Blitz 21 - Hope plus One ―kibou― [End]

pieguyn · Post Post #675 (ISO) » Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:26 pm

votecount 1.8

KTthecreeper (5) - Ranger, Wisdom, PhantomCobalt, Scatterplot, Trebuchet MS
talah (5) - hiplop, Mad King Ashnard, Antihero, Sakura Hana, Ankamius

Scatterplot (2) - Expedience, KTthecreeper
Mad King Ashnard (1) - talah

Not voting (0) -

With 13 alive, it takes 7 to lynch. Deadline is January 24, 2:00 GMT-7 or in (expired on 2016-01-24 02:00:00).

talah · Post Post #676 (ISO) » Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:26 pm

In post 672, Ankamius wrote:
In post 670, talah wrote:Also you're wrong and you should be right or at least somewhat right, and you should be attempting to read me, and you're not.

VOTE: talah

Yep, I'm on board now.

Explain why.

talah · Post Post #677 (ISO) » Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:27 pm

In post 670, talah wrote:Also you're wrong and you should be right or at least somewhat right, and you should be attempting to read me, and you're not.

This was at RC btw if it wasn't obvious

Mad King Ashnard · Post Post #678 (ISO) » Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:28 pm

ok.

Thanks Sakura!

talah · Post Post #679 (ISO) » Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:28 pm

In post 667, hiplop wrote:Which makes you all the more likely to trip over the things I caught you on.

We've never played a game together I don't even understand what you're talking about

hiplop · Post Post #680 (ISO) » Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:29 pm

In post 679, talah wrote:
In post 667, hiplop wrote:Which makes you all the more likely to trip over the things I caught you on.

We've never played a game together I don't even understand what you're talking about

...................................................

WHY DO YOU KEEP TALKING ABOUT OTHER GAMES

talah · Post Post #681 (ISO) » Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:29 pm

In post 678, Mad King Ashnard wrote:ok.

Thanks Sakura!

Kind of smug with your townlynch, aren't you?

Ankamius · Post Post #682 (ISO) » Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:29 pm

In post 677, talah wrote:
In post 670, talah wrote:Also you're wrong and you should be right or at least somewhat right, and you should be attempting to read me, and you're not.

This was at RC btw if it wasn't obvious

...

I don't buy this.

talah · Post Post #683 (ISO) » Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:30 pm

In post 680, hiplop wrote:
In post 679, talah wrote:
In post 667, hiplop wrote:Which makes you all the more likely to trip over the things I caught you on.

We've never played a game together I don't even understand what you're talking about

...................................................

WHY DO YOU KEEP TALKING ABOUT OTHER GAMES

BECAUSE YOU KEEP ALLUDING TO KNOW THINGS ABOUT ME

talah · Post Post #684 (ISO) » Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:30 pm

In post 682, Ankamius wrote:
In post 677, talah wrote:
In post 670, talah wrote:Also you're wrong and you should be right or at least somewhat right, and you should be attempting to read me, and you're not.

This was at RC btw if it wasn't obvious

...

I don't buy this.

wut

Ankamius · Post Post #685 (ISO) » Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:30 pm

In post 676, talah wrote:
In post 672, Ankamius wrote:
In post 670, talah wrote:Also you're wrong and you should be right or at least somewhat right, and you should be attempting to read me, and you're not.

VOTE: talah

Yep, I'm on board now.

Explain why.

Your response to pressure isn't town.

Antihero · Post Post #686 (ISO) » Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:31 pm

alright expedience

you've got the conn

hiplop · Post Post #687 (ISO) » Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:32 pm

In post 686, Antihero wrote:alright expedience

you've got the conn

?

talah · Post Post #688 (ISO) » Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:32 pm

In post 685, Ankamius wrote:
In post 676, talah wrote:
In post 672, Ankamius wrote:
In post 670, talah wrote:Also you're wrong and you should be right or at least somewhat right, and you should be attempting to read me, and you're not.

VOTE: talah

Yep, I'm on board now.

Explain why.

Your response to pressure isn't town.

That's an assertion but it's not an explanation when I flip.
Try harder.

Antihero · Post Post #689 (ISO) » Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:33 pm

In post 687, hiplop wrote:
In post 686, Antihero wrote:alright expedience

you've got the conn

?

look @ the vote count.
the kt replacement + talah aren't going to vote themselves. expedience is the tie breaker.

and i kinda' like it that way. let's see what he does.

Ankamius · Post Post #690 (ISO) » Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:34 pm

In post 677, talah wrote:
In post 670, talah wrote:Also you're wrong and you should be right or at least somewhat right, and you should be attempting to read me, and you're not.

This was at RC btw if it wasn't obvious

1. The assertion itself is wrong no matter who you levy it at.
2. The timing of when you made the two posts are really really awkward.

AKA it makes you sound really panicked. AKA scum cracking under pressure.

hiplop · Post Post #691 (ISO) » Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:34 pm

I feel like people might move over fwiw (plot for example was on it earlier? )

btw what does conn mean

Antihero · Post Post #692 (ISO) » Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:35 pm

it's a star trek reference...

oh forget it. uncultured swine fjdkls;ajeeeeevlksas;dajd;saf

hiplop · Post Post #693 (ISO) » Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:36 pm

I thought you meant to say conch ala lord of the flies

talah · Post Post #694 (ISO) » Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:40 pm

In post 690, Ankamius wrote:
In post 677, talah wrote:
In post 670, talah wrote:Also you're wrong and you should be right or at least somewhat right, and you should be attempting to read me, and you're not.

This was at RC btw if it wasn't obvious

1. The assertion itself is wrong no matter who you levy it at.
2. The timing of when you made the two posts are really really awkward.

AKA it makes you sound really panicked. AKA scum cracking under pressure.

Flailing, am I?

You actually said you didn't believe my clarification that I was talking to RC which implied that you were thinking that hiplop and I were scumbuddies.

Anyway... I'm frustrated but I don't see your "panicked" argument. Like I think in my entire 2 years here I've never been "panicked". I'm interested to know about all the other "panicked" scum you've caught before. Common thing, is it?

Ankamius · Post Post #695 (ISO) » Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:46 pm

It's really telling when none of your response makes any sense.

talah · Post Post #696 (ISO) » Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:54 pm

In post 684, talah wrote:
In post 682, Ankamius wrote:
In post 677, talah wrote:
In post 670, talah wrote:Also you're wrong and you should be right or at least somewhat right, and you should be attempting to read me, and you're not.

This was at RC btw if it wasn't obvious

...

I don't buy this.

wut

In post 695, Ankamius wrote:It's really telling when none of your response makes any sense.

I thought you were talking about "this is at RC" initially.

RC should be able to read me a bit better considering he was going to NK me OR scum last game. There should be some kind of argument there similar to the Plot argument since we both have precisely one completed game with him apparently. He has no argument.

I'm thinking this is really weird and doesn't match up at all.

Mad King Ashnard · Post Post #697 (ISO) » Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:58 pm

That argument really doesn't make sense.

You're arguing that because in a previous game I scumread you when you were town (aka read you wrong) that I should be able to read you better than to be able to scumread you when you are (you claim) town.

This doesn't grok.

talah · Post Post #698 (ISO) » Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:04 pm

Well you just did the opposite of that and claimed to strongly scumread Plotinus in this game on the basis of exactly the same game.

Anyway I'd just think you'd be more cautious about a read you got wrong last game. I usually am.

talah · Post Post #699 (ISO) » Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:17 pm

So what's it gonna be? My flip?

Let's start making assumptions and plans based on that and also assume I flip town.

I actually don't mind right now but if you're a tunnel-townie how about you assess who's scum on this wagon?