion about someone during this stage, but it seems like he is just throwing around reads for the sake of appearing town. He has not even explained
any
of these reads, as far as I can see.

I am compelled to leave my non-conformist identity behind and join the Ranger wagon.

This post is awkward as shit. You suddenly start talking in very distant language. Some people. They. Pings hard.

Squirrelly · Post Post #133 (ISO) » Wed Dec 09, 2015 6:51 am

In post 126, Errantparabola wrote:Considering i have explicitly stated i dont scumread fire, i dont see how you are comfortable with saying that i am weak-scumreading fire.

You also said you don't see town fire in what I quoted

Titus · Post Post #134 (ISO) » Wed Dec 09, 2015 6:53 am

In post 130, Squirrelly wrote:Dwlee is doing a lot of joking even past the rvs stage while throwing shade at errant.
Also the vote on beebop and buddying.

In post 54, Dwlee99 wrote:Oh gawd not errantparabola. Please don't let him live to mylo/lylo. pleaseeee

In post 57, Dwlee99 wrote:
In post 56, Titus wrote:
In post 54, Dwlee99 wrote:Oh gawd not errantparabola. Please don't let him live to mylo/lylo. pleaseeee

You now are second on my lynch list.

My most recent completed game he fooled everyone and was scum. Don't let him f-ing live.

In post 63, Dwlee99 wrote:But LOOK at that trenchcoat, yakko. It is the number #1 scum tell on idiot's guide to mafia volume pi. It is 100% accurate

In post 77, Dwlee99 wrote:
In post 76, Squirrelly wrote:
In post 64, Firebringer wrote:
In post 54, Dwlee99 wrote:Oh gawd not errantparabola. Please don't let him live to mylo/lylo. pleaseeee

Ummm what game?
I don't think I have had a recent scum win.
Wait are you talking about me even?

As has been said...are you being intentionally dense?

^

I think I have with this vote
VOTE: Beboparebop
I do not like the promise of reads this early.

He's not buddying me. That's for sure. The tone wasn't serious in his early posts. I misread it. The trench coat is a joke. I liked the last post you quoted a lot. Each post in a blitz needs a purpose. Saying I will post reads later just looks like a way to dodge the spotlight.

Titus · Post Post #135 (ISO) » Wed Dec 09, 2015 6:54 am

In post 131, Squirrelly wrote:
In post 128, Titus wrote:
In post 125, Squirrelly wrote:Titus: is this the dumb association part of you again?
I have to ask because I'm not sure if I should start raging yet or not

I don't recall ever playing with you.

Second, "dumb association"? Talk to me about your Dwelee read.

Farside here.
You want to discuss another speed game with your association reads?

Blitz 1. Sure. Let's discuss it.

You're town. Dwelee town. Ranger town (we should agree on this one). Let's go.

AlwaysInnocent · Post Post #136 (ISO) » Wed Dec 09, 2015 6:56 am

In post 132, Titus wrote:
In post 89, AlwaysInnocent wrote:I know that people sometimes have weak reasons to have some ill-informed opinion about someone during this stage, but it seems like he is just throwing around reads for the sake of appearing town. He has not even explained
any
of these reads, as far as I can see.

I am compelled to leave my non-conformist identity behind and join the Ranger wagon.

This post is awkward as shit. You suddenly start talking in very distant language. Some people. They. Pings hard.

This is how you scumread people? You must be kidding, right? Or are you intentionally trying to make me look suspicious, setting me up?

If you want to know, I usually talk in a distant language. I do not see how I "changed" that. In addition, I do not see how that post is overly "distant" as to be noteworthy in any way.

Why are you so defensive about Ranger anyway? Are you deflecting?

Errantparabola · Post Post #137 (ISO) » Wed Dec 09, 2015 6:58 am

Why are you not similarly attacking my push on you, innocent?
Squirrelly, just because i say im not confident in fire being town doesnt mean i have a scumread. Again, even if i had a weak scumread, i would vote.

Titus · Post Post #138 (ISO) » Wed Dec 09, 2015 6:59 am

Word choice is how I start. Second, the word choice in that post is very different than others you have. You use a lot of I and specific names. That post is vague as fuck.

Also, town blocking is good.

Errantparabola · Post Post #139 (ISO) » Wed Dec 09, 2015 7:00 am

Also, just because someone is joking in a blitz doesnt mean that slot is scum. And i find it odd that you're trying to push that because thats the kind of logic that sets us up for mislynches.

Errantparabola · Post Post #140 (ISO) » Wed Dec 09, 2015 7:01 am

Actually scratch ehat i just said, i think i misread that.

Titus · Post Post #141 (ISO) » Wed Dec 09, 2015 7:07 am

Squirrel, talk to me.

AlwaysInnocent · Post Post #142 (ISO) » Wed Dec 09, 2015 7:08 am

In post 138, Titus wrote:Word choice is how I start. Second, the word choice in that post is very different than others you have. You use a lot of I and specific names. That post is vague as fuck.

Also, town blocking is good.

How is it vague? The only possibly "distant" part is:

"I know that people sometimes have weak reasons to have some ill-informed opinion about someone during this stage."

This is a general statement. As someone who values generality, I tend to speak in general statements. So when something applies to many people, I say "people". But in order to account for the fact that it does not occur all the time, I say "sometimes" (although I should have said "often" instead, which would have been more accurate). Or is it vague because I may have preferred to leave out "ill-informed", since this could be considered redundant (weak reasons lead to ill-informed opinions)?

Town blocking is good, if you have a good reason to believe that someone is town. You have so far not explained why you think Ranger is town.

AlwaysInnocent · Post Post #143 (ISO) » Wed Dec 09, 2015 7:09 am

In post 137, Errantparabola wrote:Why are you not similarly attacking my push on you, innocent?
Squirrelly, just because i say im not confident in fire being town doesnt mean i have a scumread. Again, even if i had a weak scumread, i would vote.

You will get your turn. I cannot handle everyone at the same time. But you probably already knew that.

Titus · Post Post #144 (ISO) » Wed Dec 09, 2015 7:14 am

@AI, It's good enough for me.

If you're so convinced Ranger is scum, why aren't you voting him?

"Some people", "sometimes" "they". When you provide no reference, it's vague and distancy. :p moon logic ftw

AlwaysInnocent · Post Post #145 (ISO) » Wed Dec 09, 2015 7:20 am

Anyway,

VOTE: Errantparabola

For being sneaky and trying to push a lynch on me (even implicitly inviting Titus to do so), then asking me why I am not immediately responding to him when I have my hands full on Titus, as if he did not know.

PhantomCobalt · Post Post #146 (ISO) » Wed Dec 09, 2015 7:24 am

Catching up, will post my thoughts tonight.

Errantparabola · Post Post #147 (ISO) » Wed Dec 09, 2015 7:24 am

In post 145, AlwaysInnocent wrote:Anyway,

VOTE: Errantparabola

For being sneaky and trying to push a lynch on me (even implicitly inviting Titus to do so), then asking me why I am not immediately responding to him when I have my hands full on Titus, as if he did not know.

How am i sneakily trying to push a lynch on you?
Im pretty blatantly trying to do it. Because i think you are scum.

Errantparabola · Post Post #148 (ISO) » Wed Dec 09, 2015 7:25 am

And i find it odd that i pushed on you first, and then you waited for titus to post a case on you, which you responded to. Like you're picking and choosing what to respond to.

AlwaysInnocent · Post Post #149 (ISO) » Wed Dec 09, 2015 7:26 am

In post 144, Titus wrote:@AI, It's good enough for me.

If you're so convinced Ranger is scum, why aren't you voting him?

You said she was strongly town. I thought she was suspicious and openly considered voting for her (I explained why). It seems you are more confident about her alignment than me, so why are you not explaining why you are townreading her?

"Some people", "sometimes" "they". When you provide no reference, it's vague and distancy. :p moon logic ftw

Do you really think that is a scumtell? I think strategies are far more telling.

What do you mean by providing no reference? I thought it was clear that this referred to early-D1.