Rc this is not only about me. your not playing like YOU.
what are your reads so far?
I don't really have any :\
In post 352, Kraeg wrote:Ranger[4] - Persivul, Frozen Angel, lane0168, Jackal711
Wednesday_[3] - Smithereens, BlackStar, Flubbernugget
Almost50[2] - Ranger, davesaz
davesaz[1] - Starbuck
Frozen Angel[1] - Wednesday_
Persivul[1] - RadiantCowbells
Not voting: Almost50
In post 355, Smithereens wrote:@FA, are you so confident about the Link between Wednesday and the other guy that you're prepared to kill him...?
...So?Persivul wrote:Masons aren't in the setup.
Or, you know.And yeah, if it's a slip it's a classic.
This is scum opportunism at its finest, btw.RadiantCowbells wrote:VOTE: Ranger
Interesting.
Or, you know, we could skip the part where we lynch town, then go, "oh, guess that means the other's scum, let's lynch them" and lynch aPersivul wrote:If both of you were joking, it was a stupid joke. We have to lynch one of you to find out. Since Ranger also claimed Miller, she's the best choice. If she flips green, you get read on your own merits going forward.
You can be forgiven because you weren't in Blitz 2.Persivul wrote:If someone refers to me as their mason partner and I'm not, I don't care if I think it was intended as a joke - I wouldn't go along with it.
Oh, I don't know, maybe Wednesday actuallyHow do you know that, since you're not masons?
SincePersivul wrote:Also consider that Ranger is one of the most serious players on here.
...Which should have made it even more obvious that, yes, it was joke.lane wrote:And yeah I forgot about the miller claim.
Sure it does! It leaves unexplained the immediate townread entirely. Nope, not like I explained it or anything.Persivul wrote:But if it was a joke, it STILL leaves unexplained the immediate strong townreads on each other.
In post 363, Ranger wrote:...Which should have made it even more obvious that, yes, it was joke.
In post 363, Ranger wrote:...Wait. (Also, 172. You know that I cannot be a Werewolf, and you know that Wednesday cannot be a Mafia Jailkeeper, and we're both unlikely to have drawn a second werewolf/mafia card.)
Yes, because I've made it a personal goal to be in every Blitz game. I've been incredibly frustrated I've missed as many as I had. I also knew what I was getting into, a game with no town, thus, I knew that no matter what I could not be town.Flubbernugget wrote:Didn't you join a lawless game in blitz?
On the contrary, I am a frequent early nightkill as town.Weak powers for the sake of being town don't seem like a choice up your alley
It's actually given me a lot already.Flubbernugget wrote:How will that factor into your discard scumhunting?
In post 366, Ranger wrote:But as my discard shows...I'm not a Werewolf, so I clearly hold at least SOME reason not to be that type of role.
Literally every post by Almost50 is claiming scum.Frozen Angel wrote:Ranger never stated why is he scumreading baka.
Exactly.Smithereens wrote:Imo scum are generally greedy capitalistic pigs who jump like jews at the sign of profit. The 'slip' was clearly a situation that could be capitalised on, ergo the push.
Because Wednesday is my mason partner, duh.Frozen Angel wrote:Why?
It is. But why would I claim mason-miller?Frozen Angel wrote:miller was or wasn't your modifier ?
Wednesday, immediately out of the gate, produced strong reads in 67. It takes a lister to know a lister. I do listing. I know how it works and when it's town and when it's not. Wednesday's listing was immediately obvious to me: townreading me for all the effort I put into one post, townreading Smithereens's entrance which I did too, lots of reads I understood...in fact, every read there that was an actual read, I agreed with: Persivul trying to blend in was something I noticed and thought him scum for, with all the townreads Wednesday listed being townreads of my own, too.Frozen Angel wrote:why should I town read wednesday?
In post 362, Ranger wrote:
Or, you know, we could skip the part where we lynch town, then go, "oh, guess that means the other's scum, let's lynch them" and lynch aPersivul wrote:If both of you were joking, it was a stupid joke. We have to lynch one of you to find out. Since Ranger also claimed Miller, she's the best choice. If she flips green, you get read on your own merits going forward.secondtown, too.
Which is totally what will happen the moment you lynch me, since I'm the main defender of Wednesday.
And instead. Lynch Almost50, where we actually hadmomentumbuilding, before you decided to go all stupid on us and take avery obvious jokeat face value.
Seriously, do you think I would claim mason, under no pressure, with it being a serious claim, on D1? Who DOES that? It was a joke. The "duh" at the end should have said as much.
Theonlyacceptable action when someone claims they're your mason buddy and you aren't is to accept it. Town, scum, doesn't matter. Joke, gambit, it doesn't matter.
Oh, I don't know, maybe Wednesday actuallyHow do you know that, since you're not masons?
In post 363, Ranger wrote:Since when?
I'm notorious for fluffing around backon my home site. Have to do SOMETHING when I'm not analyzing, after all.
In post 369, Ranger wrote:Wednesday, immediately out of the gate, produced strong reads in 67. It takes a lister to know a lister. I do listing. I know how it works and when it's town and when it's not. Wednesday's listing was immediately obvious to me: townreading me for all the effort I put into one post,
In post 358, Smithereens wrote:Imo scum are generally greedy capitalistic pigs who jump like jews at the sign of profit.