In post 649, Aj The Epic wrote:Ice, unless you somehow believe that town has a minority, scum can't send this to night.
Yeah but you can try to convince town to go to night. And you might even succeed if lynches keep failing to go through.
Also, there's probably 2 scum left. So my one buddy is going to send this to night? And don't feed me the "There could be 3". If you don't believe there are 2 scum left, then why did you support Buckwild?
I think Buckwild was scum but I'm not 100% sure. Unless you believe you should only lynch if there's a signed confession in triplicate, I don't see the problem here.
I did not coordinate a kill. Jesus Christ you have your panties in a knot over this. No one in the town is going to send this to night. I'm also not pushing a lurker narrative: There's no need to do so. The current way I want this played is to take out Itle/Hip and possibly you.
Looks like I became a suspect right after I decided to call you out as scum! That's quite a coincidence!
If I coordinate a lynch on you, it's not due to lurking (since Sun and the guy we haven't heard of from days are obviously the lurkers) but due to your connections to other lynches. I want activity and feel you're just using the standard script of me killing your motivation. That doesn't fly.
I never claimed you're killing my motivation. You're misrepping me.
Your 'other arguments'? This isn't an argument, this is just bad logic. It's PERFECTLY USELESS to 'coordinate a kill' if we're not going to night.
First of all, that's not my only argument. You haven't said anything about the hiplop push, for instance. Or about you trying to line up lynches.
Also, you seem to somehow be able to predict the future, given that you're saying we aren't going to night.
And WHY THE HELL would I push to look for NK coordination if I WAS THE ONE SIGNALING? Wouldn't it be better just to let that discussion not exist and just take nacho's view?
I'm not sure what you're trying to say here. You coordinated a NK and thought you could coast on your towncred.