In post 147, Aristophanes wrote:What are your reads?
We're you part of the Postie Scum Masterpiece?
What's your favourite word to sneak into conversation?
What do you think of the H&H Hydra?
Are these questions just random vague suggestions in an attempt to inspire discussion, or are you actually looking for serious answers for most of these?
I mean, I want discussion and feel Dav hasn't done too much of it.
It's a starting point.
Some of these are serious and deserve a serious answer. Some are more for discussion starting than anything else.
I misread the "why does it matter?" as "does it matter?" oops.
It matters because it looks like you're trying to look busy without actually engaging properly. You're being superficial.
I asked "why does it matter," not "does it matter?"
Whatever though.
Why the revoke? What is scummy about my questions or reactions to your questions about my questions?
I'd honestly love to know.
Ninja'd
Lol
And no. I am trying to engage him so I can read him. He has called for a cop on you and tunneled BLP. I want to sort him for more than just that, but it's all he's done.
I fail to see how it is superficial.
In post 157, Aristophanes wrote:I am trying to engage him so I can read him. He has called for a cop on you and tunneled BLP. I want to sort him for more than just that, but it's all he's done.
I fail to see how it is superficial.
Okay, then explain to me why you asked him the questions that you did and how they will help you get a read on him.
I finally watched the YouTube video that was linked in the mod post
I love Jimmy Fallon he's such a gem. Probably the most accessible host on late night television these days. I can't explain why but I never really got into the whole Conan craze.
In post 119, BNL wrote:I couldn't get a strong scum read, so I voted you as it was RVS.
Are you saying your vote on Davsto was RVS? Cause I didn't get that sense from your vote. VOTE: BNL
I'm like halfway sure this is town Postie, especially given her push on Aristo.
"I think I no longer believe in monsters as faces in the floor or feral infants or vampires or whatever. I think at seventeen now I believe the only real monsters might be the type of liar where there's simply no way to tell. The ones who give nothing away"
In post 157, Aristophanes wrote:I am trying to engage him so I can read him. He has called for a cop on you and tunneled BLP. I want to sort him for more than just that, but it's all he's done.
I fail to see how it is superficial.
Okay, then explain to me why you asked him the questions that you did and how they will help you get a read on him.
In post 147, Aristophanes wrote:What are your reads?
We're you part of the Postie Scum Masterpiece?
What's your favourite word to sneak into conversation?
What do you think of the H&H Hydra?
In post 147, Aristophanes wrote:1. What are your reads?
2. We're you part of the Postie Scum Masterpiece?
3. What's your favourite word to sneak into conversation?
4. What do you think of the H&H Hydra?
whoops, submitted too early.
1. I am genuinely curious as he has not discussed any save for BPL. Answers dependant, can help me sort him or at least know his stances.
2. I'd like to know as it may null out the scum read from his cop request. Well, null-scum it, as I still dislike the posts.
3. A bit of fun.
4. Once again, curious, and a slot with high activity. I asked specifically because I know they have prior game's (individual heads do) and I want this interaction to take place. Will a in in reading both slots I think.
In post 119, BNL wrote:I couldn't get a strong scum read, so I voted you as it was RVS.
Are you saying your vote on Davsto was RVS? Cause I didn't get that sense from your vote.
I did. At least, I got the sense it was one of those semi-serious votes that exists in between RVS and serious votes; the nit-picking-to-get-the-game-moving type of vote.
In post 119, BNL wrote:I couldn't get a strong scum read, so I voted you as it was RVS.
Are you saying your vote on Davsto was RVS? Cause I didn't get that sense from your vote.
I did. At least, I got the sense it was one of those semi-serious votes that exists in between RVS and serious votes; the nit-picking-to-get-the-game-moving type of vote.
if I weren't townreading you I'd want to push you for answering a question meant for someone else. Just FYI.
In post 164, Postie wrote:I did. At least, I got the sense it was one of those semi-serious votes that exists in between RVS and serious votes; the nit-picking-to-get-the-game-moving type of vote.
Why did you answer for BNL?
Like seriously please don't do this
"I think I no longer believe in monsters as faces in the floor or feral infants or vampires or whatever. I think at seventeen now I believe the only real monsters might be the type of liar where there's simply no way to tell. The ones who give nothing away"
In post 166, Aristophanes wrote:if I weren't townreading you I'd want to push you for answering a question meant for someone else. Just FYI.
What? I didn't answer the question. I can't, because I'm not BNL. I just said I disagreed with GL's interpretation of it not being an RVS vote.
And how come you're townreading me?
In post 168, TheCow wrote:was selfvoting some kind of rhetoric that went over my head?
I dunno. I kinda wanted my own wagon to take off to see who would hop on it and for what reason. But since I obviously wasn't in support of my own lynch, my vote didn't and wouldn't have really done anything probably.
In post 166, Aristophanes wrote:if I weren't townreading you I'd want to push you for answering a question meant for someone else. Just FYI.
What? I didn't answer the question. I can't, because I'm not BNL. I just said I disagreed with GL's interpretation of it not being an RVS vote.
And how come you're townreading me?
Despite the fact that it is I who am the focus, I like your motivation and seeming desire to get shit done. You're relentless, but in a good way.
Also, shit like this:
Postie wrote:
In post 168, TheCow wrote:was selfvoting some kind of rhetoric that went over my head?
I dunno. I kinda wanted my own wagon to take off to see who would hop on it and for what reason. But since I obviously wasn't in support of my own lynch, my vote didn't and wouldn't have really done anything probably.
