1) Point me to these misrepresentations.Dybeck wrote: I'm assuming that since he is lining up to defend him with misrepresentation and lies in the mathematics, that shaft.ed is a possible other mafia. He's1 misrepresentedme on several occasions, and posted2 mathematics that he knows to be wrong (#637) to make it look like I'm incorrect,or3 somehow not hunting scum.Vollkan might be the other, or he might just be following shaft.ed's lead to appear helpful.
2) The bulk of the mathematics has been perfectly sound and very much in favour of not lynching Orig. You are focusing on one slip in one post.
3) No. You were very actively hunting Orig as a SK. I don't believe Orig is SK. This was you hunting someone who could be a SK but is very likely vig and you are ignoring the actual hunting of mafia, other than your latest insinuations about shaft.ed and myself.
Completely wrong!Dybeck wrote: If we mislynch, and originality is mafia, WE LOSE. It's worth noting that two people in this town would want that to happen. I'd urge the town not to get swept along on a tide. There are only two moves today that cannot result in us losing tonight - lynching originality or going no-lynch.
We do not lose as a fact if Orig is mafia and we mislynch.
All of this is assuming 5:3:1.
If Orig is mafia,
Mislynch = 4:3:1.
Mafia NK = 3:3:1 (in wcs)
SK NK = 3:2:1 (SK is going to target mafOrig since that is the only way that SK can hope to win)
D3 = 3:2:1. Yucky, but not a LOSS.
If we lynch Orig, we are 5:3 or 5:3 if he is vig or SK, which is more likely than him being mafia. That means the mafia NK puts us in LYLO.
If we lynch mafia today, we will most likely be at either 3:2 (LYLO wcs where Orig vig/SKs a town), 4:3 (LYLO, where Orig does nothing) or 4:1 (Best. Where Orig hits a mafia).
Dybeck is completely wrong.
And it could just be the case that Orig IS the vig...dybeck wrote: I'm not sure about the SK - right now I'd lean towards Oman, but it could be anyone.
Why do you believe us to be scum? I am discrediting you because *gasp* you are wrong.dybeck wrote: The problem is, that only these people I believe to be scum are posting, which means that as a block, they seem to be discrediting everything I say.
Your argument that he is lying has been refuted. I don't like your phrase "have to die".dybeck wrote: But I don't want any of this to dilute the core message, which is that originality is lying and he does have to die.