well actually I'm interested in new Ranger post ...
Jackle lets start posting ! shall we?
Star where are you girl?
Percival your read list have an update?
OMG, are you seriously letting him get into your head? It's obvious that RC thinks (correctly it would seem) that he can play you and is desperate to derail the Wednesday wagon. Why do you think that is? What kind of person tries to derail one wagon while not pushing another? Scum, that's who.
pedit: seems that scum have daytalk with the sudden concerted effort to attack me.
In post 596, Almost50 wrote:Well, I don't know "damn well" what this specific group of players think, so I had to ask. But you do agree in essence that it's the right thing to do. You just don't think it will gain momentum. Right?
Yep...unless Wednesday's scum and scum have daytalk, or are just good at following each other's lead. This last page or two is really obvious. The sad thing is that Frozen fell for it. Radiant knows how to push her buttons.
Now go and vote for Jackal like a good little goon...
well actually I'm interested in new Ranger post ...
Jackle lets start posting ! shall we?
Star where are you girl?
Percival your read list have an update?
OMG, are you seriously letting him get into your head? It's obvious that RC thinks (correctly it would seem) that he can play you and is desperate to derail the Wednesday wagon. Why do you think that is? What kind of person tries to derail one wagon while not pushing another? Scum, that's who.
pedit: seems that scum have daytalk with the sudden concerted effort to attack me.
I don't see why not. There's not a whole lot of info/substance in his posts anyway, except for the remark about Ranger's playstyle, which could be equally true or false. Furthermore, he only hop-voted between RC (for personal reasons), Ranger & Wednesday, which looks like he's going along with the current.
VOTE: Jackal
In post 599, Frozen Angel wrote:So it has the same probability to the form which has 2 scums! so what ...
Nothing. Just like to poke you in the nose every now and then for fun.
In post 598, Persivul wrote:It's obvious that RC thinks (correctly it would seem) that he can play you and is desperate to derail the Wednesday wagon. Why do you think that is? What kind of person tries to derail one wagon while not pushing another? Scum, that's who.
pedit: seems that scum have daytalk with the sudden concerted effort to attack me.
That's correct. RC is also with us, so that makes 4 of us, all in one faction. Who else?
It seems to me that Your Majesty is possessed with the thought that Wednesday IS scum. Everybody who appears to be "slightly not interested" becomes her partner.
You also seem paranoid when someone points out something you said they didn't like. I did specify an obvious contradiction in your logic there regarding Starbuck, and you didn't even care to explain. Instead, you shrugged it off as "pre-arranged scum talk" (I hold the right for labeling it thus. You didn't use this phrasing.)
In post 601, Persivul wrote:Yep...unless Wednesday's scum and scum have daytalk, or are just good at following each other's lead. This last page or two is really obvious. The sad thing is that Frozen fell for it. Radiant knows how to push her buttons.
The problem here is you cannot possibly expect any given scum faction started off with 4 or 5 players. It maybe possible, but very very improbable, given the cards were drawn at random.
Now go and vote for Jackal like a good little goon...
Actually switching Jackal for Wednesday doesn't look like a bad idea, IMHO. I'd very much rather lose to scum talent than town inactivity. Jackal could still come out and defend himself. If he doesn't then it's equally a good lynch as Starbuck's
In post 609, Almost50 wrote:
That's correct. RC is also with us, so that makes 4 of us, all in one faction. Who else?
It seems to me that Your Majesty is possessed with the thought that Wednesday IS scum. Everybody who appears to be "slightly not interested" becomes her partner.
Yep. You paint that as suspicious, but it's scum hunting 101. If you guys were coming in, positively town reading Wednesday, and giving support for those reads, it wouldn't be suspicious. BUT, you're just coming in and pushing an alternate wagon on an easy target without putting your neck on the line for Wednesday. You're hedging. You don't want Wednesday lynched, but she might be, so when she flips red you want to be able to say that you weren't really
for
her, you just felt like policy lynching a lurker. You then have a built-in excuse when the lurker flips green. The last page or two was obvious basic scum play.
@Persivul: I think you're missing my point here. Let me retry this: There is a VERY VERY SMALL CHANCE that we are all scum, and even a smaller chance (almost no chance) we're all of the same faction.
Hypothetically speaking, if I'm scum partners with Wednesday, how do you explain RC, Ranger & Smither's actions? Even if one of them is a 3rd member of the same faction, how do you explain the other 2? Another faction?? But why would ANOTHER FACTION derail the lynch? And how do they even know her alignment already??
You see, this is why I'm calling you "possessed" .. you're haunted with on fixed idea (that may or may not be true) about one person, and judging everybody based on your "unverified" assumption, yet forgetting the results you come to are most illogical to begin with.
ANY given one of us could be scum, granted. Any pair could be of the same faction, I'll accept that. Three is unlikely, four is stretching it, and five strips you from any credibility.
Now your attitude could be interpreted as one of two things: a very misguided town player who is eager to win that they're overlooking some basics, OR a very GOOD scum player who wants to appear very actively scumhunting that even if their target flips green they'd still be on the clear.
I honestly don't know what to think of you between the two though, which is why I'm not voting you.
Well the point is I'm working on an update. my last reads [full detailed] is in post VOTE: 417 only wednesday seems terribly more scummier since then and RC and Ranger seems more townish
Radiant cowbells feels really scummy. All he does is randomly vote for everybody in the game for no reason whatsoever. He claims that he can't be lynched. He reiterates a million times that he's definitely town. And for some reason, as soon as Wednesday was about to get lynched RC started trying very hard to form a wagon on Jackal. I guess it's possible that Wednesday and RC were on the same side the entire time and tried not to make it too obvious before now.
I've got jackal on null, and while I can't totally disagree with lynching his lurky, I think Wednesday is better, davesaz is better too. I think it's too early in the game to lynch a lurker, and I think after 25 pages if that's the best candidate, it's quite possibly scum, or scum driven.
It's obvious that RC thinks (correctly it would seem) that he can play you and is desperate to derail the Wednesday wagon. Why do you think that is? What kind of person tries to derail one wagon while not pushing another? Scum, that's who.
