In post 378, Aeronaut wrote:Ok, going a little at a time, because there's too many pages and too little of an attention span.
In post 246, MattP wrote: In post 243, Garmr wrote: In post 242, Dwlee99 wrote: In post 241, Garmr wrote: In post 240, Dwlee99 wrote:I am liking Aero and Dier for town atm. Taly is leaning town, too.
Personally I don't like that matt p dropped a soft claim to doctor earlier considering there probably isn't a doctor in this game.
Wasn't he referring to his avatar?
It felt like he was laying down a fake claim for latter.
I officially think you're bad at mafia
Congrats!
Garmr is actually pretty good at this game, he just gets to where he's going in a different way than most.
In post 262, Garmr wrote:@Frozen angel and anyone else looking at matt as scum
-Mattp is scum
and I'm glad how you picked up on matts role drop wifom and got a similar thought process than mine.
All the things he quoted in 255.
His trying to say he was trying to bring us out of rvs with his question.
What
about
the things he quoted in 255 are bad? Like, you didn't respond to them, which is whatever, but you can't point to them and say they're scummy if you yourself wouldn't comment on them. Explain what's bad about them.
In post 280, iraonavp wrote:In general, I think it is best not to mention real or imagined softclaims in the thread.
Unless you think they're bullshit, then it's fine. In my opinion, anyway.
In post 283, Garmr wrote:
Hey your just now starting to see why matt is scum god your slow. If matt isn't lynched today and his scum it will be all your fault. I changed my mind you can be town.
Ok Garmr, tell me succinctly; why I should be voting mattP, and like a few of your main points on him right now.
To be honest, reading the fight between you and Matt is migrant-inducing, so I need something easier to swallow in order for me to follow along, here.
Ok
with 255 I felt that I answered a majority before or they aren't even relevant to my case. Posting stuff that isn't relevant and side stepping is dodging and is scummy. The problem was with what he was doing sure his saying that it wouldn't effect the game negatively but the point was instead of justifying a reason to ask why he went and played it down as a action that can't hurt instead of one with actual town motive. That in itself is scummy. His original passive response is the problem and how long it actually took for him to actually think up a answer which shows that he made that up and it wasn't his original intention.
quick summary doesn't cover my whole case presented so far but some of it.
-his initial reaction to being questioned and downplay himself it was like he was caught and didn't know how to react.
-His passiveness which turned into aggressiveness once the pressure was off. This means other peoples views influence his behavior which is generally a scummy thing to do. Other behavior show that he is influenced by other people instead of trying to catch scum.
-New one he never has contributed anything to any wagon he is on. He says something like oh you took the easiest path or pretty much no reason at other than saying "I don't like deir."
-The trust me I'm a dr looked deliberate. Seemed like an attempt to bait a reaction out.
-claims that i'm rolefishing ect Has made implied suggestions that my actions are scummy yet town reads me in various bits. Like his trying to push me off him with hidden threats.
-My gut plus a couple other things I am watching him for.
-Brought up by someone else but something I agree on. The fact once I said no I wouldn't answer them he calmly accepted it instead of asking why.