In post 55, MrTrow wrote:A known issue with nearly everything i write (not just here), i'm working on it, if i screw up again, feel free to ask.
Yes this does mean i would like to see a question from you, soon. (the offer stands, regardless)
Should a decent response to this come, i'll probably support this chancellor
In post 69, JDGA wrote: In post 55, MrTrow wrote:Given the 'completely random policy should the counter hit 3', NOs should be avoided. (at least a bit)
This is bad, if we avoid NO simply for the sake of avoiding NO we deny ourselves a lot of info while advancing the gamestate faster than we ought to.
As the quote states, it is 3 consecutive NOs that should be avoided.
Let me clarify:
Voting No, because you don't want the current candidate to be president, perfectly fine. I intend to do so myself in case of shos, by that time i hope for some others as well
Voting No, because the presidential candidate goes against your (or the entire towns) advice on chancellor selection, great ('merely ok' of the advice ignored is 'stating intent to nominate')
Voting No, because you showed up too late to argue against the 'intent to nominate'-target, shit happens, go ahead and vote no
Voting No, because you refused to state your concerns for no other reason than 'hey, i can still always vote no', bad idea. (an approach that was the game-state at time of writing (still seems to be), despite reasonable efforts by our candidate-president)
current gamestate, we can vote no on drench: not really a big deal, however then we have lilith, which leaves us with the choice, install lilith (yes) or hand complete control over to Klick (no #2), because voting no(#3) on Klick is a 2/3 chance of a facist policy and no information what so ever to show for it.
To argue we get more info out of the votes themselves, than out of the justifications (with which we already successfully denied a chancellor), i disagree
In post 72, Blackberry wrote:But after rereading their posts by themselves, shos I'm thinking is more likely overeager to get the game rolling.
That is the image he seemed to be going for when
he asked the game to start and
posting nearly instantly the moment it did (completely ignoring your post, which did contain content, to joke about the flavor) 2 days before deciding to actually read the game.
All the while telling others to provide useful stuff to read without actually believing in it being usefull
I buy his eagerness to play, as much as i buy his scumreads in a gamestate of which he claims it is impossible to have scumreads yet.
By the way, your mum says hello.
Jelly's coming off as trying too hard, honestly.