In post 346, hi im Yakko wrote:And mattp the genesis of the idea of yakko scum was so good that you took to it immidiately it is very clear you're eager and impatient for my lynch as you realize this is mostly pleasantries that we're dealing with here or am I wrong? And you didn't think yakko scum looked good and shiny?
In post 336, hi im Yakko wrote:@ocean we can have a conversation I promise. I can't read your mind bro.
In post 41, hi im Yakko wrote:Defending your scumbud lucian?
In post 68, OceanWind wrote:In post 63, MattP wrote:In post 62, OceanWind wrote:What is your read on Pisskop now, MattP? And your read on Wisdom?
Lol, it's page 2 of the game and they're both good players,I don't have reads.Neither strike me in a negative sense atm.
I read a few games that you happened to be in. My impression was that you made yourself obvtown pretty quickly when you were town. So, I went back through your posting history and grabbed a couple of random games:
Disney uPick - You had a scumread on page 1.
Air Combat Mafia - You had a scumread on post 3.
Small sample size but it seems like you get reads relatively quickly. So, the bolded sounds like bullshit. Not to mention Wisdom and Pisskop both look fairly obvious town and I expect a player of your caliber to have picked up on it already based on what I've seen from you.
In post 69, LucianRoy wrote:Ocean, I'm not a fan of meta, but if MattP really wanted to have reads on those players, he could've whipped something up easily. Instead, he chose to play the "let's wait and see" game before jumping the gun on them. I'm doubting his caution is as bullshit as you say it is.
VOTE: Ocean
In post 352, OceanWind wrote:In post 336, hi im Yakko wrote:@ocean we can have a conversation I promise. I can't read your mind bro.
Anxiety townread Pisskop because Pisskop suggested a PL. Why didn't you ever ask about it when you've made a big deal out of my townread of Pisskop and went so far as to say that it was playstyle, not alignment?
In post 358, Wisdom wrote:I don't see what is easy about that.
In post 359, OceanWind wrote:@Hi im yakko
You keep ignoring my question while you've been answering others. Is there any reason I shouldn't assume that you are ignoring it because you have no response?
In post 352, OceanWind wrote:In post 336, hi im Yakko wrote:@ocean we can have a conversation I promise. I can't read your mind bro.
Anxiety townread Pisskop because Pisskop suggested a PL. Why didn't you ever ask about it when you've made a big deal out of my townread of Pisskop and went so far as to say that it was playstyle, not alignment?
In post 362, Anxiety Attack wrote:Yakko would you lynch ranger right now given the chance?
In post 361, Wisdom wrote:I personally see it as Lucian thinking Ocean is trying to manipulate meta to push a shitcase on Matt.
In post 366, Wisdom wrote:I am townreading Ocean, but it has nothing to do with that post. Don't get the point of your question though?
In post 371, MattP wrote:Actually, please just requote, I can't parse because a lot of your posts have pedits with no pronouns to direct who they're at so its hard to determine what you're asking of me @anxiety
In post 372, Anxiety Attack wrote:In post 371, MattP wrote:Actually, please just requote, I can't parse because a lot of your posts have pedits with no pronouns to direct who they're at so its hard to determine what you're asking of me @anxiety
Ummm i dunno what it was offhand but i knew the question in general:
what is your read on ranger if you have one? would you be willing to lynch that today? also do you have a read on wisdom and pisskop?
UNVOTE:
im about to head to work but i want to do another read though after the entire exchange went down.