In post 1724, Shinobi wrote:Except I'm not doing that?
I pointed out the fact that he made up reasons to vote MM which has nothing to do with VCA whatsoever.
Made up is a circular reason unless you show those reasons to be untrue.
In post 1724, Shinobi wrote:Except I'm not doing that?
I pointed out the fact that he made up reasons to vote MM which has nothing to do with VCA whatsoever.
In post 1727, Elyse wrote:Pls let that be real
In post 1725, Titus wrote:In post 1724, Shinobi wrote:Except I'm not doing that?
I pointed out the fact that he made up reasons to vote MM which has nothing to do with VCA whatsoever.
Made up is a circular reason unless you show those reasons to be untrue.
In post 1730, Shinobi wrote:In post 1725, Titus wrote:In post 1724, Shinobi wrote:Except I'm not doing that?
I pointed out the fact that he made up reasons to vote MM which has nothing to do with VCA whatsoever.
Made up is a circular reason unless you show those reasons to be untrue.
What are you talking about? This doesn't make any sense.
In post 1712, Shinobi wrote:In post 1711, pignash wrote:No, are you purposely misreading me? I was townreading the other two wagons. I was not townreading him. Flip gave town more information. I stand by my vote.
Aside from the fact that these aren't actual reasons, this isn't even what you said in the first place.
You said, AND I QUOTE:
You said your read changed - this implies a townread or, at the very least, a reason not to lynch him which was never stated or explained.
Not only did you not explain how you came to that conclusion in the first place, you ALSO said that it changed which implies that you had reason to scumread, which you've already contradicted by saying you simply "nothing'd" the slot.
In post 1731, Titus wrote:All scum, by definition, make up their scum reads. Saying reads are made up is circular.
Why is he scum?
Because his reads are made up.
Why?
Because he is scum
Circular logic.
You have to show why his reads are made up. The assertion is not enough.
In post 1733, Firebringer wrote:In post 1731, Titus wrote:All scum, by definition, make up their scum reads. Saying reads are made up is circular.
Why is he scum?
Because his reads are made up.
Why?
Because he is scum
Circular logic.
You have to show why his reads are made up. The assertion is not enough.
And you are guilty of confirmation bias all the time Titus lol.
But I will vote with you today.
VOTE: Davsto
In post 1734, Titus wrote:It's odd you think I am confbiasing but vote Dave.
In post 1735, Firebringer wrote:In post 1734, Titus wrote:It's odd you think I am confbiasing but vote Dave.
I actually think Dav is scum, but not for most of the reasons you have stated.
In post 1736, Titus wrote:What are your reasons then?
In post 1703, Grib wrote:Drixx: your catchup/reads, if you please.
In post 1731, Titus wrote:In post 1730, Shinobi wrote:In post 1725, Titus wrote:In post 1724, Shinobi wrote:Except I'm not doing that?
I pointed out the fact that he made up reasons to vote MM which has nothing to do with VCA whatsoever.
Made up is a circular reason unless you show those reasons to be untrue.
What are you talking about? This doesn't make any sense.
All scum, by definition, make up their scum reads. Saying reads are made up is circular.
Why is he scum?
Because his reads are made up.
Why?
Because he is scum
Circular logic.
You have to show why his reads are made up. The assertion is not enough.
In post 1738, Dwlee99 wrote:Eww titus votes. Gross.
In post 1712, Shinobi wrote:In post 1711, pignash wrote:No, are you purposely misreading me? I was townreading the other two wagons. I was not townreading him. Flip gave town more information. I stand by my vote.
Aside from the fact that these aren't actual reasons, this isn't even what you said in the first place.
You said, AND I QUOTE:
You said your read changed - this implies a townread or, at the very least, a reason not to lynch him which was never stated or explained.
Not only did you not explain how you came to that conclusion in the first place, you ALSO said that it changed which implies that you had reason to scumread, which you've already contradicted by saying you simply "nothing'd" the slot.
In post 1744, Nero Cain wrote:In post 1738, Dwlee99 wrote:Eww titus votes. Gross.
titus votes are better than Elyse votes.
In post 1746, Titus wrote:In post 1744, Nero Cain wrote:In post 1738, Dwlee99 wrote:Eww titus votes. Gross.
titus votes are better than Elyse votes.
Why?
In post 1748, Nero Cain wrote:In post 1746, Titus wrote:In post 1744, Nero Cain wrote:In post 1738, Dwlee99 wrote:Eww titus votes. Gross.
titus votes are better than Elyse votes.
Why?
I don't think Elyse is scum.