Blitz 18: Wedding Invitational Mafia - GAME OVER

AngryPidgeon · Post Post #1950 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2015 8:33 am

VOTE: notscience

Because its the only viable wagon that isn't Mala at this point.

Tammy · Post Post #1951 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2015 8:40 am

In post 1381, pieguyn wrote:and yes I have thought about it and I doubt you actually are what you're softing. I think you're hoping you can backtrack out of it later without being called on it.

you can attempt to mischaracterize my posts all you want, btw, it's not going to work. not only should my role confirm me as town under the right circumstances, if you actually try and lynch me, I'll crush your face in. ~

What did you think he was softing and why did you think he could back out of it?

Tammy · Post Post #1952 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2015 8:42 am

In post 1381, pieguyn wrote:and yes I have thought about it and I doubt you actually are what you're softing. I think you're hoping you can backtrack out of it later without being called on it.

you can attempt to mischaracterize my posts all you want, btw, it's not going to work. not only should my role confirm me as town under the right circumstances, if you actually try and lynch me, I'll crush your face in. ~

Oh I thought the other part I wanted to respond to was another post.

I'd like you to talk about the crush your face in part. What did you mean by that? Were you threatening that you'd get him lynched instead?

fferyllt · Post Post #1953 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2015 8:43 am

Empire, pieguyn, Natirasha and BROseidon have been prodded.

Empire · Post Post #1954 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2015 8:48 am

Man, this prod rule is ridiculous.

I'll post after work when I'm not staring at another computer screen clicking things and drawing boxes.

AngryPidgeon · Post Post #1955 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2015 8:49 am

In post 1951, Tammy wrote:What did you think he was softing and why did you think he could back out of it?

I also want to know what you thought Mara was softing. Cause thats the weird part. It looked like you were trying to soft B/G and then Mara came in and was like oh no you don't" and you were like "are you CCing me?!?". And then claimed Bodyguard. The whole situation was just strange. It was not clear what you were softing and frankly it looked like you were softing Bride/Groom since that is the only open role in the game. I don't know how you thought Mara was CCing a bodyguard claim or that you were obviously softing that.

But then again its possible that all the confusion was just a result of general ego'ing in the thread and little concern for understanding other people's posts. On all fronts. So IDK, it might be worth revisiting again but my better sense is telling me that its going to be a wash to attempt to reread that.

AngryPidgeon · Post Post #1956 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2015 8:49 am

^ that post to Pie, obviously.

AngryPidgeon · Post Post #1957 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2015 9:01 am

Actually 1450 makes that exchange make way more sense and adds some comedic value

BROseidon · Post Post #1958 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2015 9:35 am

Oh I got prodded.

Natirasha · Post Post #1959 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2015 9:39 am

AP you feel like scum desperately trying to keep your lynch options open in the future.

BROseidon · Post Post #1960 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2015 9:41 am

In post 1925, Nachomamma8 wrote:well they're pretty crap "hey, i kinda forgot about these guys, maybe I should re-read them" reads

In post 1949, Malakittens wrote:MaLa is just really busy

MaLa can't stand that half the game is going the easy way out

And nacho enjoy your two actions next night!

This almost makes me want to not lynch mala but having 2 "I think they're scum but they'll sort themselves out" is p. dumb.

BROseidon · Post Post #1961 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2015 9:42 am

In post 1959, Natirasha wrote:AP you feel like scum desperately trying to keep your lynch options open in the future.

BROseidon · Post Post #1962 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2015 9:43 am

Okay VOTE: Natirasha

AngryPidgeon · Post Post #1963 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2015 9:51 am

In post 1959, Natirasha wrote:AP you feel like scum desperately trying to keep your lynch options open in the future.

Congratulations on identifying the hallmark of my towngame which I've historically been incapable of faking as scum.

Tammy · Post Post #1964 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2015 9:55 am

In post 1959, Natirasha wrote:AP you feel like scum desperately trying to keep your lynch options open in the future.

Is this a serious post that you just made?

ISO · Post Post #1965 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2015 10:06 am

At least read the thread

AngryPidgeon · Post Post #1966 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2015 11:11 am

Welp. Not much to see here.

I will fight anyone who says that Nati's last post is a townslip.

Natirasha · Post Post #1967 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2015 11:22 am

In post 1964, Tammy wrote:Is this a serious post that you just made?

I'm really confused what I did?

Tammy · Post Post #1968 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2015 11:31 am

Are you really suspicious of AP?

Natirasha · Post Post #1969 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2015 11:52 am

I feel like I'm missing something.

Nachomamma8 · Post Post #1970 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2015 12:07 pm

ap is the bride and or groom

Nachomamma8 · Post Post #1971 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2015 12:08 pm

I don't understand why people are voting Nati for that post.

AngryPidgeon · Post Post #1972 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2015 12:17 pm

Only one person is voting Nati for that post.

But really I dont see that one post as a pivotal reason to vote or not vote Nati. I see Nati's ISO as a great reason to vote Nati.

Natirasha · Post Post #1973 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2015 12:19 pm

In post 1970, Nachomamma8 wrote:ap is the bride and or groom

I see.

BROseidon · Post Post #1974 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2015 12:23 pm

In post 1972, AngryPidgeon wrote:Only one person is voting Nati for that post.

But really I dont see that one post as a pivotal reason to vote or not vote Nati. I see Nati's ISO as a great reason to vote Nati.

I think it's indicative of someone who's blatantly not reading the thread.