In post 2372, RadiantCowbells wrote:If you want to policy ignore my reads no matter how correct they are because of the person they're coming from I can't stop you.
nobody knows youre correct at the time
In post 2372, RadiantCowbells wrote:If you want to policy ignore my reads no matter how correct they are because of the person they're coming from I can't stop you.
meaning link added.In post 2367, AxleGreaser wrote:In post 2359, RadiantCowbells wrote:this game killed my mafia thing that I had.
I haven't been able to properly invest myself in a mafia game to the same extent since this one I'm so mad about what happened.
*shrug*
Really, turn about would be fair play then?
In post 2368, RadiantCowbells wrote:Not sure what you mean.
In post 2330, AxleGreaser wrote:Whenever i get around to playing mafia again. It may be a while before I have a large enough slab of time anddesire.
Speaking about heroes in Mafia. There are no heroes in Mafia. There is only good and poor teamplay. And fakeclaiming as town is more often poor teamplay than not (so exceptions do not break this general rule).
In post 2377, RadiantCowbells wrote:
Then work with me instead of being a stubborn ass and saying shit like 'UTL HAD HER WAGON!'
Then work with me instead of being a stubborn ass ...
In post 2379, Ircher wrote:I was mostly sheeping Axle's
In post 2386, Boonskiies wrote:Why not just stick to the plan, guy? Haha....Ircher was confirmed town pretty much, too.
In post 2392, RadiantCowbells wrote:
So yours was a good fake claim gambit?
I am sure Mina will update her advice accordingly.
Fakeclaiming is a desperation move and my situation was desperate there.
In post 2394, RadiantCowbells wrote:If you could understand what I was thinking when I was doing the things I did, you wouldn't have been wrong on every single one of your reads.
In post 2395, AxleGreaser wrote:In post 2394, RadiantCowbells wrote:If you could understand what I was thinking when I was doing the things I did, you wouldn't have been wrong on every single one of your reads.
people might understand what you were thinking if you explained it.
It gets very hard to understand what you were thinking when it is so self contradictory even now that virtually some of it must be lies.
You were and were not trying to get UTL lynched, and have literally claimed both.
You were desperate to get someone lynched but didn't happen to for instance know what the actual vote count was.
I was indeed wrong on my reads after about that point.
I am not sure how understanding whatever it is that would mean you both did and did not fake red check to UTL lynched will help that.
In post 2370, RadiantCowbells wrote:I gave a major explanation during the game about why Massive was scum.
In post 1608, RadiantCowbells wrote:That 'come after me tomorrow' was so calculated and flat.
Me no likey.
In post 1603, RadiantCowbells wrote:I think that Massive's hammer was calculatedly abrasive to look like it came from town while it was concealing a scum drive to protect his partner from being wagoned.