Blitz 18: Wedding Invitational Mafia - GAME OVER

AngryPidgeon · Post Post #1975 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2015 12:33 pm

^ I was concerned that it was faking as much for town cred. Because scum would -have- to be aware of whats going on to some extent.

Nachomamma8 · Post Post #1976 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2015 12:34 pm

In post 1972, AngryPidgeon wrote:Only one person is voting Nati for that post.

But really I dont see that one post as a pivotal reason to vote or not vote Nati. I see Nati's ISO as a great reason to vote Nati.

i was passive aggressively digging at bro with that

why is nati's iso scummy?

Nachomamma8 · Post Post #1977 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2015 12:34 pm

In post 1974, BROseidon wrote:
In post 1972, AngryPidgeon wrote:Only one person is voting Nati for that post.

But really I dont see that one post as a pivotal reason to vote or not vote Nati. I see Nati's ISO as a great reason to vote Nati.

I think it's indicative of someone who's blatantly not reading the thread.

and why is this worthy of a vote?

BROseidon · Post Post #1978 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2015 12:37 pm

In post 1977, Nachomamma8 wrote:
In post 1974, BROseidon wrote:
In post 1972, AngryPidgeon wrote:Only one person is voting Nati for that post.

But really I dont see that one post as a pivotal reason to vote or not vote Nati. I see Nati's ISO as a great reason to vote Nati.

I think it's indicative of someone who's blatantly not reading the thread.

and why is this worthy of a vote?

b/c my limited experience with scum-nati involved a lot of her not reading the thread.

Tammy · Post Post #1979 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2015 12:37 pm

Right but goodmorning didn't. She showed no indication she realized what mara had been softing since her earliest posts. But then again neither did Mala or pie.

Goodmorning not seeming to recognize maras softing is why I don't think bros assertion that they got something for killing one of the couple is true because you'd think at the very least you'd pick up on that if you were looking for it.

Nachomamma8 · Post Post #1980 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2015 12:41 pm

In post 1978, BROseidon wrote:
In post 1977, Nachomamma8 wrote:
In post 1974, BROseidon wrote:
In post 1972, AngryPidgeon wrote:Only one person is voting Nati for that post.

But really I dont see that one post as a pivotal reason to vote or not vote Nati. I see Nati's ISO as a great reason to vote Nati.

I think it's indicative of someone who's blatantly not reading the thread.

and why is this worthy of a vote?

b/c my limited experience with scum-nati involved a lot of her not reading the thread.

limited is right, then

AngryPidgeon · Post Post #1981 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2015 12:43 pm

In post 1978, BROseidon wrote:b/c my limited experience with scum-nati involved a lot of her not reading the thread.

You were in that Street Racers, weren't you? As a hydra with PA? The one where Nati fakeclaimed being a gunsmith or something?

BROseidon · Post Post #1982 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2015 12:49 pm

In post 1981, AngryPidgeon wrote:
In post 1978, BROseidon wrote:b/c my limited experience with scum-nati involved a lot of her not reading the thread.

You were in that Street Racers, weren't you? As a hydra with PA? The one where Nati fakeclaimed being a gunsmith or something?

Yes. I'm the asshole who did like half the work that game.

Natirasha · Post Post #1983 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2015 12:55 pm

In post 1974, BROseidon wrote:
I think it's indicative of someone who's blatantly not reading the thread.

Silly BRO, I

never

read the thread.

Empire · Post Post #1984 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2015 1:17 pm

Meh, I don't think Nati is scum for that post (although it did make me lol) and the stuff with GM makes me think she's more likely town anyway.

pieguyn · Post Post #1985 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2015 1:27 pm

I spent all of today catching up on sleep. will post tonight, or if not, tomorrow.

fferyllt · Post Post #1986 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2015 2:13 pm

notscience has been prodded.

notscience · Post Post #1987 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2015 5:37 pm

In post 1935, Nachomamma8 wrote:wow good reads
weren't you scum reading mala yesterday? and now... you're not?

I'm very clearly scum with her and I'm scared to commit a read because I'm so sure you'll lynch me right after so I think avoiding this question is the best way to survive!

Ms Marangal · Post Post #1988 (ISO) » Mon Dec 21, 2015 7:18 pm

Dodge

New job tomorrow, wheeeee

Empire · Post Post #1989 (ISO) » Tue Dec 22, 2015 12:21 am

Prod dodging, since I won't be able to post until after work.

Tammy · Post Post #1990 (ISO) » Tue Dec 22, 2015 4:09 am

Okay this setup is bananas. If we believe everyone so far we've got:

cabd
penguin - two ic lovers

miller
tracker
kill cop
bodyguard
bodyguard
motivator

against a rolecop
roleblocker
???

no one else has indicated any roles.

IDK I'll probably vote mala because that makes the most sense. If she is an actual motivator then Nacho or Pie might be lying.

ISO · Post Post #1991 (ISO) » Tue Dec 22, 2015 4:19 am

did we ever get flavor from bro

Tammy · Post Post #1992 (ISO) » Tue Dec 22, 2015 4:27 am

I don't think so

BROseidon · Post Post #1993 (ISO) » Tue Dec 22, 2015 4:31 am

In post 156, BROseidon wrote:
In post 114, AngryPidgeon wrote:BRO should flavor claim if he hasnt.

I'm father of the groom. The role pm is pretty funny, too!

#readingisfundamental

ISO · Post Post #1994 (ISO) » Tue Dec 22, 2015 6:38 am

i guess i was hoping for why that makes you a miller, im sure anyone could explain why their own father should be a miller but stil

Malakittens · Post Post #1995 (ISO) » Tue Dec 22, 2015 7:12 am

Well i was going to make an OUAT joke, but it doesn't work. Carry on.

BROseidon · Post Post #1996 (ISO) » Tue Dec 22, 2015 7:17 am

In post 1994, Cephrir wrote:i guess i was hoping for why that makes you a miller, im sure anyone could explain why their own father should be a miller but stil

It's because Cabd's dad is a bigoted, angry man

AngryPidgeon · Post Post #1997 (ISO) » Tue Dec 22, 2015 7:33 am

I don't want to do this characterization misjustice, but from what I recall:

Cabd's dad is extremely conservative, fairly racist/sexist, and rather unpleasant. So basically what BRO just said. I actually thought that he could be a Mafia role in the game, but it looks like the Mafia flavor is literal demons so that wouldn't make sense. Doesn't mean that it couldn't be provided to the scumteam as a fakeclaim though, -shrug-.

ISO · Post Post #1998 (ISO) » Tue Dec 22, 2015 7:40 am

Yeah, I'm peripherally aware of that.

AngryPidgeon · Post Post #1999 (ISO) » Tue Dec 22, 2015 7:48 am

In post 869, Natirasha wrote:VOTE: GOODMORNING

Sorry I haven't really paid attention and still won't til tomorrow afternoon, but deadline.

This is the first time Nati addresses GM aside from an awkward post to Pieguy in which Nati mentions awkwardly that she would lynch GM but maybe not Mala/Mara. The progression is pretty hollow to me and yes I realize that might just be because Nati isn't reading or doing much participating but thats a pretty poor excuse for town.

The whole bit about Bride/Groom claiming looks awkward as well. Nati is showing a lot of interest in them with setup spec out the gate and then following through on the original idea that they should claim on D2.

In post 1159, Natirasha wrote:Who cares if they are lovers.

It makes this post read weird to me since Nati is devoting most of her content to the Bride/Groom spec. Yet she doesn't actually care about a detail that might be very important to them claiming or her game spec?

90% of Nati's reads are just carelessly suggesting that GM is scummy and not talking about much else. Thinks Mala is town but won't do anything about that other than vote NotScience and be snooty to Nacho for asking about why Nati would vote NS over Mala. And if anyone read Nati's ISO, it'd be clear that she was going to do just that Today barring some actual ...something.

I'm just not seeing why this is town to so many people cause I'm not seeing anything in the ISO that makes me want to townread her.