In post 71, Kaboose wrote:Am I wrong in thinking things move faster in this game? That's why I'm not seeing it as weird. We need to have wagons.
Quit calling stuff weird and odd if you're not going to explain why you think it's that. You're just waiting for people to come agree with your vagueness and do the work for you.
No. I am just pointing out that something is fishy about this. You seem to awfully comfortable with this situation, though. Which is also weird.
In post 80, Kaboose wrote:If any of you have played with me, you'd probably understand why I'm comfortable being a top lynch candidate on D1...
In post 97, Kaboose wrote:I've been called scum for being defensive and I'm at L2, my bad everyone. I guess I'll just assume you all are pulling my leg and 5 people don't want me lynched..
Wut? You do realize not every vote is "lynch now please" right?
In post 84, Anxiety Attack wrote:What you did is not technically buddying. However, you immediately townreading Umlat for that looks a lot closer to buddying. Why the townread on Ranger? Ranger kind of did a similar play to that in the last game she played but I wouldn't call it town so much as typical but I haven't seen a scumgame of hers and maybe ika can help with that.
Our first post in this thread was pignash, the rest have been me. I don't really care if me townreading Umlat looks like buddying because I outlined my reasons for the read. Why didn't you analyze the reason I provided instead of ignoring them and labeling it buddying?
I was townreading Ranger because her reads list seemed to invite a lot of discussion around it and I find not explaining a reads list like that pretty "I don't care what you think" which isn't scum behavior. Yeah it's pretty weak but it's there.
In post 85, Anxiety Attack wrote:Yakko looks town so far. Not sure on pisskop but I've played with him enough I should be able to figure it out relatively quickly.
The things you decided to comment on seemed cookie cutter and safe at the time (referring to 87, 88, and 89). However when I actually decided to catch up myself there wasn't a lot to comment on so I felt better about it.
Yakko is mostly gut. I feel like his early question about AI seemed really filler and idk what was going to be gained from that. Like it looked like he wanted it to be perceived as his attempt to get out of RVS when the question itself serves no purpose.
In post 84, Anxiety Attack wrote:What you did is not technically buddying. However, you immediately townreading Umlat for that looks a lot closer to buddying. Why the townread on Ranger? Ranger kind of did a similar play to that in the last game she played but I wouldn't call it town so much as typical but I haven't seen a scumgame of hers and maybe ika can help with that.
Our first post in this thread was pignash, the rest have been me. I don't really care if me townreading Umlat looks like buddying because I outlined my reasons for the read. Why didn't you analyze the reason I provided instead of ignoring them and labeling it buddying?
I was townreading Ranger because her reads list seemed to invite a lot of discussion around it and I find not explaining a reads list like that pretty "I don't care what you think" which isn't scum behavior. Yeah it's pretty weak but it's there.
Your reason for the townread looked weak to me and kind of appeasy but in the beginning, got to push something so I get that. I am going to meta Ranger some. She did a reads list like that in this game off of RVS only http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=110&t=64575 so I'll see if she normally does that or ask ika about her scumgame.
In post 85, Anxiety Attack wrote:Yakko looks town so far. Not sure on pisskop but I've played with him enough I should be able to figure it out relatively quickly.
~SW
Why Yakko town?
Just got out of a game with Yakko where he was pretty town. 40 kind of looked like a townish response to trying to push discussion. Is this the post you are talking about in 113?
