Blitz 12: Double Trouble! (Game Over)

Squirrelly · Post Post #425 (ISO) » Sat Dec 12, 2015 4:22 pm

In post 423, Titus wrote:
In post 420, Squirrelly wrote:
In post 417, Titus wrote:Go ahead and push.

Why did you jk me in the first place?

Cuz you'd be the person I would send for a kill if scum.

And yet your attacking me for not dying?

Seriously that train of thought doesn't match

Titus · Post Post #426 (ISO) » Sat Dec 12, 2015 4:23 pm

No I really don't read crumbs. I leave em but I don't see em.

Second, you buy me jking you. So if that's the case someone else saw them.

Titus · Post Post #427 (ISO) » Sat Dec 12, 2015 4:23 pm

In post 425, Squirrelly wrote:
In post 423, Titus wrote:
In post 420, Squirrelly wrote:
In post 417, Titus wrote:Go ahead and push.

Why did you jk me in the first place?

Cuz you'd be the person I would send for a kill if scum.

And yet your attacking me for not dying?

Seriously that train of thought doesn't match

No I am attacking you because there was one death.

BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie · Post Post #428 (ISO) » Sat Dec 12, 2015 4:24 pm

Titus, can you explain how that makes squirrelly scum? If you jailed them, then you yourself said you could have either protected or role blocked them. That makes this a 50/50, what is pushing you to say that squirrelly is scum?

Squirrelly · Post Post #429 (ISO) » Sat Dec 12, 2015 4:27 pm

In post 426, Titus wrote:No I really don't read crumbs. I leave em but I don't see em.

Second, you buy me jking you. So if that's the case someone else saw them.

No I'm asking you questions about it.

I'm not going to point to my crumb any further since all your saying is I'm voting squirrelly because she didn't die and I would kill her but she must be scum that submitted the kill.
That's like taking a cake and chocking on it.

Squirrelly · Post Post #430 (ISO) » Sat Dec 12, 2015 4:28 pm

By the way Titus looks for crumbs in this game: http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... b#p7364687
So again I'm going to call her a liar again

Titus · Post Post #431 (ISO) » Sat Dec 12, 2015 4:29 pm

In post 428, BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie wrote:Titus, can you explain how that makes squirrelly scum? If you jailed them, then you yourself said you could have either protected or role blocked them. That makes this a 50/50, what is pushing you to say that squirrelly is scum?

Her response. I told her the truth. I believed she was the reason for the one kill. That is true of roleblock or heal. Squirrel jumps to attack me and imply I am lying.

Scum tend the twniest looking scum and I didn't like how close you two were.

If I am wrong, having documentation she was the other team's kill is good.

Titus · Post Post #432 (ISO) » Sat Dec 12, 2015 4:30 pm

In post 430, Squirrelly wrote:By the way Titus looks for crumbs in this game: http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... b#p7364687
So again I'm going to call her a liar again

I didn't go looking for that. Twas a sledgehammer.

Squirrelly · Post Post #433 (ISO) » Sat Dec 12, 2015 4:30 pm

In post 431, Titus wrote:
In post 428, BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie wrote:Titus, can you explain how that makes squirrelly scum? If you jailed them, then you yourself said you could have either protected or role blocked them. That makes this a 50/50, what is pushing you to say that squirrelly is scum?

Her response. I told her the truth. I believed she was the reason for the one kill. That is true of roleblock or heal. Squirrel jumps to attack me and imply I am lying.

Scum tend the twniest looking scum and I didn't like how close you two were.

If I am wrong, having documentation she was the other team's kill is good.

No you voted me.
There was nothing clear about protecting me at all

Titus · Post Post #434 (ISO) » Sat Dec 12, 2015 4:31 pm

I voted you because you needed resolution and the facts needed to come out.

Squirrelly · Post Post #435 (ISO) » Sat Dec 12, 2015 4:31 pm

In post 432, Titus wrote:
In post 430, Squirrelly wrote:By the way Titus looks for crumbs in this game: http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... b#p7364687
So again I'm going to call her a liar again

I didn't go looking for that. Twas a sledgehammer.

I could post more, admittley mine was sutle.

Squirrelly · Post Post #436 (ISO) » Sat Dec 12, 2015 4:32 pm

In post 434, Titus wrote:I voted you because you needed resolution and the facts needed to come out.

That doesn't imply a town read at all or even hey maybe I protected a town read.
It's you pushing it as stopping a scum kill when I'm not scum.

BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie · Post Post #437 (ISO) » Sat Dec 12, 2015 4:33 pm

I guess I see that. I will say I believe your claim on role and action. I'm not sure about the reasoning.

Titus · Post Post #438 (ISO) » Sat Dec 12, 2015 4:35 pm

In post 436, Squirrelly wrote:
In post 434, Titus wrote:I voted you because you needed resolution and the facts needed to come out.

That doesn't imply a town read at all or even hey maybe I protected a town read.
It's you pushing it as stopping a scum kill when I'm not scum.

I lost my townread on you when we lynched town.

Titus · Post Post #439 (ISO) » Sat Dec 12, 2015 4:36 pm

So squirrely are you still going to call me a liar on jailing you?

Squirrelly · Post Post #440 (ISO) » Sat Dec 12, 2015 4:37 pm

In post 438, Titus wrote:
In post 436, Squirrelly wrote:
In post 434, Titus wrote:I voted you because you needed resolution and the facts needed to come out.

That doesn't imply a town read at all or even hey maybe I protected a town read.
It's you pushing it as stopping a scum kill when I'm not scum.

I lost my townread on you when we lynched town.

I wasn't on that wagon?
I put a question mark because persivul switched it again and I missed it

Squirrelly · Post Post #441 (ISO) » Sat Dec 12, 2015 4:39 pm

In post 439, Titus wrote:So squirrely are you still going to call me a liar on jailing you?

Considering you push and reasoning, yes I am

Squirrelly · Post Post #442 (ISO) » Sat Dec 12, 2015 4:45 pm

Here is why I don't believe Titus and her claim.
She attacks do to one death but acts like it should be clear with her vote it could be protective.
Her scum read is based on lynching pc, we weren't on the wagon so that is crap and not a single post seems to go on the assumption of protecting, which is what a town protective role would think too.

In post 411, Titus wrote:
In post 408, Squirrelly wrote:
In post 398, Titus wrote:Only one death...

VOTE: Squirrel

Did you betray me? I think you tried.

I have no clue what your issue is.
If you expect me to be a mind reader your going to be dissapointed greatly

And if I said you're the reason there was only one kill?

In post 413, Titus wrote:Funny, I could a jailed you or kills repeat. Interesting you jump to lying.

In post 398, Titus wrote:Only one death...

VOTE: Squirrel

Did you betray me? I think you tried.

In post 415, Titus wrote:
In post 414, Squirrelly wrote:
In post 413, Titus wrote:Funny, I could a jailed you or kills repeat. Interesting you jump to lying.

You voted me.
That doesn't imply jk or saving in the least

It implies you need to be resolved. Jailkeeper doesn't know whether they blocked or healed you. Thus needing resolution.

In post 423, Titus wrote:
In post 420, Squirrelly wrote:
In post 417, Titus wrote:Go ahead and push.

Why did you jk me in the first place?

Cuz you'd be the person I would send for a kill if scum.

In post 426, Titus wrote:No I really don't read crumbs. I leave em but I don't see em.

Second, you buy me jking you. So if that's the case someone else saw them.

In post 427, Titus wrote:
In post 425, Squirrelly wrote:
In post 423, Titus wrote:
In post 420, Squirrelly wrote:
In post 417, Titus wrote:Go ahead and push.

Why did you jk me in the first place?

Cuz you'd be the person I would send for a kill if scum.

And yet your attacking me for not dying?

Seriously that train of thought doesn't match

No I am attacking you because there was one death.

In post 431, Titus wrote:
In post 428, BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie wrote:Titus, can you explain how that makes squirrelly scum? If you jailed them, then you yourself said you could have either protected or role blocked them. That makes this a 50/50, what is pushing you to say that squirrelly is scum?

Her response. I told her the truth. I believed she was the reason for the one kill. That is true of roleblock or heal. Squirrel jumps to attack me and imply I am lying.

Scum tend the twniest looking scum and I didn't like how close you two were.

If I am wrong, having documentation she was the other team's kill is good.

In post 438, Titus wrote:
In post 436, Squirrelly wrote:
In post 434, Titus wrote:I voted you because you needed resolution and the facts needed to come out.

That doesn't imply a town read at all or even hey maybe I protected a town read.
It's you pushing it as stopping a scum kill when I'm not scum.

I lost my townread on you when we lynched town.

Titus · Post Post #443 (ISO) » Sat Dec 12, 2015 4:47 pm

In post 440, Squirrelly wrote:
In post 438, Titus wrote:
In post 436, Squirrelly wrote:
In post 434, Titus wrote:I voted you because you needed resolution and the facts needed to come out.

That doesn't imply a town read at all or even hey maybe I protected a town read.
It's you pushing it as stopping a scum kill when I'm not scum.

I lost my townread on you when we lynched town.

I wasn't on that wagon?
I put a question mark because persivul switched it again and I missed it

You backed off at the last second.

Squirrelly · Post Post #444 (ISO) » Sat Dec 12, 2015 4:50 pm

In post 443, Titus wrote:
In post 440, Squirrelly wrote:
In post 438, Titus wrote:
In post 436, Squirrelly wrote:
In post 434, Titus wrote:I voted you because you needed resolution and the facts needed to come out.

That doesn't imply a town read at all or even hey maybe I protected a town read.
It's you pushing it as stopping a scum kill when I'm not scum.

I lost my townread on you when we lynched town.

I wasn't on that wagon?
I put a question mark because persivul switched it again and I missed it

You backed off at the last second.

Thats bullshit.
Persivul voted and that was clear as day.

Titus · Post Post #445 (ISO) » Sat Dec 12, 2015 4:51 pm

Point blank: I healed or stopped you. I wanted pressure to determine which.

You said you crumbed a role. Said role must not get feedback, thus you would know I blocked you.

You made a post where you assumed my block to be true.

You're assuming I came out here and blatantly lied about jailing you for shits and jiggle. Nope.

Titus · Post Post #446 (ISO) » Sat Dec 12, 2015 4:51 pm

You are your slot.

Squirrels needs votes.

BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie · Post Post #447 (ISO) » Sat Dec 12, 2015 4:54 pm

Titus, what is your take on 410? I mean on the people squirrely suggested? I going to ask this when you two started fighting.

Titus · Post Post #448 (ISO) » Sat Dec 12, 2015 5:00 pm

Vote the counter wagon if a townie is lynched based on nothing. Not happy.

Titus · Post Post #449 (ISO) » Sat Dec 12, 2015 5:01 pm

Meaning the wanderer vote is based on nothing.

But hey multiball.