Nachomamma8 (1): Lady Lambdadelta
MattP (1): kanyeknowsbest
Syryana (2): Ythan, Starbuck
Spiffeh (1): Iecerint
Not Voting:
In post 1501, DrippingGoofball wrote:In post 1499, pirate mollie wrote:wow
I don't believe it's alignment related, sorry.
In post 1365, Spiffeh wrote:In post 1330, Starbuck wrote:That's blatantly untrue. I *NEVER* said that I suspected Spiffeh.
In post 1097, Starbuck wrote:This isn't the town Spiffeh that I've seen in the past however many games.
In post 1102, Starbuck wrote:I do feel that Spiffeh is really fucking weird this game with how much he's calling for my death. I've played quite a bit with Spiffeh over the past month or so of being back. In other situations, I felt like I could talk with him and have a conversation. Here it's just straight out abrasive (in a game sense) with no chance of him even reconsidering his stance.
Isn't this you suspecting me?
Also the way you keep reiterating that you won't be voting for me/don't suspect me now makes you think you are flipping scum and trying to perpetuate this notion that we are scumbuddies so I can be mislynched next day.
In post 1384, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Seriously though, that Starbuck wagon is unhealthy and needs a culling.
A cleansing fire, if you will.
In post 1410, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:In post 1409, Syryana wrote:
Yes!
In post 1408, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Starbuck's wagon is disgusting and the way it grew was bad in a very very trolly way
No.
So you'll bet your life against Starbuck's then?
If she flips town, I can lynch you tomorrow?
You're ok with that?
In post 1420, Iecerint wrote:See, I never feel that confident as town, so that makes me pretty nervous!
I basically only do what you are doing when I am SCUM providing ORDER to the FRIGHTENED MASSES.
Not saying this is externally valid to you but that is just what I am comparing it to in my head.
In post 1432, Spiffeh wrote:Because has been parked all day and I want to see where your head is at?
In post 1449, Nachomamma8 wrote:In post 1342, Starbuck wrote:So why should I resign myself to this lynch when my top scum read is saying that he'll save my lover?
no one said you should resign yourself to a lynch
but when your top scum read claims confirmable information, it's usually polite to at least consider the possibility he is telling the truth/determine what he has to gain from lying
In post 1457, Ythan wrote:In post 1455, Syryana wrote:In post 1449, Nachomamma8 wrote:In post 1342, Starbuck wrote:So why should I resign myself to this lynch when my top scum read is saying that he'll save my lover?
no one said you should resign yourself to a lynch
but when your top scum read claims confirmable information, it's usually polite to at least consider the possibility he is telling the truth/determine what he has to gain from lying
I tried and failed this already Nacho, don't bother
Stop trashposting thx.
In post 1495, DrippingGoofball wrote:And the rest of his iso is loaded with banter that is not game-related, like a good little scum.
In post 1503, Starbuck wrote:And what I mean by "this isn't the town Spiffeh that I've seen" is that it isn't. I feel like you've been really brash where in experiences over the past few weeks (both ongoing and non) that you really weren't in those other situations. I don't really know how much better that I can explain it.
In post 1504, Starbuck wrote:1. It's a bullshit reason to lynch me because isn't the point of lovers to not be able to isolate them? Why would we be in the game if you could just kill us each with no problem? It doesn't make sense.
In post 1504, Starbuck wrote:The loss of two possible Town. I don't know mollie's alignment.
In post 1511, Nachomamma8 wrote:In post 1503, Starbuck wrote:And what I mean by "this isn't the town Spiffeh that I've seen" is that it isn't. I feel like you've been really brash where in experiences over the past few weeks (both ongoing and non) that you really weren't in those other situations. I don't really know how much better that I can explain it.
but you're townreading him despite his play being really really weird because he's genuine?
In post 1512, Nachomamma8 wrote:In post 1504, Starbuck wrote:1. It's a bullshit reason to lynch me because isn't the point of lovers to not be able to isolate them? Why would we be in the game if you could just kill us each with no problem? It doesn't make sense.
Giving town the ability to save one of them makes sense in a scum/town pairing since it rewards town for good reads and rewards scum for good play. It makes less sense in a town/town pairing depending on what Syryana's restrictions are but could also be in order to make town think of the first scenario.
Katsuki could have also failed to figure out that particular interaction because he's Katsuki and let it slide because that was the fairest thing to do based on what he told Syryana his role was.
In post 1513, Nachomamma8 wrote:In post 1504, Starbuck wrote:The loss of two possible Town. I don't know mollie's alignment.
He kills two town at 12 alive, meaning he's instantly lynched tomorrow and we are only down one mislynch. Does that seem worth it to you from a scum perspective?
In post 1516, MattP wrote:This whole "Spiffeh is being so weird" thing has gone on since like D1 and you've still not managed to put forth any sort of new development on that stance during that time, like - I don't know - a read?
In post 1520, Starbuck wrote:In post 1516, MattP wrote:This whole "Spiffeh is being so weird" thing has gone on since like D1 and you've still not managed to put forth any sort of new development on that stance during that time, like - I don't know - a read?
I said that I can see it coming from a town stand point, and hence my nonvote on Spiffeh.
I feel like you guys aren't really reading what I've said.