In post 446, Cookie Bakers wrote:*shrug*Cakey looks town to me.
Then go read my points on cakes. Think they're about page 13 or so.
Nobody has challenged those points yet.
Lots of people are ignoring it.
In post 446, Cookie Bakers wrote:*shrug*Cakey looks town to me.
In post 323, clearance only wrote:But that's the thing it wasn't an attempt to try and make him "more town-like" it was cakes telling PW (pretty blatantly) that he shouldn't be townreading us.
I struggle to see the town motive in trying to influencea scumreadsreads like that.
Like call him out sure and maybe supplement that to his scumread but not act as though Phoenix Wright wasgenuinelythinking those things and try and talk him out of his flawed reasoning.
Bottom line it's just a weird interaction.
In post 334, clearance only wrote:In post 273, SirCakez wrote:In post 257, Dwlee99 wrote:Their V key is broken, toog.
Why was this the only thing you said when you popped in then popped out?
Okay Nahdia maybe this post will convince you because it's what sold me.
This is a leading question. There's no correct answer here. There's nothing prying or trying to get something to figure out dwlees alignment.
It's just the post of a player who was surface scanning the thread looking for things to throw shade on.
It's 100% a scum post.
Vote for cakes.
In post 451, Cookie Bakers wrote:What are your thoughts on Toog?
In post 451, Cookie Bakers wrote:People do this all the time. Seeing what scumreads do allows for reevaluation of your scumread or getting information about their buddies. Scum get caught in the choices they make and the inconsistencies in their narratives.
In post 449, SirCakez wrote:Why I think Phoenix Wright is scum
-His unvote in 136 looks like an attempt to disengage from an argument when the tide turned against him. Deathtunneling does not automatically equal town and it looks like an excuse to try to escape his 1 v 1 with Cleavage. His reasons for unvoting the wagon were flawed and I explained why in a series of posts starting in 195.
-220 is a terrible vote. Radja popped in and started catching up and PW immediately made a vote on him for "agreeing with everyone else" which is not indicative of scum first of all, then as well he was unable to back it up when the point was refuted by Radja.
-His jump on me when Cleavage started pushing me was opportunistic as hell. He made zero mention of being suspicious of me until others began pushing me. This is a running trend throughout his ISO. He is very cautious and makes sure what he does fits with what most of the other players think at the time.
-387 and 390 are flail posts that town wouldn't make. After I refuted his points he instead decided to "stop talking to me" and run away.
In post 416, Aristophanes wrote:I don't get BeeBoy's "this is a long, spammy game" comment. It was at the end of Pg 2, and there were votes being tossed around. The game was neither that long nor that spammy at that point. Also, he had no read, yet knew it was spammy? Say what??
Oh the irony... It was obviously sarcasm since the game had been active for a while by that post, and it was only on page 2, so he was being snarky about how slow the game was moving.In post 417, Aristophanes wrote:Also, for people who supposedly read the game, you are really bad at picking up little things
If there is something wrong with the wagon, why do you want to pursue someone not related to the wagon at all?In post 420, clearance only wrote:SEE SEE.
You're not sure.
That's your instincts telling you somethings wrong.
Let's rock the boat a bit.
Help me lynch sircakez.
Most games I play with Titus have her lynched Day 1In post 436, Cookie Bakers wrote:Big rule, Titus gets copped n1. Kinda surprised it didn't happen in pyp.
Describe this gut feeling you are having. We've played quite a bit together Tits, so I'm interested in your read.In post 440, Cookie Bakers wrote:Help us on Toog dwlee? We can't articulate beyond gut but your Dave wagon stalled out. I don't like the major wagons and neither do you.
Join us? Let's see if we shake things up.
In post 455, Dwlee99 wrote:I think my vote is on cakes. They ask me annoying questions.
In post 460, Phoenix Wright wrote:And those last 3 points of yours happened after you said you'd write your case against me. So if they hadn't happened, you would only have one point for why you think I'm scum? Lol
In post 452, clearance only wrote:In post 334, clearance only wrote:In post 273, SirCakez wrote:In post 257, Dwlee99 wrote:Their V key is broken, toog.
Why was this the only thing you said when you popped in then popped out?
Okay Nahdia maybe this post will convince you because it's what sold me.
This is a leading question. There's no correct answer here. There's nothing prying or trying to get something to figure out dwlees alignment.
It's just the post of a player who was surface scanning the thread looking for things to throw shade on.
It's 100% a scum post.
Vote for cakes.
Here's my smoking gun. (it was on the next page)
It's good.
You're clear to sheep this.
In post 461, Toogeloo wrote:If there is something wrong with the wagon, why do you want to pursue someone not related to the wagon at all?
In post 459, Phoenix Wright wrote:That's a pretty weak case. Even if my reason for unvoting is "flawed", it wasn't an attempt to disengage and there's no way that you can prove that. The second thing you mentioned was a misunderstanding which once again I've already said. We've already gone over why your 3rd point is dumb. And that's not what scum flailing means, so yeah. Those are definitely posts that town would make. I was making an obvious point and you weren't listening to me at all. Who wants to argue with a brick wall?
In post 188, SirCakez wrote:I see there's a beeboy wagon forming. I've been glazing over his posts honestly, let me ISO him.
In post 194, SirCakez wrote:Beeboy's iso is actually pretty small. Two posts that stuck out to me were 103 and 145. Those were both really awkward. So Beeboy is nullscum for me atm.
In post 248, SirCakez wrote:Showing up quickly after being accused of lurking is quite scummy. My beeboy read drops further.
In post 469, SirCakez wrote:He actually never responded to the question I'm pretty sure.