In post 474, Almost50 wrote:OK... too much info at once, but here is my response:
@Wednesday: PI only investigates CULT. So, maybe she's not cult and there's a very small chance she could be a WW. What about Mafia? How would you clear her from being Mafia??
Also, I looked up modifiers, and if she was given "Athiest" then she would investigate as NO CULT regardless, so .. ??
All this is assuming your modifier is DAY to begin with. Otherwise, there's nothing you could've investigated either, or am I totally lost?
Also, why would she choose Ranger to investigate so early in phase...
Wednesday's crumb / soft / wink can be read multiple ways. Frozen jumping on it is townish, votes piling on for that reason is questionable. Refusal to fullclaim doesn't bother me.
I immediately got "joke" on reading the mason post and reply. I expect there to be some opportunism in the responses to it.
Almost50 is redeemed in my eyes, getting a town read there now. UNVOTE:
Wanna play Minecraft with your ms friends? Check out the minecraft thread, or the channel on discord
In post 418, Almost50 wrote:The thng about Starbuck is the main issue I have on this site. People here tend to overlook/ignore the silent ones. Does it not strike you as a little suspicious that someone only posted twice in more than 48 hours? More so when it's a blitz game with only 96 hours day phase??
NM above, you already answered. Yes, I've argued in the past that conceptually lurkers should be policy lynched in some percentage of games, but you know damn well that doesn't happen. So, why bring it up?
In post 262, lane0168 wrote:How is that clearly a town statement? Even if it's a joke, it couldn't be a scum joke?
In post 268, lane0168 wrote:Wednesday doesn't seem to be brushing it off as a joke. Seems more like scrambling to cover up the slip. I wish persivul would've played it out more to see if they stuck with the claim. Tough to decide what it really is
In post 285, lane0168 wrote:Hmm it might be better to vote Wednesday here. If we're wrong, Wednesday could just be trying to set himself for the "see! I told you he was town you idiots" whIle still being scum.
Really don't know why he refuses to tell us why ranger is unquestionably town. Is there a role that gets a pregame role investigation or some shit?
In post 293, lane0168 wrote:But seriously, if we're lynching one of them, can we make it Wednesday? The reaction makes him the more scummy one if you all me
In post 296, Wednesday_ wrote:You sound like you got her to -1... Which is not the case and wont be the case.
My reaction was appropriate in response to sillyness.
@lane do it pussy. You wont.
Your reaction wasnt and still isn't an appropriate response to sillyness. Which tells me it's not sillyness at all. I won't what? You some sort of tough guy? Why don't you tell us why ranger is town? Pussy
Either RC is playing to confirmation bias or he really is being opportunistic. Also, Persivul throwing casual scum claims around on page 17 didn't go unnoticed. For now:
