Davesaz (1): Aeronaut
Aj The Epic (0):
AlwaysInnocent (0):
Frozen Angel (0):
Aeronaut (0):
Not voting: Frozen Angel, AlwaysInnocent, Aj The Epic, Davesaz
With 5 alive it's 3 to lynch.
Night falls in (expired on 2016-02-16 14:00:00).
But if it's not Dave, and it's not you, then who is the remaining scum? I can tell you it isn't me either.In post 1790, Aj The Epic wrote:I don't understand wanting to go for a miller at this point. Unless you see something to say that was just a gambit, I'm not a fan of lynching it.
Two scum left? I assume there is only one scum left?In post 1803, Aj The Epic wrote:My leaning has been you and Dier. I was wrong on dier so I'm being more cautious, but the only thought I had was if there was going to be two scum left, it would've been dier+FA. I don't think FA is scum with you, largely because Dier was the only questionable interactions that I associated with her. I don't see a case for dav, neither him nor his predecessor have concerned me. So currently I am inclined to believe it is you.
In post 1806, AlwaysInnocent wrote:Two scum left? I assume there is only one scum left?
Just because you want to believe it doesn't make it true. I learned this the hard way with Dierfire.In post 1809, Aj The Epic wrote:I want to believe it's you since I had you as scum from day 1.
In post 1810, AlwaysInnocent wrote:Just because you want to believe it doesn't make it true. I learned this the hard way with Dierfire.In post 1809, Aj The Epic wrote:I want to believe it's you since I had you as scum from day 1.
What the hell are you talking about? This has to do with you being wrong as town. There is still some indecision on my part (being wrong about Dierfire kind of screwed me over), but my sentence didn't imply that in any way.In post 1812, Aj The Epic wrote:In post 1810, AlwaysInnocent wrote:Just because you want to believe it doesn't make it true. I learned this the hard way with Dierfire.In post 1809, Aj The Epic wrote:I want to believe it's you since I had you as scum from day 1.
You could've been 100x more convincing here by showing any sort of real concern.
+The fact that you too are not considering me as scum, at all. The way you talk to me suggests you believe me to be town, but your sentence wants you to imply some indecision on your own part. However, this contradicts yourself unless you're considering one or aero/fa scum.
In post 1817, AlwaysInnocent wrote:The case on Dave is actually the same case as on Albert B.
Does this mean I am confident? No. I shouldn't be confident after being wrong so many times. So I leave it up to you to sort it out.
They don't balance each other. They make the Cop role even weaker.In post 1821, davesaz wrote:A scum ascetic and a town miller balance each other. No reason both can't exist.
Holy shit. When did I "forget" to mention that?AI is just trying to cast doubt by forgetting to mention that ABR was scum.
ThatThe whole discussion was on the impossibility of both of those roles being presentas town.
I have never heard of that one before. Statistics or it didn't happen.A scum flip for ABR makes itmore likelythat town has a miller.
Right. If you are town, it was the best thing to do. But I'm wondering whether it was not an elaborate hoax.Taly did the right thing by claiming it right away, and I did the right thing by confirming it right away as soon as I replaced in.
Ascetic has negative utility for Town, regardless of the alignment of the Ascetic.In post 1822, davesaz wrote:Also remember that ascetic is not just investigation immune -- it is immune to everything else too. It is a more powerful role than miller.
In fact, ascetic is positive utility for scum where miller is negative utility for town.