Open 622 - Stack the Deck (Game Over)


User avatar
shaddowez
shaddowez
He/Him
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
shaddowez
He/Him
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2604
Joined: May 28, 2014
Pronoun: He/Him

Post Post #150 (ISO) » Wed Jan 06, 2016 5:16 am

Post by shaddowez »

VC 1.4
Lowell
[L-3]
- Armageddon, SnarkySnowman, Persivul, Ricastle
SnarkySnowman
- Random Canadian, Gendaberry, Karnage
Karnage
- MarioManiac4
MarioManiac4
- jmo16mla
Ricastle
- Lowell

Not voting:
Vedith, Kop

With 12 alive, it's 7 to lynch.

Deadline is in (expired on 2016-01-18 11:30:00)


Mod Notes
: Random Canadian did not pick up his prod, looking for a replacement.
Armageddon will be V/LA until Thursday 1/7
V/LA on Weekends
User avatar
Persivul
Persivul
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Persivul
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 10042
Joined: May 4, 2015

Post Post #151 (ISO) » Wed Jan 06, 2016 5:17 am

Post by Persivul »

In post 149, Lowell wrote:Is this better? I didn't realize snarky had so many defenders!

Actually I'm not crazy about either one of you.

Your post calling for a quick lynch feels like scum who just can't relax. This game is moving slowly but there's still 12 days left in phase. Town shouldn't feel any sense of urgency.
User avatar
SnarkySnowman
SnarkySnowman
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
SnarkySnowman
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3597
Joined: November 24, 2015
Location: Boston, MA

Post Post #152 (ISO) » Wed Jan 06, 2016 5:33 am

Post by SnarkySnowman »

In post 149, Lowell wrote:UNVOTE: snarky
VOTE: ricastle

Is this better? I didn't realize snarky had so many defenders!

This is probably the second worst post of the game.
User avatar
Lowell
Lowell
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Lowell
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6318
Joined: July 25, 2006

Post Post #153 (ISO) » Wed Jan 06, 2016 6:16 am

Post by Lowell »

And I'm just getting started!

BTW I don't actually buy that any of you think I'm scum; you're just trying to make a point.

If you're scum trying to jump on me for "OMG bad post LOL" that's fine. But if you're town, you have no excuses. You won't get absolved later on by saying "Ugh, well, it's his own fault for playing badly."
User avatar
Ricastle
Ricastle
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Ricastle
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2476
Joined: March 31, 2015

Post Post #154 (ISO) » Wed Jan 06, 2016 7:57 am

Post by Ricastle »

Was that Snarky vote post a reaction test in any way? Because otherwise it's you who has no excuse.

Why are you acting so apathetic towards me considering you have made out that you are almost certain I am scum? I mean, you're practically treating me as an equal among the others voting you now. No attempt to single me out. And your post is written in a way that makes it seem as if you know that logically it should work as a deterrent to the entire wagon.
User avatar
Lowell
Lowell
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Lowell
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6318
Joined: July 25, 2006

Post Post #155 (ISO) » Wed Jan 06, 2016 8:20 am

Post by Lowell »

Is this a serious question? I'm obviously not "certain" anyone is scum. I think you are, but I'd obviously vote for others as well. And it's not a "reaction test," per se, in that I'm not trying to catch anyone in particular. Truthfully, no one is doing anything, I'm bored, and feel like stirring the pot. Sitting around waiting to be "sure" of something is pointless, and never going to happen.
User avatar
Persivul
Persivul
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Persivul
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 10042
Joined: May 4, 2015

Post Post #156 (ISO) » Wed Jan 06, 2016 8:30 am

Post by Persivul »

In post 153, Lowell wrote:But if you're town, you have no excuses. You won't get absolved later on by saying "Ugh, well, it's his own fault for playing badly."

Fear mongering.
User avatar
Kop
Kop
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Kop
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2433
Joined: December 24, 2013

Post Post #157 (ISO) » Wed Jan 06, 2016 8:52 am

Post by Kop »

In post 151, Persivul wrote:
In post 149, Lowell wrote:Is this better? I didn't realize snarky had so many defenders!

Actually I'm not crazy about either one of you.

Your post calling for a quick lynch feels like scum who just can't relax. This game is moving slowly but there's still 12 days left in phase. Town shouldn't feel any sense of urgency.


I agree with this.

Game is going slow, but everything in RL should returning back to some sort of normality so things should pick up.

@Lowell

I understand that you want this game to go quicker, but your post is giving me the impression that your trying to appear to be pro town, and look like your doing something.
You'll Never Walk Alone!
User avatar
Ricastle
Ricastle
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Ricastle
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2476
Joined: March 31, 2015

Post Post #158 (ISO) » Wed Jan 06, 2016 10:21 am

Post by Ricastle »

Was your Snarky vote serious on any level?

Also, this
In post 144, Lowell wrote:ricastle (who is sad that I caught him so easily)
sounds, at worst, quite confident to me.
User avatar
Lowell
Lowell
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Lowell
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6318
Joined: July 25, 2006

Post Post #159 (ISO) » Wed Jan 06, 2016 11:57 am

Post by Lowell »

@Kop-
I am indeed trying to look pro-town and like I'm doing something.

@Ricastle-
Um, kind of serious? I would vote for snarky, sure. He's mostly null to me, but why not? He could easily be scum.
User avatar
Ricastle
Ricastle
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Ricastle
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2476
Joined: March 31, 2015

Post Post #160 (ISO) » Wed Jan 06, 2016 12:29 pm

Post by Ricastle »

So why in the blue hell did you put aside your scumread on me to bandwagon a nullread - what's more, with me being said wagon's leader! Makes no sense at all.
User avatar
Karnage
Karnage
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Karnage
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3175
Joined: April 8, 2012
Location: UTC -5 hours

Post Post #161 (ISO) » Wed Jan 06, 2016 2:09 pm

Post by Karnage »

In post 145, SnarkySnowman wrote:Aight, Ricastle earlier didn't seem very town motivated. This definitely isn't town motivated.

VOTE: Lowell

And really we do need more activity.

UNVOTE: snarkysnowman this post feels very townish to me
Lowell wrote:This game is dying. Let's quicklynch someone.

UNVOTE: whoever I'm voting
VOTE: snarky

I don't fully see the case here, but I don't
not
see the case. As good as anything. I'll also accept ricastle (who is sad that I caught him so easily) or Armageddon (who asks silly questions to look like he's participating.

LYNCH!

Lowell wrote:@Kop-
I am indeed trying to look pro-town and like I'm doing something.

@Ricastle-
Um, kind of serious? I would vote for snarky, sure. He's mostly null to me, but why not? He could easily be scum.

So ricastle and armageddon are your top scum reads but you are ok with lynching a null read? Do you have strong town reads on anybody? Who wouldn't you consider voting for?
User avatar
Lowell
Lowell
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Lowell
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6318
Joined: July 25, 2006

Post Post #162 (ISO) » Wed Jan 06, 2016 5:22 pm

Post by Lowell »

In post 160, Ricastle wrote:So why in the blue hell did you put aside your scumread on me to bandwagon a nullread - what's more, with me being said wagon's leader! Makes no sense at all.


Because I'm not that sure. Maybe 50% you're scum, I guess? 40% for snarky, or something like that? Either way the difference is marginal enough that there's more value in just trying to kill anyone.

Everyone plays this game like "oh, I'm sure X or Y are scum, I'll only lynch them," even though no one actually knows. Boring. Just kill someone. My scum reads are ris and karnage (you really thought 145 was a good post?). I won't lynch kop (obviously) or persivul (at least today). But I'll kill anyone else.
User avatar
jmo16mla
jmo16mla
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
jmo16mla
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 5335
Joined: September 24, 2012
Location: Louisiana

Post Post #163 (ISO) » Wed Jan 06, 2016 7:50 pm

Post by jmo16mla »

In post 149, Lowell wrote:UNVOTE: snarky
VOTE: ricastle

Is this better? I didn't realize snarky had so many defenders!

this is terrible:(
town: 15:13 Scum 4:4
User avatar
jmo16mla
jmo16mla
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
jmo16mla
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 5335
Joined: September 24, 2012
Location: Louisiana

Post Post #164 (ISO) » Wed Jan 06, 2016 7:51 pm

Post by jmo16mla »

In post 152, SnarkySnowman wrote:
In post 149, Lowell wrote:UNVOTE: snarky
VOTE: ricastle

Is this better? I didn't realize snarky had so many defenders!

This is probably the second worst post of the game.

exactly who are you reading scum right now besides lowell.
town: 15:13 Scum 4:4
User avatar
jmo16mla
jmo16mla
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
jmo16mla
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 5335
Joined: September 24, 2012
Location: Louisiana

Post Post #165 (ISO) » Wed Jan 06, 2016 7:55 pm

Post by jmo16mla »

In post 157, Kop wrote:@Lowell

I understand that you want this game to go quicker, but your post is giving me the impression that your trying to appear to be pro town, and look like your doing something.

say something you havent heard before. I know its hard to play being confirmed town and not have to prove anything to anyone, but please try to help us out a little more because youre dead tonight.
town: 15:13 Scum 4:4
User avatar
jmo16mla
jmo16mla
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
jmo16mla
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 5335
Joined: September 24, 2012
Location: Louisiana

Post Post #166 (ISO) » Wed Jan 06, 2016 7:57 pm

Post by jmo16mla »

In post 161, Karnage wrote:UNVOTE: snarkysnowman this post feels very townish to me

noted.
town: 15:13 Scum 4:4
User avatar
MarioManiac4
MarioManiac4
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
MarioManiac4
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 9179
Joined: May 1, 2015

Post Post #167 (ISO) » Wed Jan 06, 2016 8:50 pm

Post by MarioManiac4 »

In post 161, Karnage wrote:
In post 145, SnarkySnowman wrote:Aight, Ricastle earlier didn't seem very town motivated. This definitely isn't town motivated.

VOTE: Lowell

And really we do need more activity.

UNVOTE: snarkysnowman this post feels very townish to me
Lowell wrote:This game is dying. Let's quicklynch someone.

UNVOTE: whoever I'm voting
VOTE: snarky

I don't fully see the case here, but I don't
not
see the case. As good as anything. I'll also accept ricastle (who is sad that I caught him so easily) or Armageddon (who asks silly questions to look like he's participating.

LYNCH!

Lowell wrote:@Kop-
I am indeed trying to look pro-town and like I'm doing something.

@Ricastle-
Um, kind of serious? I would vote for snarky, sure. He's mostly null to me, but why not? He could easily be scum.

So ricastle and armageddon are your top scum reads but you are ok with lynching a null read? Do you have strong town reads on anybody? Who wouldn't you consider voting for?

Hello, why do your reads suddenly shift to the focus of pressure?
User avatar
jmo16mla
jmo16mla
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
jmo16mla
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 5335
Joined: September 24, 2012
Location: Louisiana

Post Post #168 (ISO) » Wed Jan 06, 2016 8:51 pm

Post by jmo16mla »

lol did you see his quick unvote after a null post of snarky? i literally lol'd.
town: 15:13 Scum 4:4
User avatar
jmo16mla
jmo16mla
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
jmo16mla
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 5335
Joined: September 24, 2012
Location: Louisiana

Post Post #169 (ISO) » Wed Jan 06, 2016 8:51 pm

Post by jmo16mla »

soft buss there.
town: 15:13 Scum 4:4
User avatar
jmo16mla
jmo16mla
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
jmo16mla
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 5335
Joined: September 24, 2012
Location: Louisiana

Post Post #170 (ISO) » Wed Jan 06, 2016 8:52 pm

Post by jmo16mla »

UNVOTE: mario
town: 15:13 Scum 4:4
User avatar
Gendaberry
Gendaberry
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Gendaberry
Goon
Goon
Posts: 287
Joined: October 22, 2014

Post Post #171 (ISO) » Wed Jan 06, 2016 9:57 pm

Post by Gendaberry »

In post 162, Lowell wrote:

My scum reads are ris and karnage (you really thought 145 was a good post?). I won't lynch kop (obviously) or persivul (at least today). But I'll kill anyone else.


In #144 you said that you'd be fine with an Armageddon lynch, so I'm assuming you were scumreading him? Where did that go? He hasn't exactly posted anything recently that could've changed your mind.
User avatar
Gendaberry
Gendaberry
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Gendaberry
Goon
Goon
Posts: 287
Joined: October 22, 2014

Post Post #172 (ISO) » Wed Jan 06, 2016 10:10 pm

Post by Gendaberry »

VOTE: Karnage

I'm with Mario on this one. It feels like he's just been sheeping popular town sentiment in an effort to hide or seem useful. At the very least, It'd be nice to know what his scumreads are since after unvoting Snarky, it doesn't really seem like he has any.

I'd be down for Lowell or Snarky, but personally Karnage seems more likely to be scum at this point.
User avatar
Zulfy
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Zulfy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3899
Joined: October 3, 2015

Post Post #173 (ISO) » Thu Jan 07, 2016 2:17 am

Post by Zulfy »

Draft dodge

Will for real contribute later today
User avatar
Lowell
Lowell
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Lowell
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6318
Joined: July 25, 2006

Post Post #174 (ISO) » Thu Jan 07, 2016 3:26 am

Post by Lowell »

In post 171, Gendaberry wrote:
In post 162, Lowell wrote:

My scum reads are ris and karnage (you really thought 145 was a good post?). I won't lynch kop (obviously) or persivul (at least today). But I'll kill anyone else.


In #144 you said that you'd be fine with an Armageddon lynch, so I'm assuming you were scumreading him? Where did that go? He hasn't exactly posted anything recently that could've changed your mind.


Yeah I forgot about him. Happy to lynch Armageddon, too. As I said I think more in terms of who I
won't
lynch than who I will.

Return to “Completed Open Games”