In post 821, KuroiXHF wrote:Just in case you are genuine about that I'll explain.
For the third time
.
If frank is town and you are town, him voting for you ends the game. Probably not instantly like with a hammer, but pretty surely withing 24 hours.
I check this game multiple times within a 24-hour period. The only time I don't have a good hold on this is when I'm sleeping. Even when things are like yesterday and I'm only near a phone, I can still make out an unvote if I feel it necessary.
I am pretty sure you know daytalk exists.
You might as well check once daily, for all the good it does ya as far as unvoting is concerned.
I am not buying this attitude, but at least you are consistent about it.
When a townie votes in LYLO it has the severity of a hammer.
When scum votes in LYLO it has the severity of a regular vote. There is no risk of ending the game.
And I understood all this. You're simply repeating yourself. And like I said, I find pignash to be scummy enough that if I came back and found tow more votes on him, I'd at least have enough hope that it would still flip red text.
Ya took off the vote in response to frank and I, and still haven't re-voted, so not buying this either.
There are motivated town too, which I hope you are.
Indeed.
This is why you voting was such a big deal. Because you treated your vote like scum does.
This is why I asked him to hold the intent, because if it's camn-pig, him voting would end the game.
And this is where
you
are misunderstanding me. My nitpick wasn't on the vote, it was on the INTENTION of the vote. My nitpick was you asking him to hold off the intention of the vote, whereas only the vote meant a great deal.
Frank had already given the intent. I am not a english native, but I am reasonably certain that my intention of "don't vote yet" was clear to all.
Ye'r lucky my ex was a grammar natzi too, so I actually buy that you think this is a point worth addressing. It isn't.
Fair warning then, franksa is my biggest townread, you my biggest scumread. Deciding between you two will not be hard for me.
If you're worried about me voting your townread, you can lessen your concern. The last couple of posts by pignash made me much more convinced I should put my vote back on him.
I liked your initial reasoning better, but ok.
Well I do like to think about, at this stage of the game, finding the first mafia. I'm not so inclined on finding Mafia #2 if we can't find the first one. If Camn defending him clears him, OK, but are you trying to prove a camn/franksa scum team?
Frank said camn defended him. camn disagreed.
I asked frank to link the defending, but he hasn't done that.
This definitely does not clear frank, it's evidence to the contrary.
I am not trying to prove camn/franksa. I am suspecting you.
Why did you think camn defending him would clear him? Why would I try to prove camn/frank and clear frank in the same sentence? What is your thought process here, cause all I am getting is noise.
Because you can see the a possible means of franksa being scum. If I'm going to try to see out of your eyes, it would be camn trying to guide franksa in the mafia chat. It would explain franksa's very quiet demeanor and his refusal to answer the question. I was merely trying to connect your logic.
franksa was quiet before camn replaced in.
Doesn't make sense unless you think frank was receiving advice from CC.
I encouraged you to push frank and gave the camn-defend thing as a possible angle to do so. Nothing more.
And don't kid me, tictac, you suspect everyone - everyone but yourself.
I do indeed, but to varying degrees.
In post 810, KuroiXHF wrote:Pignash played his game. He made the appearance of wanting to scum hunt. He didn't make any hints or statements of, "I"m a bad player." He simply said it after I was unrelenting in my pressure regarding Sarg's death.
Your
pressure? I seem to remember you mostly going after franksa before that post.
It seemed like his excuse was, "Why did you bother pay attention to my scumminess? I'm a terrible player! It's like you're getting mad at me for something I said when I was drunk!" It seemed like he gave up on logic and reasoning and appealed to my emotion.
That post was scummy indeed. Not sure about the AtE (Appeal to Emotion).
You are just describing why the post was scummy. Why does the term OMGUS apply?
OMGUS="Oh My God You Suck"
It's a term used when people suspect people who are attacking them, and is generally considered scummy.
You are a grammar natzi. You are not prone to using terms you don't know the meaning of.
I didn't say you asked for concrete proof. Your use of strawmanning is strawmanning my argument.
You said you don't have concrete proof instead of addressing the thing I asked you to address in that post, so no I do not think i was strawmanning your strawman.
I'll grant that you have at least tried to do what I asked later thou.
