Mini 1761: Red Neighborhood - Day 2

hasta_la_pasta · Post Post #975 (ISO) » Thu Mar 03, 2016 1:45 pm

In post 973, droog wrote:
In post 970, hasta_la_pasta wrote:Lowell, I think your end-day voting has been too laxed.
Yesterday you brought Ari to L-1 without mention. After that you hammered Ric without intent.
This isn't the kind of voting that's going to win in a do or die situation.

?

It seems anti town to me to be voting haphazardly with seemingly little thought or awareness to the voting situation.
It could signify newbish play but considering how experienced Lowell is...

droog · Post Post #976 (ISO) » Thu Mar 03, 2016 3:25 pm

In post 975, hasta_la_pasta wrote:
In post 973, droog wrote:
In post 970, hasta_la_pasta wrote:Lowell, I think your end-day voting has been too laxed.
Yesterday you brought Ari to L-1 without mention. After that you hammered Ric without intent.
This isn't the kind of voting that's going to win in a do or die situation.

?

It seems anti town to me to be voting haphazardly with seemingly little thought or awareness to the voting situation.
It could signify newbish play but considering how experienced Lowell is...

whats your current loweell read

Persivul · Post Post #977 (ISO) » Fri Mar 04, 2016 1:10 am

Reviewing droog's ISO:

Pretends that he'll vote ari but doesn't:
830 - "i am willing to hammer ari...i want to develop a few other reads give everyone some time and hammer"
842 - "i think im going to go through persuvil"

Explains it in 863: "i think im losing mafia fever ftm" - in my experience apathy claims come from scum more than town

921 - "id be willing to lynch rica" - but doesn't; "but is there a reason we moved off ari?" yeah, no one would hammer

934 - Now you don't like the rica wagon and again ask about Ari, who you said you would hammer but didn't.

939 - more of the same

This looks like scum who wants to look like he's participating, but doesn't want his name actually showing up in lynch VCs.

VOTE: droog

Nosferatu · Post Post #978 (ISO) » Fri Mar 04, 2016 2:18 am

In post 977, Persivul wrote:

Explains it in 863: "i think im losing mafia fever ftm" - in my experience apathy claims come from scum more than town

by this logic, wouldn't Aristophanes be scum as well?

Persivul · Post Post #979 (ISO) » Fri Mar 04, 2016 2:37 am

Yes, that was a factor in voting Ari before. He since seems more engaged, but that could be scum trying to town it up.

DiamondSentinel · Post Post #980 (ISO) » Fri Mar 04, 2016 2:51 am

Vote Count 3.1

hasta_la_pasta [1]

: Dwlee99

Aristophanes [1]

: Garmr

Droog [1]

: Persivul

Not Voting [6]

: Aristophanes, hasta_la_pasta, Nosferatu, droog, Number_0ne, Lowell

5 Votes are required to obtain a lynch. 5 votes are also required to obtain a no-lynch prior to deadline.
Day 1 will end in (expired on 2016-03-17 12:00:00)

droog · Post Post #981 (ISO) » Fri Mar 04, 2016 4:50 am

In post 977, Persivul wrote:Pretends that he'll vote ari but doesn't:

but i did vote ari
i wouldve hammered if possible

droog · Post Post #982 (ISO) » Fri Mar 04, 2016 4:50 am

In post 601, droog wrote:all caugh up
not much to say on the last ~7 pages

the backoff on the ari wagon has me really concerned
VOTE: ari

Aristophanes · Post Post #983 (ISO) » Fri Mar 04, 2016 4:55 am

In post 982, droog wrote:
In post 601, droog wrote:all caugh up
not much to say on the last ~7 pages

the backoff on the ari wagon has me really concerned
VOTE: ari

That was D1. We're talking about D2.

Persivul · Post Post #984 (ISO) » Fri Mar 04, 2016 4:58 am

I'm talking about D1, and he only voted you after it didn't mean anything. As he noted himself: "the

backoff

on the ari wagon has me really concerned."

droog · Post Post #985 (ISO) » Fri Mar 04, 2016 5:00 am

In post 983, Aristophanes wrote:
In post 982, droog wrote:
In post 601, droog wrote:all caugh up
not much to say on the last ~7 pages

the backoff on the ari wagon has me really concerned
VOTE: ari
That was D1. We're talking about D2.

i voted you on both days

droog · Post Post #986 (ISO) » Fri Mar 04, 2016 5:02 am

In post 984, Persivul wrote:he only voted you
after it didn't mean anything.
As he noted himself: "the backoff on

kind of funny
that youd argue
that my vote on ari didnt matter
and that its the backbone of your case
"case"

Nosferatu · Post Post #987 (ISO) » Fri Mar 04, 2016 5:03 am

@persival I can see a scum-team of aristo-droog-??? with droog's votes being distance but I'd rather avoid that line of thought until either of those flip scum as I still town-read aristo.

But until then,

VOTE: Number 1

I don't see many dynamic reads here. Hasta is a persistant scum-read, for two posts, but he frequently votes people other than Hasta while just saying "I like hasta". It seems really "fake it 'til you make it"-esque and seems like it's just saying "just so you know, I'm scum reading hasta". Further on this, there are pushes on hasta, but NOT for hasta's lynch. I can't imagine that you believe hasta to be scum but only vote him once.

ISO in general seems like a lot of hedging and questions with not many apparent follow-ups.

Lowell · Post Post #988 (ISO) » Fri Mar 04, 2016 5:04 am

prod dodge. bad day for me. I'll try to post later if I can.

Aristophanes · Post Post #989 (ISO) » Fri Mar 04, 2016 5:20 am

In post 985, droog wrote:
In post 983, Aristophanes wrote:
In post 982, droog wrote:
In post 601, droog wrote:all caugh up
not much to say on the last ~7 pages

the backoff on the ari wagon has me really concerned
VOTE: ari
That was D1. We're talking about D2.

i voted you on both days

Then why is there only 1 Ari vote in your ISO?

Aristophanes · Post Post #990 (ISO) » Fri Mar 04, 2016 5:35 am

In post 984, Persivul wrote:I'm talking about D1, and he only voted you after it didn't mean anything. As he noted himself: "the
backoff
on the ari wagon has me really concerned."

Pers, his posturing to vote me without voting was on D2, this vote, which he used as a defense of it, occurred on D1.

Just trying to avoid confusion, since your original points and his response are incongruent.

Now you are discussing D1, yes, but only because he brought it us as a defense of his D2 play.

Aristophanes · Post Post #991 (ISO) » Fri Mar 04, 2016 5:36 am

In post 986, droog wrote:
In post 984, Persivul wrote:he only voted you
after it didn't mean anything.
As he noted himself: "the backoff on

kind of funny
that youd argue
that my vote on ari didnt matter
and that its the backbone of your case
"case"

This isn't true, as I just mentioned. Nice try though.

Aristophanes · Post Post #992 (ISO) » Fri Mar 04, 2016 5:37 am

Also liking Nos a lot

Persivul · Post Post #993 (ISO) » Fri Mar 04, 2016 6:30 am

In post 990, Aristophanes wrote:Pers, his posturing to vote me without voting was on D2, this vote, which he used as a defense of it, occurred on D1.

Just trying to avoid confusion, since your original points and his response are incongruent.

Now you are discussing D1, yes, but only because he brought it us as a defense of his D2 play.

I was going by ISO and not checking the full context, so I'll take your word for it. But I don't think droog has been pressured at all since he came in. What's your read on him?

Aristophanes · Post Post #994 (ISO) » Fri Mar 04, 2016 6:36 am

In post 993, Persivul wrote:
In post 990, Aristophanes wrote:Pers, his posturing to vote me without voting was on D2, this vote, which he used as a defense of it, occurred on D1.

Just trying to avoid confusion, since your original points and his response are incongruent.

Now you are discussing D1, yes, but only because he brought it us as a defense of his D2 play.

I was going by ISO and not checking the full context, so I'll take your word for it. But I don't think droog has been pressured at all since he came in. What's your read on him?

I think the pressure is warranted and that his answers here are bad.

My read was nullish town because I had liked Cirno. However, as I look back it us possible he is scum.

I really dislike his answering your case from D2 events with a quote from D1, lied about voting me D2, and has been so in the background despite acting helpful.

I wouldn't have looked at him without you bringing him up because he has been forgettable in terms game.

I'd support a wagon here.

droog · Post Post #995 (ISO) » Fri Mar 04, 2016 7:56 am

i didnt vote you yesterday
shit

droog · Post Post #996 (ISO) » Fri Mar 04, 2016 7:56 am

i swear i thought i had

Dwlee99 · Post Post #997 (ISO) » Fri Mar 04, 2016 9:22 am

Nos can you make a really good case on number one? I know you can.

Aristophanes · Post Post #998 (ISO) » Fri Mar 04, 2016 10:06 am

In post 997, Dwlee99 wrote:Nos can you make a really good case on number one? I know you can.

Can you not, Dwlee?

Dwlee99 · Post Post #999 (ISO) » Fri Mar 04, 2016 10:33 am

In post 998, Aristophanes wrote:
In post 997, Dwlee99 wrote:Nos can you make a really good case on number one? I know you can.
Can you not, Dwlee?

I want hasta dead though.