Blitz 16: Blitz Greatest Idea Mafia(GAME OVER)

[Smithereens]

Well..

UNVOTE:

VOTE: Persivul

[Smithereens]

It's a rather slow Blitz match imo.. T.T

[BlackStar]

It's a rather slow Blitz match imo.. T.T

People might be busy

[Persivul]

Also, Persivul throwing casual scum claims around on page 17 didn't go unnoticed.

I reviewed page 17 and saw that I was pressuring Almost50, who I made a case on way back in 195. No clue what you mean by throwing casual scum claims around...although that's what you seem to be doing here, by making the claim without mentioning any specifics.

[Ranger]

UNVOTE: Almost50
VOTE: Starbuck.
Vote may change (RadiantCowbells or Persivul in particular), but I'm thinking I was wrong on Almost50, and that Almost50 is town now.
Not absolutely sure, but enough where I'm not comfortable voting there anymore.

[Ranger]

How you know Ranger is town?

I'm almost positive Wednesday has played with me before, and may even be someone who I've gotten very close to in my time playing here on mafiascum.net. I could be wrong about the closeness part, but there's no way this is Wednesday's first game with me. This should be fairly obvious. I could state ideas, but I hold no interest in revealing an alt's main. Instead, I'd judge off of the content Wednesday has given, from which town is the only conclusion to be made.

I would like to hear it

I don't have all the information yet, and if I reveal, then all hope of getting that extra information is lost. In particular, Starbuck, though I'd also prefer Wednesday do so as well as you. You said you got two scum cards, but what was your actual one? (Technically, Wednesday hasn't said either, but it doesn't matter. I need one or two more, but I don't need all 13.)

If Wednesday really is town there's no way in FUCK anyone would trust their reads

No way

Exactly my point!
Which is why lynching Wednesday (or me) would be bad, because the townread on the other would be discarded.

[Ranger]

There is absolutely no town motivation to choose being lynched over claiming.

There is also no scum motivation to choose being lynched over making a fakeclaim that could potentially save you.

Choosing not to claim is motivated by spite, not alignment.
Spite, however, can be alignment-indicative, in this case, further proof Wednesday is town.

[Flubbernugget]

@Ranger That's only bad from your perspective?

[Ranger]

I'll switch to Persivul if necessary to get a non-Wednesday, non-Ranger lynch, but I think I prefer Starbuck above all others.

[Flubbernugget]

I would need a damn good reason an unvote one one of you two isn't a scum claim

[Ranger]

I would need a damn good reason an unvote one one of you two isn't a scum claim

Well in that case...

VOTE: Ranger

Interesting.

I get scumvibes from Persivul.

UNVOTE:
VOTE: Persivul

VOTE: Lane

This is so scum.

[Flubbernugget]

Cool we can test his unlynchable claim tomorrow

[Smithereens]

Also, Persivul throwing casual scum claims around on page 17 didn't go unnoticed.

I reviewed page 17 and saw that I was pressuring Almost50, who I made a case on way back in 195. No clue what you mean by throwing casual scum claims around...although that's what you seem to be doing here, by making the claim without mentioning any specifics.

I must've missed the 195th post then. Or else I wasn't thinking of it when you waltzed in and labelled a seemingly innocuous post scum. Try put the links with it or else the context condemns you more than him.

[Smithereens]

Idk how unlynchables work. Does the Day end with a no lynch if he attains majority vote?

[RadiantCowbells]

VOTE: RC

If you guys are gonna be dumb let's do this today.

[Smithereens]

yeah but do we lose today's lynch if we test it?

UNVOTE:

VOTE: RC

[RadiantCowbells]

obviously.

but better to lose D1 then D2

[Persivul]

I must've missed the 195th post then. Or else I wasn't thinking of it when you waltzed in and labelled a seemingly innocuous post scum. Try put the links with it or else the context condemns you more than him.

I'd say this post condemns you more than either of us. You're not paying attention to the game, voting on nothing, and yet accusing me of doing the same when you should know that I've been scum reading Almost50 for most of the game.

[Persivul]

UNVOTE: Almost50
VOTE: Starbuck.
Vote may change (RadiantCowbells or Persivul in particular), but I'm thinking I was wrong on Almost50, and that Almost50 is town now.
Not absolutely sure, but enough where I'm not comfortable voting there anymore.

Throwing a vote on the guy with two posts?!? Whenever I want to start thinking you're town, you do something inexplicable.

[Smithereens]

I must've missed the 195th post then. Or else I wasn't thinking of it when you waltzed in and labelled a seemingly innocuous post scum. Try put the links with it or else the context condemns you more than him.

I'd say this post condemns you more than either of us. You're not paying attention to the game, voting on nothing, and yet accusing me of doing the same when you should know that I've been scum reading Almost50 for most of the game.

Voting on nothing? It was clearly implied that interpreting a behaviour as scummy without contextual justification is scummy as fuck. There was no context there and all I associate with you is the push against Wednesday + Ranger which just reeks of opportunism. So from my PoV you sir are sitting on a scum slot.

I'm not autistic, I can't recall a list of who voted who at all moments of the game. You can assume the others are like me, so for our benefit the scum read should be more clearly explained. Otherwise it looks exactly how it appears. Prima Facie Scum.

[Kraeg]

(expired on 2016-01-09 08:56:47)

Vote Count:

Wednesday_[5] - BlackStar, Flubbernugget, Persivul, lane0168, Frozen Angel
RadiantCowbells[2] - RadiantCowbells, Smithereens
Ranger[1] - Jackal711
Starbuck[1] - Ranger
davesaz[1] - Starbuck
Frozen Angel[1] - Wednesday_


Not voting: Almost50, davesaz

7 votes are needed for a lynch.

[RadiantCowbells]

I still don't buy this scumslip argument at all.

[Kraeg]

Jackal711 and Starbuck has been prodded.

[Frozen Angel]

I still don't buy this scumslip argument at all.

There Are Several Other Reasons To Lynch Wednesday.

Why Your Not Paying Attention ...

[RadiantCowbells]

Why u hav to be mean to me!