In post 399, talah wrote:It seems like you have a predisposition to wanting to townread me and want to have a reason to reinforce that after the fact.
Maybe this more appropriate
^_-
Kind of? Like, I saw potential town motivation in what you posted but everyone was prematurely bashing you for it. So I wanted you to come back and explain calmly.
Maybe this confirms us as town because I'm not dumb enough as scum to speak on the behalf of a hydra partner when it comes to reads in case of inconsistency!
Second I never said he was scum. He is conf biasing, something town can do as well.
Whether it was malicious remains to be seen.
~Spiffy
Because Mana Khemia is a thing, you've seen how easily recognizable is anti scum via level of activity and engagement in general.
On another note your play this game is starting to feel really awkward.
Also your hydra partner isn't making things easy for you by trying to avoid hydra dissonance right after you guys do hydra dissonance feels like those trips could be alignment indicative of either of you trying to do damage control on what the other is doing and is taking the opposite effect.
In post 437, Sakura Hana wrote:Because Mana Khemia is a thing, you've seen how easily recognizable is anti scum via level of activity and engagement in general.
On another note your play this game is starting to feel really awkward.
Also your hydra partner isn't making things easy for you by trying to avoid hydra dissonance right after you guys do hydra dissonance feels like those trips could be alignment indicative of either of you trying to do damage control on what the other is doing and is taking the opposite effect.
Sakura I was like the last person to even identify Anti scum in that game so I don't know why you're acting like I know Anti-scum inside and out.
Don't buzzword at me. What posts come across as awkward.
Like i usually see you questioning everyone's reads and here you even provided a couple of reads that we had to squeeze your guts to be able to get explanation out of.
In post 202, Wisdom wrote:Why do scum lie about meta reads, Expedience? It's something that can be cross-checked. If Ether indicated that she has had experience with scum-Cobalt, and he was more serious, then that's true, regardless of Ether's alignment.
I think that Scatterplot carelessly threw out a townread at PhantomCobalt and then used meta to justify it afterwards. If they came out originally saying that they thought PhantomCobalt was town from meta then I think they would put more thought into their stance beforehand and it wouldn't be so full of holes, but they had to be pushed to provide reasoning.
I know phantom's meta better then anyone here and Phantom is scum
In post 446, KTthecreeper wrote:Okay Mad king's chainsaw defense has convinced me that scatterplot is scum VOTE: Scatterplot
What does this mean? Mad King Ashnard hasn't been defending Scatterplot, at all.
And what makes Scatterplot a better vote than PhantomCobalt, if you have such a strong meta read on PhantomCobalt?
I said I respected his chainsaw defense witch means defending yourself with an attack on the attacker witch is called a chainsaw defense.
I droped my vote on phantom because I think plot is a bigger threat as scum.
Spoiler: something i'd post on md
that's not what chainsaw defense is (or at least not what ppl mean around here when they say "chainsaw defense).
when ppl on ms say "chainsaw defense" they mean defending another person by attacking that person's attacker. it used to be treated as a "scumtell" (see: tarhalindur's standard scumtells, the basic idea is that scum will chainsaw defend their scumbuddies), but it's since grown into a meaningless buzzword. it's ESPECIALLY meaningless in the absence of flips.
The distance between insanity and genius is measured only by success.
