NY 191: Denmark Mafia - Endgame

Fro99er · Post Post #1850 (ISO) » Thu Dec 17, 2015 9:35 am

(expired on 2015-12-30 14:30:00)

(Wed Dec 30 @ 2:30:00 PM ET)

VOTECOUNT 2.02

(2)
Davsto
— Dwlee99, Firebringer
(0)
Espeonage
—
(0)
Nero Cain
—
(0)
Drixx
—
(2)
pignash
— Shinobi, Nero Cain
(0)
Firebringer
—
(0)
Shinobi
—
(0)
Grib
—
(0)
Frozen Angel
—
(0)
Shiro
—
(0)
Aj The Epic
—
(2)
Titus
— Davsto, Elyse
(5)
Elyse
— Frozen Angel, Aj The Epic, Grib, Shiro, Titus
(0)
pistachi0n
—
(0)
Heat
—
(0)
Dwlee99
—

(5)

[NOT VOTING]

— Espeonage, Drixx, pignash, pistachi0n, Heat

With

16

alive

, it takes

9

votes

to lynch.

Shinobi is V/LA

Frozen Angel · Post Post #1851 (ISO) » Thu Dec 17, 2015 9:43 am

Mod I think Pistachion and Heat need some prods

hopefully we can replace Pistachion this time!

/No Offense Pista but Your inactivity is not what we need atm

Fro99er · Post Post #1852 (ISO) » Thu Dec 17, 2015 9:46 am

In post 1851, Frozen Angel wrote:
Mod I think Pistachion and Heat need some prods

hopefully we can replace Pistachion this time!

/No Offense Pista but Your inactivity is not what we need atm

The day isn't even 72 hours old yet. No prods until 72 hours into a day phase

Frozen Angel · Post Post #1853 (ISO) » Thu Dec 17, 2015 9:49 am

ok

we w8...

Dwlee99 · Post Post #1854 (ISO) » Thu Dec 17, 2015 10:10 am

I know something you don't titus. At least I think I do..

Davsto · Post Post #1855 (ISO) » Thu Dec 17, 2015 10:28 am

In post 1841, Dwlee99 wrote:
In [url=http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/X.php?p=7481317#p7481317]post 1793[/url], Davsto wrote:I have a scumread on pistach as well. Apparently I'm scum because I don't explicitly state every single one of my reads I get from a big post. The post took a while to make, surprisingly enough, and pistach wasn't one I remembered that much because I was really fucking tired.

In [url=http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.php?p=7479430#p7479430]post 1698[/url], Dwlee99 wrote:Oh, I'm not town, dave?
Also, what is this post? Because I'm not townreading him, I get a snarky comment and a dirty look?

If you dont town read town you are scum.
the dirty look and snarcky comment are for added effect

In [url=http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.php?p=7481942#p7481942]post 1842[/url], Dwlee99 wrote:^ he lists reasons I am town in his wall in the spoiler but doesnt conclude I am town ~~

IIRC there was that one post that bugged me a little, enough for it to stand out to me to quote it. I can't get a decent townread from you.

Dwlee99 · Post Post #1856 (ISO) » Thu Dec 17, 2015 10:37 am

In post 1855, Davsto wrote:
In post 1841, Dwlee99 wrote:
In [url=http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/X.php?p=7481317#p7481317]post 1793[/url], Davsto wrote:I have a scumread on pistach as well. Apparently I'm scum because I don't explicitly state every single one of my reads I get from a big post. The post took a while to make, surprisingly enough, and pistach wasn't one I remembered that much because I was really fucking tired.

In [url=http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.php?p=7479430#p7479430]post 1698[/url], Dwlee99 wrote:Oh, I'm not town, dave?
Also, what is this post? Because I'm not townreading him, I get a snarky comment and a dirty look?

If you dont town read town you are scum.
the dirty look and snarcky comment are for added effect

In [url=http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.php?p=7481942#p7481942]post 1842[/url], Dwlee99 wrote:^ he lists reasons I am town in his wall in the spoiler but doesnt conclude I am town ~~
IIRC there was that one post that bugged me a little, enough for it to stand out to me to quote it. I can't get a decent townread from you.

Mhmmm totes.

Titus · Post Post #1857 (ISO) » Thu Dec 17, 2015 10:59 am

In post 1854, Dwlee99 wrote:I know something you don't titus. At least I think I do..

Oh really? (Skeptical Tone) Care to enlighten me?

Dwlee99 · Post Post #1858 (ISO) » Thu Dec 17, 2015 11:22 am

In post 1857, Titus wrote:
In post 1854, Dwlee99 wrote:I know something you don't titus. At least I think I do..

Oh really? (Skeptical Tone) Care to enlighten me?

It's not good to say.

Titus · Post Post #1859 (ISO) » Thu Dec 17, 2015 11:24 am

In post 1858, Dwlee99 wrote:
In post 1857, Titus wrote:
In post 1854, Dwlee99 wrote:I know something you don't titus. At least I think I do..

Oh really? (Skeptical Tone) Care to enlighten me?

It's not good to say.

Does it confirm anyone as town or scum? (Hug)

Dwlee99 · Post Post #1860 (ISO) » Thu Dec 17, 2015 12:11 pm

In post 1859, Titus wrote:
In post 1858, Dwlee99 wrote:
In post 1857, Titus wrote:
In post 1854, Dwlee99 wrote:I know something you don't titus. At least I think I do..

Oh really? (Skeptical Tone) Care to enlighten me?

It's not good to say.

Does it confirm anyone as town or scum? (Hug)

Not confirm, no.

Titus · Post Post #1861 (ISO) » Thu Dec 17, 2015 12:21 pm

Then I can be content not knowing for now. If we get townblock large enough for near certain victory, I will want you to say.

Dwlee99 · Post Post #1862 (ISO) » Thu Dec 17, 2015 12:33 pm

Titus · Post Post #1863 (ISO) » Thu Dec 17, 2015 12:34 pm

Oh to be clear, you don't have any sort of guilty on Dave correct?

pignash · Post Post #1864 (ISO) » Thu Dec 17, 2015 12:40 pm

@mod V/LA through Sunday. Busy holiday weekend, sorry guys.

Dwlee99 · Post Post #1865 (ISO) » Thu Dec 17, 2015 12:52 pm

In post 1863, Titus wrote:Oh to be clear, you don't have any sort of guilty on Dave correct?

Nope :/

Espeonage · Post Post #1866 (ISO) » Thu Dec 17, 2015 4:49 pm

Why are people treating Titus as conf town when she is quite clearly uncomfortable. Wanting to lead a town is not townie for a player that likes being in control like Titus does. In fact if anything her insistence has me on edge, if she feels the need to force it, then she is feeling like it is important for her to win, which means that she feels pressure, which given the current situation only makes sense if she is scum.

Vote: Titus

Titus · Post Post #1867 (ISO) » Thu Dec 17, 2015 5:05 pm

Hahahaha

The second sentence is a walking contradiction. :-p

Heat · Post Post #1868 (ISO) » Thu Dec 17, 2015 6:06 pm

Elyse wrote:My 1v1 has nothing to do with AJ.

Also you're calling me scum for sticking with it but saying I'd look worse if I dropped it soooo lol

I'd say that both situations make you look pretty bad, and nitpicking this part just makes you look like you're trying to find some fault in drixx's argument. pretty scummy if you ask me

Dwlee99 wrote:I know something you don't titus. At least I think I do..

What was the point of this

Elyse · Post Post #1869 (ISO) » Thu Dec 17, 2015 7:40 pm

Oh my god if I wasn't 1v1ing Titus I would be voting Heat so fast.

That was terrible.

Shiro · Post Post #1870 (ISO) » Thu Dec 17, 2015 8:17 pm

In post 1866, Espeonage wrote:Wanting to lead a town is not townie for a player that likes being in control like Titus does.

I know Titus said so already but damn. That is a big contradiction.

Jeez I dunno why someone that likes being in control would like to control and lead town.

Your whole argument falls flat cause it is flawed at its core.

Trying to a justify your vote much?

Dwlee99 · Post Post #1871 (ISO) » Fri Dec 18, 2015 12:56 am

Tunnel anyone but titus, elyse. Join the dave wagon.

Espeonage · Post Post #1872 (ISO) » Fri Dec 18, 2015 1:51 am

In post 1867, Titus wrote:Hahahaha

The second sentence is a walking contradiction. :-p

Null action is a null action is not a contradiction.

Fro99er · Post Post #1873 (ISO) » Fri Dec 18, 2015 4:31 am

In post 1864, pignash wrote:
@mod V/LA through Sunday. Busy holiday weekend, sorry guys.

got it.

Titus · Post Post #1874 (ISO) » Fri Dec 18, 2015 4:50 am

In post 1872, Espeonage wrote:
In post 1867, Titus wrote:Hahahaha

The second sentence is a walking contradiction. :-p

Null action is a null action is not a contradiction.

If my being in control is a null action, why do you state it's not townie?